Replacement Refs: Yay or Nay?

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by gtexan02, Sep 6, 2012.

  1. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    I posted this in another thread, but I think it deserves its own thread.

    After watching game 1, how do you feel about the replacement refs? Personally I thought they did a fine job.

    Here is Goodell's stance:
    http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/8344894/nfl-commissioner-roger-goodell-happy-replacement-officials

    Of course he had to say that though.

    Heres the most interesting thing to me:
    Holy crap. $150k for a part time job? I don't get it. What do the cheerleaders get paid again?
     
  2. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    The last thing you want is an official who's living paycheck to paycheck and struggling to make rent. You want them to be well-paid to reduce the possibility of tampering.

    An official making $200,000 for working is not a problem in my book. Especially when the game itself is worth billions.
     
  3. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    The money aspect is really not an issue for me. I don't care.

    What I care about is the product on the field, and last night I don't think the refs took away from the game. And I think as they get more reps they'll get better.

    The regular refs are going to have to give some ground because the league obviously is moving forward without them. Don't want to wait too long and these guys actually show they are decent.
     
  4. Dutchrudder

    Dutchrudder COOL BEANS!

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    15,064
    Likes Received:
    1,332
    Location:
    Houston
    I would love to be an NFL ref, where do you apply? I have 20-20 vision, I'm in good shape, I could do it!
     
  5. ChampionTexan

    ChampionTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,500
    Likes Received:
    705
    While I would absolutely choose to have the regular refs back if it was solely up to me, I'm one of the few who doesn't view a week or two (or a few more) of the replacement refs as the end of the world.

    They made mistakes in preseason, but so do real refs (how many times in previous preseasons have you heard the comment "Preseason's not just for the players" right after a bad call?). I do think improvement had been shown and will continue to be shown.

    It's a level playing field - it's not like some teams are getting NFL refs and some are getting replacement refs, and there's always replay for some of the things they may get wrong.

    I honestly believe the uproar in the preseason was a product of group-think as much as anything. A few folks, some objective, some with a hidden agenda, predict NFL armageddon, and analysts, commentators, journalists and ex-players who are in a position to spout off about it jump on the bandwagon (not to mention all those tweeters). I also believe that there's a significant faction out there that due to the handling of bounty-gate, the changing/enforcement of the rules in the name of player safety, or the discipline imposed on certain players (mostly for on field actions) believe the NFL/Roger Goodell is satan, and want very much for the replacement officials to fail miserably. While I have both agreements and disagreements with those folks, even if I concede they're 100% correct, there's not really a cause and effect relationship between the NFL being satan and the replacement refs sucking.

    I'm not really taking sides on the dispute It will eventually be resolved, and I don't care who wins - I'm just happy to have real NFL football back regardless of who's officiating games.
     
  6. disaacks3

    disaacks3 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2004
    Messages:
    11,281
    Likes Received:
    911
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    The replacement refs, for the most part, let them play. It was painful to watch receivers getting mugged all night though. The more aggressively a team tries to take things, the better off they will be with replacement refs. Finesse teams will get clobbered until the "real" refs come back.

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  7. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    In America, unfortunately, salary seems to have nothing to do with living paycheck to paycheck. That said, you can easily live on $100k a year. Very comfortably. You can easily live on $75k a year. I can't believe they could make $200k for a part time job.
     
  8. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    It's an important job. Whether it's part-time or not is irrelevant. $200k's not THAT much.
     


  9. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    1 million isn't that much either.
     
  10. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    To whom? The median household income in the US is somewhere around $45,000 a year. $200k alone would put you in the 97% percentile for all earners in the US. If you assume they have a second job that puts them into the top 1% of all earners.

    I agree that athletes deserve the high salaries they get--because they are unique. And because they sacrifice physically. But what does a ref do that's so unique?
    They don't spend anywhere near the amount of time or risk their bodies the way the players do.

    A ref theoretically works 17-19 games a year correct? For something that basically anyone could be trained to do? It doesn't require any truly unique ability or intelligence.

    Why does a cheerleader earn $100 a game or something of that nature? They at least have unique physical attributes that lowers the amount of people who could qualify.

    Im not trying to make this into a class warfare issue-- because NFL players are so unique they deserve a huge share of the revenue they create. But the refs? eh

    Really it doesn't matter. Just guess I'm surprised that they are risking losing their jobs over a $50k pay bump when they are already getting paid pretty handsomely...
     
  11. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Yeah, but a million here and a million there and pretty soon, you're talking about real money. (To paraphrase Senator Dirksen.)
     
  12. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Are you seriously comparing the importance of a referee to the importance of a cheerleader? Not even all teams HAVE cheerleaders. They're not important to the game at all.

    But the refs are PLAYERS in the game. They are a part of the game. Without them, the game turns into the WWF or WWE or whatever it's called. Not everyone can do what they do. It's a hard job. And it's not just what happens on the field.

    Those refs are supposed to be the best of the best.

    As part of the game, they deserve to benefit from the popularity of the sport and they deserve to get paid relative to that popularity. Personally, I'd prefer if they were full-time officials and I'd prefer that they get paid double. I'd expect them to make at least what a minimum-wage vet makes.
     
  13. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    I'm not comparing them by saying that they should have the same salary-- I'm just using the cheerleader example to illustrate the fact that not everything associated with the team needs to make an elite salary.
    The players and the owners deserve the money they earn. They are the ones that risk themselves financially and physically.

    I'd put refs a very distant 3rd in terms of importance. As we saw last night, all you need is a semi-competent replacement and your fine. The head ref has been a ref for arena league 2 and small colleges and he stepped in admirably. Give him a full 16 game season and he'd be good to go.

    I just don't agree. They are too easily replaceable. a minimum wage vet is worth a lot more to the game because of his unique ability than a ref. You take all the currently employed NFL players out of the league and put in replacements and you have a totally different experience. You take all the currently employed refs out and replace them and the result is almost the same as it was before. In a few weeks it could be exactly the same

    I just don't see anything unique about our current referees except experience. I put them just a notch above the guys who take care of the fields and the equipment. They are instrumental to the game but really almost anyone could do the job if they were given the proper training and experience. You can't say that about a vet earning the minimum

    Serious question: IF the NFL never reaches a deal with the current refs do you think next year would be quantifiably (is that a word?) different than 2011? When the replacements would have had a full year of experience
     
  14. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    I like the way cak put it in another thread when he said "normal".

    Replace all the players and it's going to take a lot longer for the game to feel normal again.

    Replace the refs and not many people outside of die hard football fans even notice.

    My grandmother watches all the texans games and if Andre or Arian weren't out there shed ask me what happened to them. If Ed hockley isn't out there she's not going to notice or care.

    Refs are overplaying their hand trying to hold out like the players did. I'm not going to comment on what I think they should earn as I just don't know and really don't care, but they need to realize that out of all the elements that have to do with the actual game they are the most replaceable.
     
  15. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Yes, 'quantifiably' is a word.

    I believe we're going to have problems THIS YEAR with these refs. We are going to have more poorly officiated games. I believe several games will be decided by screw-ups by the refs.

    I believe that if we continue to use these refs, they will improve. In time, they'll be just as good as the old guys.

    BUT... they're also going to be getting paid that same amount that you don't agree with. These guys are not going to be paid $20,000 a year for a part-time job of officiating, their salary is going to increase up to that $100,000-$200,000/year range and maybe more.
     
  16. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,001
    Likes Received:
    1,489
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    And I agree with all of this.

    The refs are not in a position of strength and they're overplaying their hand. They make less money than an undrafted free agent rookie. In the grand scheme of things, they're not that important and they are replaceable.

    They're hoping for some real stinker mistakes and some fan outrage.
     
  17. EllisUnit

    EllisUnit Serving Koolaid

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,526
    Likes Received:
    380
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Dont cheerleaders only make like 50 bucks per game. I think NFL cheerleaders use the NFL as a gateway to bigger and better things anyways. But the contribute more that refs anyways ;)
     
  18. b0ng

    b0ng Ooops

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    7,889
    Likes Received:
    613
    There was like hugely blatant holding by both offensive lines all night Wednesday, and that was the "best" crew they have. Sunday afternoon games are going to be wretched in terms of officiating performance and that is not hyperbole.
     
  19. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,152
    Likes Received:
    1,950
    As long as their mistakes are comparable to the regular refs' mistakes, I don't care. Subjectivity leads to lots of calls that people complain about. That's one thing. When you make basic rules and procedures mistakes, it's pretty clear you just don't know your job.

    Couldn't care less about the money. If you can get it, good for you. I find it hypocritical to ***** about the money the refs are making while ignoring what the people who pay the refs are making.
     
  20. HOU-TEX

    HOU-TEX Ah, Football!

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Messages:
    16,137
    Likes Received:
    1,089
    Location:
    P-land
    I thought the refs sucked the other night. It was like a sumo match in the trenches. All the grabbing and even tackling to the ground type holding. A "clipping" (are we in little league) on the kickoff that was just a block in the back after watching the replay.

    That said, they were not a factor in the outcome of the game. Which is fine by me
     

Share This Page