Regression?

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by welsh texan, Jan 15, 2013.

  1. welsh texan

    welsh texan Lest we forget

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    185
    Location:
    Llandudno, Wales
    Seeing a lot of people claiming we regressed this season. I'm not so sure.

    As far as regular season record goes, we improved, fwiw.
    In the playoffs we lost in the same round but to a much, much stronger opponent. I don't see any regression in terms of results there. Probably a slight step forward if anything.

    As for any problems that you think you saw with the eye test...what new problems have come up? The D was decimated by injury all season long, our best lb, best cb, slot cb, dt all missing significant time. Same with our #3 S who we use plenty. Whilst we still battled to an improved record we had chance to give PT to lots of younger guys giving them a boost in their development over the offseason and allowing the coaches to find out exactly what they've got and what to replace.

    On O we already knew Matts limitations, we already knew Kubes' issues, we lost our 2 experienced guys on the right side of the Oline early on, whether they'd lost the camp battles or not, you have to consider they knew the system and would have been in the rotation. We got plenty if guys in the mix to develop our young talent ahead of time. I see a win there.

    We also managed to use Graham effectively for his first season featuring so much, the young group at WR may not have set the world alight but they all got experience that will aid their development.

    The draft class of last year has me quietly confident too, Merci can develop and handled limited responsibility fairly well, the 2 wrs can both develop, Crick is promising as is Jones on the Oline.

    So where's the regression?
     
  2. Texecutioner

    Texecutioner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,353
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    Were people saying this when we were 10-1? Nope, not a word. The majority were claiming that we were going to the SB and that we were the team to beat. Now our team regressed as a whole. Lol!

    Sorry, but they did not regress. They improved, but they just collapsed at the end of the season on offense completely. They had bad coaching is what happened. They had a great team that began to believe their own hype and didn't handle adversity well at all. Those are things that the HC has to change.
     
    Surreal McCoy likes this.
  3. Surreal McCoy

    Surreal McCoy All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Messages:
    505
    Likes Received:
    48
    QFT Although I would assert the defence had shown signs of serious stress fractures against anything other than the mildest of opponents starting in week 3.

    MSR.
     
  4. welsh texan

    welsh texan Lest we forget

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,708
    Likes Received:
    185
    Location:
    Llandudno, Wales
    I totally agree. And when has the mentality of the HC ever not been under scrutiny? It's been there all along, just the words used have changed, it used to be soft or finesse, now it's risk averse and too loyal.

    I genuinely do not believe I found out anything new about this team this season, or the past 6 weeks, that is any worse than what I already knew.

    I saw a picture of 2 guys wearing matching coats 6 weeks ago and I just knew what was happening. Even before the first NE game. I even saw AJ telling his team-mates to enjoy being #1 while it lasted and I didn't like it. I bet the Cards enjoyed being #1 4 months ago too.

    But all that said, we knew what they were long ago didn't we? This season was a step forward, and dare I hope those lessons about mentality, now that its been the difference between a good season and a great season, instead of the difference between 8-8 or 9-7, or making the wildcard and not making the wildcard...maybe they'll finally get with the programme now?
     
  5. Tailgate

    Tailgate Fall of Hame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,178
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Houston, TX - Born and raised
    Amplified by the loss of Cushing... The minute we lost him it was always going to be hard to improve off of last seasons playoffs. Losing @ Indy and losing HFA only furthered the chances of not improving past Divisional playoffs. Had we not lost Cush, I think we hang on to HFA and we are hosting AFC Championship playoff this weekend imo.
     
  6. Corrosion

    Corrosion Idealist

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    33,385
    Likes Received:
    1,451
    Location:
    Northwest Houston
    Um , I can name two of us who were complaining of many of the issues the rest of you are now when the team was 10-1.


    I believe that was stated after the victory over the Jaguars in week 11 when we werecomplaining about how poorly they played.



    They didnt have bad coaching or playcalling they had bad QB play - the two arent joined at the hip.
     
  7. Kaiser Toro

    Kaiser Toro Native Mod

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,245
    Likes Received:
    1,166
    Location:
    Straight Outta Austin
    No regression in the win column, but ceiling has been reached. The last six games of last year and the last six games of this year speak for themselves.

     
    Vinny likes this.
  8. fiasco west

    fiasco west Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    107
    I don't see how a ceiling has been reached...same for any team.

    You either get better or worse in the NFL as they say, Texans will certainly lose players in the offseason and coaches and will replace those players...it remains to be seen if those changes benefit us or harm us.

    But who knows what happens next year? Maybe Mercilus has a breakout year and Cush comes back looking like Peterson? Who knows?

    Either way I don't think a ceiling has been reached, at the same time they can obviously get worse...
     
    Corrosion likes this.


  9. Playoffs

    Playoffs Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    20,850
    Likes Received:
    1,483
    I see it more as a result of subtraction. Subtraction of key O-line members, subtraction of Dreessen, subtraction of Cushing.

    I do think Barwin, Reed, Manning regressed.
     
  10. EllisUnit

    EllisUnit Serving Koolaid

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    7,591
    Likes Received:
    407
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    I tthink they mean the ceiling has been reached with 2 important components of this team. The QB and the Head coach
     
  11. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,350
    Likes Received:
    2,067
    I hadn't thought about it before, but yeah, there was some regression. At least, there was in certain areas. I say that because I think the team was better last year. The OL was better, the run game was better, the defense as a whole was better, and special teams was better, even if not great. Then you have Schaub. I think he was better until the second half of this season. Frankly, I think Yates was as good or better last year than Schaub has been over the past six games. Prior to that, Schaub was clearly better.

    Watt was a monster this year, but the overall pass rush was better last year. The secondary has been better this year overall IMO, but JJo was better last year. The linebackers were a ton better last year. The OL was better in both facets. The TEs were better. The FB was better. The WRs were worse because AJ was injured.

    I can see the argument for regression. How that fits into this year's schedule and circumstances vs. last year's is anyone's guess, and clearly the record is different. But I think most people would agree that last year's TEAM was better, irrespective of a couple key positions.
     
  12. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,447
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Every year is a different year.

    Last year, we had a great opportunity because the Patriots were more vulnerable and our offense was (with Schaub at the helm) more potent.

    BUT. Schaub was not at the helm at the end of last season.

    We progressed this year. We ended up with a better regular season record. We ended up with higher expectations. And we collapsed at the end of the season.

    Are we going to regress next year? Maybe, maybe not. Depends on the moves we make over the offseason and how lucky we are.

    This is about an organization learning to win and growing into being a perennial winner. We've been jealous of the Colts and all those winning seasons they put together. Well, hopefully, we're at the beginning of one of those runs.
     
  13. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,368
    Likes Received:
    657
    The Texans regressed. The regular season record improved, but the team had Dre and Schaub all year which balances out Cushing. The schedule wasn't as tough as last year, so that makes the better record a bit easier to reach.

    Losing in the same round of the playoffs isn't better, and the Cushing excuse doesn't fly - again, they had Dre and Schaub this time.

    They lost talent and depth last year due to the salary cap, and it wasn't replaced adequately by backups and the draft as was hoped by many. The talent is less.

    The coaching is as uninspiring and sometimes clueless as it was three years ago when Kubiak should have been fired. The lack of growth there is regression, because Kubiak has a lot of room for growth and he isn't growing.

    The Colts got better fast. Even if one can convince themselves the Texans are stagnant rather than regressing compared to last year's squad, they are definitely regressing relative to the division, and probably compared to other elite teams.

    At least that's my opinion.
     
    eriadoc and Textan like this.
  14. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,350
    Likes Received:
    2,067
    http://www.texanstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2064287#post2064287

    Here's another:

     
  15. fiasco west

    fiasco west Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    107
    Maybe.

    But coaches get better and worse. Some of them change and adjust and some of them just remain the same. Nothing says that Kubiak won't change, we only assume that on history and I blame no one for thinking that Kubiak can't improve as a coach.

    I'm just saying, every year is different and for a NFL team it is hard to say the ceiling has been reached. I do think there is a ceiling with this team and it is relative to how much longer can AJ be a top 10 WR (he's still top 5...) because replacing that guy is going to be difficult!

    I mean it just goes both ways. Watt will be lucky if he has another season like he did last season, you can argue that he's played as well as he could and the only way to go from there is down...Just don't tell Watt that!
     
  16. deucetx

    deucetx All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    75
    Let's look at this way...

    Last year we had Yates and for a short period Leinart man six games for us. We were also missing Dre for quite some time last year. And now compare last year's passing offense to this year:


    2011 - 3506 passing yards, 20 toucdowns, 9 interceptions, 7.0 Net Yards Per Attempt

    2012 - 3830 passings yards, 22 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, 6.6 Net Yards Per Attempt

    Sorry...but there is barely any difference. We had our starting quarterback and star receiver (only receiver really) all season long and got barely any different production. That is not progress. The offense should have expanded in some sort of way.

    Now add the rushing offense:

    2011 - 2448 yards, 18 touchdowns, 4.5 average
    2012 - 2123 yards, 19 touchdowns, 4.2 average

    Again...where is the progress? The running game took a step back. We all know it probably had more to do with the right side of the line than anything. Losing Butler in the preseason (we only lost one guy during that time by the way) meant little to nothing. Newton isn't a rookie so he knows the system and he beat out Butler before the injury. In other words, he was better than Butler (barely) and he still wasn't that good himself. Kind of says something about Butler who is generally injury prone at this point anyway.

    Last year we had a more 'consistent' offense even if just mainly the run game. It had a double threat with Foster and Tate we didn't have this season. It was productive more often than not while it seemed to vanish too many times this year. The passing game didn't take a strong step forward that some would have expected with Schaub and Dre. The defense went from elite to just above average.

    We had injuries but you know what...we'll have them again. Part of the game. Some of the injuries weren't heavy impacting. Our 3rd CB McCain? He regressed this season compared to last year. He was freaking horrible before getting hurt. Harris wasn't great but he actually did better then McCain so his injury meant little in the way of things. Demps injury? Same guy who got benched toward the end of the year for blowing coverages in favor of Shiloh Keo who can't cover what so ever. Cody injury? The same guy many think needs to be replaced. Mitchell is just as good as he is and they barely see the field anyway. Mitchell would see it more in passing situations because he's faster than Cody.
     
  17. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,447
    Likes Received:
    1,640
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    I disagree with that.

    I think we had a tougher schedule this year than we did last year. Just by record, our opponents this year were 127-129 while last year they were 116-140.

    We had a 4-4 record against teams with winning records this year and those teams had a combined record of 88-40 and a 3-2 record against winning teams last year and they had a combined record of 64-32.

    Last year was the year where we were feasting on weak opponents.
     
  18. Texecutioner

    Texecutioner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,353
    Likes Received:
    1,022
    Sure there may have been a post or two, but I'm talking about the majority. Especially those that went bonkers the minute we lost the 2nd game of the season as if they needed professional help or something with a two loss team. I posted a thread on Thanksgiving called "Same ole Sorry Kubiak" which I posted during the game not knowing if they would win or lose. I posted the thread, because Gary showed his ass once again by putting the team in a bad position and caused the team to lose. Luckily for them they didn't lose due to the Lions being unable to execute and take advantage, but I was disgusted at the fact that Gary still hadn't learned from all of his previous mistakes that killed this team in previous years. Now in that thread, I was told to shut up by about 90% of the forum that elected to post in that thread. Everyone said shut up we're 10-1 blah blah blah!!! No one seemed to have a worry in the world. I sat back laughing, because I knew that if the outcome of the game was different despite the close score and everything else those same people would have been flipping out and criticizing Gary just as much. However, the Lions didn't execute and everyone wanted to act like Gary's awful play calling that caused the FG kicker to go out there and miss didn't even happen. The majority of time winning makes people forget or ignore what they see or notice in a game.







    If you're going to tell me that there wasn't poor coaching, well I don't know what to tell ya. One bad play isn't on coaching. A ton of bad plays all over the field from quarter one to quarter 4 is on coaching.
     
  19. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,703
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    Where are you getting Matt's stats? He had 350/544 for 4,008 yds @ 7.37 64.3% and 22 TDS 12 INTs http://espn.go.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/5615/matt-schaub
    http://www.nfl.com/player/mattschaub/2505982/profile
     
  20. deucetx

    deucetx All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    75

Share This Page