Rod Gardner

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by TEXANS84, Jul 1, 2005.

  1. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    This just in from rotoworld.com, front page NFL.

     
  2. Big B Texan Fan

    Big B Texan Fan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,098
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Spring TX
    Was R. Gardner a Casserly draftee????
     
  3. texan279

    texan279 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,140
    Likes Received:
    154
    Location:
    Rosenberg TX
    WR is one of our stronger parts of the roster, I don't see us going after Gardner...
     
  4. pittbull

    pittbull All Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Houston
    May not sound like much, but the difference between the Texans making the playoffs and having another mediocre season is in he hands of a true #2 receiver. Although Gardner has failed to live up to the hype when drafted, he would be a perfect fit as a #2 in H-town. Gaffney banged up. Bradford has failed to achieve, and frankly, without Carr having a true second option, he'll be yelled out of town by not producing. Acutall, who in the leauge with the receiving corp we have, after AJ? Gaffney a good #3, Mathis a rookie, but after that..............................I don't even want to think about. Please bring in Rod and give us hope for the playoffs!
     
  5. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,936
    Likes Received:
    447
    I find it hard to imagine that receiver is our missing ingredient for the playoffs.
     
  6. STEEL BLUE TEXANS

    STEEL BLUE TEXANS Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,838
    Likes Received:
    220
    Location:
    Sugar Land, Texas
    Rod Gardner has terrible hands. There's a reason his nickname is 50/50.
     
  7. throwANDREtheBALL

    throwANDREtheBALL Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    CANADA
    hahahhahahha.........50/50.........it cracks me up everytime I hear his nickname...........that's gotta be the worst as a reciever.

    its gotta sting even worse than butterfingers or hands of stone.

    50/50 hahhahahaha

    Corey Bradford is getting close to that one too.
     
  8. Ihategeeks

    Ihategeeks Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,877
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Lions Hell
    Maybe the Lions should get him :bomb:
     


  9. Texas_Thrill

    Texas_Thrill Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    H-Town stomping once again!
    If the Lions get him ya'll might as well bring back the run and shoot with all those WR's ya'll would have.

    I have NO INTEREST in 50/50 playing for us. Though I wouldn't mind us making the playoffs this year I really dont think he'd be the DIFFERENCE.

    Though Gaffney lacks the ideal speed at 2 I'd rather have him. He's still young and had a nice year last year. I think we have 3 solid WR's to build on and our 4 and 5 aren't bad either. I'm looking fwd to future years of AJ, JM, and JG. Let them get the reps this year.
     
  10. Fury

    Fury Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Jerome Mathis won't contribute much as a rookie this year. Generally, it is very seldom that rookie receivers put up a 1,000 yard season. Most don't do well until the magical 3rd year in the league.

    It's time for Gaffney to fulfill his promise. That said, signing Gardner would not impede his progress. Having AJ and Gardner would allow Gaffney to become even more open. Gaffney would have the opposing D's least capable D-back covering him.

    I think Gardner has a lot to offer. Look at some of those QB's he had in that dead-in-the-water Redskin O the past few years: Ramsey, Brunell, T. Hasselbeck, Danny Wuerfful...if it's 50/50, I think that would also mean that half of them were just bad passes. The guy is capable. I would love it if the Titans signed him, and wouldn't cry about it if the Texans signed him. If the Jags sign him, I hope he changes to 25 caught/75 dropped. :cool:
     
  11. TheOgre

    TheOgre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Back in the cellar again
    TE, WR2, and OLT are the most blaring weaknesses on the team. We address those next offseason, and I think we will be in the hunt. This year I think we will be on the bubble.
     
  12. TPIMP

    TPIMP Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2005
    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    4
    Word is Rod Gardner will be released. We have the cap space. He is still young. If nothing else he and Dre would make the best blocking WR's in the league.
     
  13. throwANDREtheBALL

    throwANDREtheBALL Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    CANADA
    His hands are suspect, and like was said in the NFL discussion board, his nickname is 50/50........not exactly the kind of nickname that you want your receiver to have.
     
  14. throwANDREtheBALL

    throwANDREtheBALL Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    CANADA
    correction there..........C and TE are our most glaring needs and LT as well, if Pitts isn't moved back to that spot.

    WR2 isn't one of our top 3 needs or it would've been addressed. (or, maybe it would've been ignored along with the other top needs?)
     
  15. pockets44

    pockets44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2005
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think our need is finding a new TE but using the ones we got! Billy Miller is a play maker, we just don't use him like we should. He is a valuable weapon to Carr when used. D-line, OT, and #2 reciver is whats keeping us out of the playoffs
     
  16. TheOgre

    TheOgre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Back in the cellar again
    We would have taken Williamson he had fallen to us at 13. The opportunity just didn't present itself. Perhaps Mathis will be that guy, but he is still very raw.
     
  17. STEEL BLUE TEXANS

    STEEL BLUE TEXANS Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,838
    Likes Received:
    220
    Location:
    Sugar Land, Texas
  18. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,936
    Likes Received:
    447
    I am wondering if the Texans are willing to go after a guy like that. He doesn't set the world on fire and isn't much of an upgrade over Bradford and the team has been able to keep the same 4 WR going on 3-4 years. Why would they want to disrupt that chemistry for somebody that is basically not a prime time receiver?
     
  19. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,278
    Likes Received:
    1,473
    So is Williamson. I'm very happy with the way the draft worked out in this regard. Mathis in the 4th (who's just as good an athlete as Williamson) makes more sense than Williamson in the 1st.

    In regards to Rod, I'm not sure he'll even be released. He's the only WR the Skins have with size & his release would save just $1.5 mil against the cap.
     
  20. Ghetto D

    Ghetto D Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, but they need the space to sign their 2 first rounders. For cash strapped teams, $1.5 may be a big deal. Enough to get their picks signed.

    I'm with Vinny in that I have my doubts about it happening, but I would be very happy to see him here. I think he is a big upgrade over Bradford, who hasn't show me anything since the first half of the first seaon. I also think that Gaffney would make an excellent 3rd reciever (Brandon Stokley anyone?), but just isn't ever going to be a quality 2nd WR. If our WR are actual threats, that opens things up for DD and makes things easier for the O-Line.

    With our quick drops we would do well to pick up a possesion reciever like this who can fight for yards after the catch.

    As was mentioned before, he's also a good blocker and would team nicely with AJ, Bruener, and one of the top run-blocking O-Lines to upgrade our running game.
     

Share This Page