Question on Lions being charged with a time out

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Hookem Horns, Oct 20, 2008.

  1. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    I was at the game yesterday so I didn't have any TV commentary going on. Here is what I didn't understand. The Lions challenged the spot on Schaub's 4th and 1 sneak up the middle. The review indicated that the call on the field was incorrect and the ball had to be respotted. However even after the respot the Texans still had enough for the 1st down.

    While the Lions didn't get the outcome they wanted (being short of the 1st down marker) the call on the field was still changed showing the Lions were right for challenging the spot. With that in mind why were the Lions charged a time out for challenging a play that was changed after review? Technically they only challenged the spot.
     
  2. RTP2110

    RTP2110 Thank You Andre

    Joined:
    May 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,023
    Likes Received:
    131
    Location:
    Atascocita
    I think it depends on if they challened the ball spot or the 1st down. It might be 2 seperate things. Just guessin, tho.
     
  3. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    All the ref announced in the stadium is "the Lions are challenging the spot on the field". However I don't know if there is some rule that states to challenge the spot something else must occur, like the other team being short of a first down as a result of the challenge.
     
  4. Tyrlq

    Tyrlq Waterboy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everything I heard was that they challenged the 1st down and not the spot of the ball. Since the 1st down didn't change, they lost the timeout. Had the challenged the actual spot, they would've won the challenge.
     
  5. mexican_texan

    mexican_texan Furry Tractors

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    14,192
    Likes Received:
    515
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    They challenged whether the spot on the field resulted in a first down.
     
  6. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    First of all welcome to the board!

    Well, you have to challenge the spot in that situation. There is no other basis to challenge the first down. I was just wondering if someone watching the game on TV heard any other commentary on that.
     
  7. Tyrlq

    Tyrlq Waterboy

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2007
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thx!

    TV commentary more or less kept saying what you just said, the challenge should've been the spot of the ball. However, they did state that the actual challenge was for the 1st down. The only thing I can think of is that Detroit figured by challenging the 1st down, they expected the ball to be moved back in order to win the challenge. Unfortunately for them they worded the challenge wrong resulting in a loss of a challenge while the ball was also moved. One of those by the letter of the law scenarios.
     
  8. ChampionTexan

    ChampionTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,617
    Likes Received:
    758
    The only time you can challenge a spot is if there is a first down involved. That means that challenging the spot and challenging the first down is one and the same.

    Here's a link to a similar circumstance that explains it:

    LINK
     
    RTP2110 likes this.


  9. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    Thanks, that sums it up and answers the question. It makes sense because coaches would be challenging spots in all sorts of situations.
     
  10. TexansLucky13

    TexansLucky13 53d Signal Batt

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,783
    Likes Received:
    295
    Location:
    Maryland
    I haven't heard much press about it, which is surprising. I expect the league to give a big apology to the Lions soon, especially since that timeout could have influenced the outcome of the game.
     
  11. WesmanTexanfan

    WesmanTexanfan SeNior Smack

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    138
    Location:
    Braeswood area
    They explained it on the radio today, Mark V came on with Matt Jackson and Rich Lord. Basically If you challange the spot of a ball, the result has to be a change of down or you lose a timeout. The reason being so that coaches arnt throwing red flags all game to challenege 4 inches to 2 feet of field without it beinng a dire situation(I.E. when a 3rd and 15 spot should have been 3rd and 16).
     
  12. WesmanTexanfan

    WesmanTexanfan SeNior Smack

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    4,986
    Likes Received:
    138
    Location:
    Braeswood area
    they made the right call....
     
  13. TexansLucky13

    TexansLucky13 53d Signal Batt

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,783
    Likes Received:
    295
    Location:
    Maryland
    Two more gears clanked in my tired, distracted mind and I realize that they truly should've lost the timeout.

    Carry on.
     
  14. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    Prediction:

    Next game, Kubiak throws the red flag over 4 inches regarding spot of ball on about 2nd and 8. :cool:
     
  15. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Off the subject some, but not entirely. I think we got a real break on the interferance call on AJ in the EZ vs. the non-call on our DB when he ran into the Lions WR deep into our end of the field because I thought that was closer to interance than the call on the guy defending against AJ ?
     

Share This Page