Revamping the Conferences.

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Andrew6, Dec 16, 2007.

  1. Andrew6

    Andrew6 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    249
    Location:
    League City
    After looking at all the different conf.'s I've noticed that Houston has a 7-7 record and are at the bottom of their division. In almost every other division that would put them in second place if not in a hunt for 1st in the division.

    Should they swap up some of the divisions to give other teams a chance that are in tough divisions a chance to have play off hopes?

    Would doing this make other teams have to become more competitive? I am just looking to hear some thoughts on this.

    http://www.nfl.com/standings
     
  2. b0ng

    b0ng Ooops

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,897
    Likes Received:
    613
    Somebody here said it best when they said "No, we should be able to beat the Jags and the Titans".

    It's all about parity. This season, the AFC South looks hardcore. Next season, I'm willing to bet that one team in this division will regress (I'm guessing the Colts, but that's just me). Everybody will get their turn, and it just sucks that every team in our division improved (along with us).

    But boy, just think if we were playing in the NFC South. It's plausible that we would be above the Bucs in the division.
     
  3. Andrew6

    Andrew6 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2006
    Messages:
    3,092
    Likes Received:
    249
    Location:
    League City
    no doubt. I hope that Houston is able to improve further than anyone else in the division and all other teams regress.
     
  4. b0ng

    b0ng Ooops

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,897
    Likes Received:
    613
    Personally, I'd still like to beat the Colts, without the excuse of them "resting their starters" when they are contenders.

    I just want to beat the crap out of the Titans because I think this year they have played exceptionally dirty against us.

    I'm just real indifferent to the Jags, their fanbase seems to be the same as well.
     
  5. JayCee

    JayCee Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Collective winning percentages for each division.

    AFC East: 0.442
    AFC North: 0.491
    AFC South: 0.642
    AFC West: 0.415

    NFC East: 0.615
    NFC North: 0.558
    NFC South: 0.423
    NFC West: 0.415

    Only reason NFC South is slightly higher than AFC & NFC West is because they have a game in hand.
     
  6. Txn_in_FL

    Txn_in_FL Lucky 13

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    Messages:
    3,857
    Likes Received:
    384
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Why stop at the NFL? Anytime anyone runs into a little hardship or the need to try a little harder lets just move them somewhere else to make it easier on them.

    The Texans are arguably in the toughest division in the NFL and I like it that way. In the end it is competition and the need to push harder that makes you better.

    Such is life, but that might be a thread for the no spin zone.

    :fans:
     
  7. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,895
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Location:
    Houston
    I've rearranged the NFL by geographical location for you. I might be a bit off, but it's fairly close. Of course, this has nothing to do with the competitive nature of the teams, but I was bored this morning and needed something to do.

    Eastern Football Conference

    New England
    NY Giants
    NY Jets
    Buffalo

    Cincinnati
    Cleveland
    Indianapolis
    Detroit

    Philadelphia
    Washington
    Baltimore
    Pittsburg

    Chicago
    Green Bay
    Minnesota
    St. Louis


    Western Football Conference

    Carolina
    Tampa Bay
    Miami
    Jacksonville

    Atlanta
    New Orleans
    Tennessee
    Houston

    Kansas City
    Dallas
    Arizona
    Denver

    Seattle
    San Diego
    San Francisco
    Oakland
     
  8. GlassHalfFull

    GlassHalfFull Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    7,180
    Likes Received:
    907
    Location:
    Section 353
    Now I just have to be picky here, sorry. But Carolina, Georgia and Florida belong in the East over Ohio and Indiana teams.
     


  9. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,895
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Location:
    Houston
    You're right. The Carolina division should swap places with the Chicago division.

    Or, I could just rename the conferances. LOL
     
  10. Yankee_In_TX

    Yankee_In_TX Dance Lindsay!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    12,448
    Likes Received:
    444
    Location:
    Houston, 77008
    No, because teams eb and flow. You'd have to rearrange the conferences every year or two.
     
  11. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,697
    Likes Received:
    685
    The AFC south hasn't always been the toughest division. It's going to change year to year. there is no point to change things up for reasons of 'giving some teams a chance'. You leave it up to them to make their team better and win. Colts have dominated our division every year, that will eventually come to an end. You just have to roll with the punches.

    The only reason I would consider switching teams into different divisions is geographic location, but I think it's fine how it is now.
     
  12. threetoedpete

    threetoedpete Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Katy, Texas
    The big market teams will never ever give up their traditionl rivalries. Read when hades freezes over. Waist of band wideth guys.
     
  13. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    They just tweaked the divisions a bit when we came into the league, so don't count on it changing any. Strength of division is cyclical...heck, we are the only really "big market" team in our division, but thankfully it doesn't matter that much because the NFL is smarter than MLB when it comes to the big markets and small markets.
     
  14. rockabilly

    rockabilly Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2004
    Messages:
    412
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I think that divisions should be rearranged and rotated every certain number of years, mainly for the sake of change.
     
  15. Speedy

    Speedy Yeller Dweller

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,496
    Likes Received:
    451
    Location:
    The Livable Forest
    Let's take a look at the standings in that setup.

    New England 13-0
    NY Giants 9-4
    Buffalo 7-6
    NY Jets 3-10

    Indianapolis 11-2
    Cleveland 8-5
    Detroit 6-7
    Cincinnati 5-9

    Pittsburgh 9-4
    Washington 6-7
    Philadelphia 5-8
    Baltimore 4-9


    Green Bay 11-2
    Minnesota 7-6
    Chicago 5-8
    St. Louis 3-10


    Western Football Conference

    Jacksonville 9-4
    Tampa Bay 8-5
    Carolina 5-8
    Miami 0-13


    Tennessee 7-6
    Houston 7-7
    New Orleans 6-7
    Atlanta 3-10



    Dallas 12-1
    Arizona 6-7
    Denver 6-8
    Kansas City 4-9



    Seattle 9-4
    San Diego 8-5
    Oakland 4-9
    San Francisco 4-10

    East seedings
    NE-bye
    Ind/GB-bye
    Ind/GB-#3
    Pit-#4
    WC-NYG/Cle

    West
    Dal-bye
    Jac/Sea-bye
    Jac/Sea-#3
    Ten-#4
    WC-SD/TB

    Houston still loses tiebreaker to SD and Ten, but they're just a game out of the 4 seed.

    And it looks like the East may be the dominant conference.
     
  16. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,895
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Location:
    Houston
    Uh guys, I hope you weren't taking my post about reorganizing the divisions seriously. I just did that to kill a little time this morning. LOL

    Although it was interesting the way it turned out. We would be doing pretty good in the division where I placed the Texans.
     
  17. DenverFan

    DenverFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think this is a bad idea in a league that truly seems to achieve parity most every season. You can't just take one season and say the divisions need to be rearranged.
     
  18. Texanmike02

    Texanmike02 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,298
    Likes Received:
    760
    I'm not going to do the math right now but I'm assuming you just averaged the winning % of each team in the division.

    That stat really doesn't tell you anything. The seperation will actually be quite a bit more because what you need to do is take the division games out of the equation if you are trying to measure divisions against one another. Every division is .500 against itself and that skews the numbers pretty badly. For example the AFC south has a 71% winning percentage against other divisions.

    So the divisions over .500 will raise their percentage while those below .500 will lower theirs.

    Mike
     
  19. JayCee

    JayCee Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Point taken about the division games - but it wasn't the average winning % - it was the total number of wins for all four teams divided by the number games the four teams had played. Was curious to see the strength of the teams in the division rather than division vs division.

    But yeah, in hindsight didn't really think this one through enough - FILO_girl's post in the NFL forum is much better http://texanstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45343
     
  20. Speedy

    Speedy Yeller Dweller

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,496
    Likes Received:
    451
    Location:
    The Livable Forest
    It really doesn't make a difference if all divisions are .500 within their own. The differences would still be the same whether you counted those games or not.

    Example: If division one is 20-10 with all games and division 2 is 18-12, that's a 2 game difference. If you take out the division games which would always be a win and a loss within that division, in this example let's say that's 6-6, division 1 is 14-4, division 2 is 12-6, still a 2 game difference.

    Yeah the percentages are much different, but it can be a little misleading doing it that way I think.

    20-10 is .667, 18-12 is .600, difference .067
    14-4 is .778, 12-6 is .667, difference .111

    Makes it look a lot better, but it's still just a 2 game difference.
     

Share This Page