Poll: Hypothetical Question-- Draft Wise

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Toro, Jan 12, 2007.

?

Russell or Peterson?

  1. Adrian Peterson

    32 vote(s)
    66.7%
  2. JaMarcus Russell

    16 vote(s)
    33.3%
  1. Toro

    Toro Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    9
    In a previous post, I've discussed the possibility of Adrian Peterson and JaMarcus Russell falling to the Texans at 8.

    Before you dismiss it entirely, check out the thread and read how the draft breaks down based off needs.. It's NOT entirely an unrealistic possibility that both could fall.

    So, with that said.. Let's play GM.. Hypothetically, the draft plays out with these two being on the board at 8.. Which one do you pick? Do you go with the raw, but ultra talented QB? Or, do you go with the superstar potential, but "injury prone" HB?
     
  2. Coach C.

    Coach C. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    SE Houston
    First I go with this should probably be in the Draft Forum, then after that I look at who will help us win more right now. Talentwise they are pretty similar and both have very high ceilings. Jamarcus Russell has a cannon for an arm and is fairly mobile, but his decision making is questionable at times. That is likely due to his youth and the fact that he has a cannon for an arm. His footwork can be very bad at times, but overall I think he should be the top QB taken in the draft. True I do like Brohm maybe a little better, but they are so close and you factor in the ceiling and Russell is the guy.

    Peterson is a kid that I really like. I think in our ZBS system, especially once ran correctly and effectively he could put up serious numbers. He would give us a RB that teams have to respect and gameplan for. Right now most teams gameplan to keep DC in the pocket and double AJ, well that made the middle of the season long and very dissapointing. Either way, Peterson to me is not overly injury prone, he has had some injuries, but nothing that is nagging or needs to be worried about. He will need to be taught to get his pad level lower as he started doing this season, but once again his ceiling is so high that you cant really miss.

    Both prospects are very talented, but Peterson helps us win now so he would have to be my pick.
     
  3. U4ikrob

    U4ikrob Guitar Junky

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    428
    Likes Received:
    16
    Adrian Peterson is my pick.

    IMO in the WCO and Kubes system you need a Game manager who can run the offense effectively overall, limit mistakes and work inside the system as a QB more than a playmaker. A veteran QB should be able to handle that much easier as reading an NFL level defense will be paramount for success. Overall IMO You need playmakers at the RB, WR and TE positions to make the offense work well and thus I would go with the RB as a pick between the two.
     
  4. STEEL BLUE TEXANS

    STEEL BLUE TEXANS Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,838
    Likes Received:
    220
    Location:
    Sugar Land, Texas
    I went with Peterson as well. You'd be hard pressed to find a better fit at running back for our zone blocking scheme.
     
  5. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    AD all day
     
  6. Silver Oak

    Silver Oak Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    3,620
    Likes Received:
    304
    Location:
    The Woodlands
    I wouldn't take either, but I answered the poll with Russell.

    We need to think longer term for this franchise and not short term. No matter whats happened in the past, this team needs to crawl, then walk, and then we can run.

    Russell is a project and the rest of DC's contract time would be an ideal training time on the bench.

    Draft DL, OL, or DB.

    Go Texans!
     
  7. BattleRedToro

    BattleRedToro Thread Killer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    201
    you should add two other options:

    other player, or
    trade down

    or you could just add the single option:

    neither

    which would encompass both the trade down and the drafting a different player possibilities.

    Either way that is how I would vote neither preferably trading down.
     
  8. santo

    santo Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,979
    Likes Received:
    196
    Location:
    Pasadena, TX
    I picked Russell. I think it's time we start thinking about a new quarterback. I say let the Texans do it right this time. We either let go of Carr and play Rosenfels throughout the 2007 season, or we just let Carr play the rest of his contract and allow Russell a year and half to develop and learn from the sidelines.

    Adrian Peterson will probably bring instant results, but I want the Texans to start developing a new franchise quarterback. But I would be happy with either one anyway.

    :twocents:
     


  9. Kaiser Toro

    Kaiser Toro Native Mod

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,249
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Location:
    Straight Outta Austin
    Peterson all dern day long.
     
  10. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    I love both. I put Russell just for the fact that I want Carr gone and think our best plan this year is to get another vet in here to play and then have Russell or someone like him learning for a year. That isn't saying that I don't want a back and don't think Peterson won't be a stud. I just think we need to look at the team down the road and we need someone who can lead and make plays at the QB position. Although I'm not sure of his "intangibles" when it comes to different things. I don't think we can go wrong.
     
  11. kastofsna

    kastofsna Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,438
    Likes Received:
    245
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    peterson.
     
  12. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,387
    Likes Received:
    2,085
    Option C - Offensive Line or Secondary.
     
  13. real

    real Guest

    Peterson.
     
  14. Meloy

    Meloy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    48
    I agree with your post. Still think we need to get a left tackle though.
     
  15. Meloy

    Meloy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Messages:
    1,834
    Likes Received:
    48
    AP in 1st and Kolb in 2nd would do what you want. We can run a verticle offense with our receivers and TEs especially if we have a break away type back. Dayne will help with short yardage and red zones. :snobord:
     
  16. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,033
    Likes Received:
    557
    1. left tackle is not a choice of this hypothetical Question

    2. after Thomas, unless you consider Gaithers, value is not there w/8th pick

    3. the Texans will have to aquire a top LT via free agency or trade

    4. develop one from latter rounds

    5. hope that Spencer recovers 100%

    having said that, Peterson would be my pick :shades:
     
  17. kiwitexansfan

    kiwitexansfan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,569
    Likes Received:
    494
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    We aren't going to be running a vertical offense while Kubiak is coach, it isn't his bag baby.

    As for the poll question, my theory is that when you have two players of equal ability with equal positional needs you take the one in which that position is hardest to fill. In my mind both QB and HB have adequate players in them in terms of need but QB beats HB in difficuly to fill position, therefore Russell is my pick.
     
  18. Champ

    Champ Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2006
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    2
    Peterson seems more of a need for the Texans than Russell. Peterson would take pressure off of Carr.

    Peterson no doubt.
     
  19. threetoedpete

    threetoedpete Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Katy, Texas
    Yep you left me with no one to vote for. What he said. :shades:
     
  20. Smokedawg

    Smokedawg Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    262
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Jena, Louisiana
    It really shouldnt be close. Russel has alot head of him and Peterson is just an injury prone back. Where we pick Russel wont be there but for the question no doubt Russel
     

Share This Page