Peek-a-boo-peek and "More tatoos than tackles" Babin!

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by JDTexan, Sep 11, 2005.

  1. JDTexan

    JDTexan Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    No they are not the answers to the Texans pass rush!

    Did you notice that Peak would try the same move over and over again. He would spin once and then wonder what to do next.

    Where were our inside linebackers? "Mercelous" Marlon and "Wong way Wong!"

    We look worse than our first year as an expansion team. :bag:

    I won't waste my time on talking about our ridiculous offense. I'm sure there will be plenty of threads on that one.
     
  2. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    think we look for linebackers in the next draft?
     
  3. toronado

    toronado Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    I would love to hear an explanation from anyone regarding why there was ever a reason for optimism with these two guys.
     
  4. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,463
    Likes Received:
    988
    Wong was terrible as well. Greenwood? Was he out there? You could have fooled me. Babin and Peek were awful. They were outcoached, outplayed, and out muscled in every phase of the game.
     
  5. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,346
    Likes Received:
    837
    Location:
    Maryland
    Yes, over and over.
     
  6. TexSon

    TexSon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,112
    Likes Received:
    10
    Truthfully, I think it is Fangio's ridiculous read and react rush 4 and drop everybody else back into soft zone with inside linebackers covering WR's 25 yards downfield defensive style, more so than a lack of talent on the defense.
    Regardless, everybody needs to step it up.
     
  7. gr8slayer

    gr8slayer Guest

    Im curious to know what happened to that revamped Defense I heard about all week? Losman still has a clean jersey.
     
  8. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    I thought the inside linebackers played worse than the outside linebackers. I thought Babin had a decent game. Carr and the offense is what stunk it up. Carr was horrible.
     


  9. Reddevil63

    Reddevil63 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,253
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Arlington
    You and everybody else who were filled up with false hopes from our ****** coaches we still blindly follow.
     
  10. kbourda

    kbourda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    I don't think the "D" was bad at all. The Bills had 5 fg's. 42 points is bad "D".
     
  11. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,346
    Likes Received:
    837
    Location:
    Maryland
    Couldnt agree more. D is the only thing that looked good.
     
  12. Goldeagle

    Goldeagle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Spring

    Why did we let SHARPER go and give a big contract to Wong??
     
  13. awtysst

    awtysst Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,611
    Likes Received:
    497
    Carr was bad, but the Oline was horrendous. Every few plays the Bills would blitz, Carr get sacked and then our brillaint coaching minds would call a draw play on 2nd and 20.
     
  14. BuffSoldier

    BuffSoldier Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
    Maybe if we brought more than a 4 man rush, we could get some pressure. i thought that was the point of a 3-4, having 3 down lineman so that you could do all kind of exotic stuf with the 4 LBs. Well at least we won on my XBOX.
     
  15. awtysst

    awtysst Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,611
    Likes Received:
    497

    At least SOMEBODY was a winner!
     
  16. touttail

    touttail All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    948
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Baytown
    Seemed like every time we blitzed, they would run by Losman or he would run by them!

    bobby 119C :brickwall
     
  17. Cincinnatikid

    Cincinnatikid Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    3
    Peek was not that bad today, he didnt get a sack but he didnt screw up really other than the dropped INT. He kept his contain the entire game and forced McGahee back to the middle. THe lack of pass rush was due to the Bills being intelligent and using short drops and roll outs to the right side. Maybe the pass rush was not the fault of the players on the Texans as much as the good play calling of the Bills
     
  18. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    The o-line wasn't near as bad as Carr, and Carr makes them look worse than they really are. Carr doesn't know how to step up in the pocket or throw the ball away from the pocket. A better QB makes the line look a lot better.
     
  19. Yea, like Banks. Sure we can put him in and him get nailed like he did last time to knock him out of the season. Face it man, the oline is horrible, everyone can see this but you.
     
  20. ledzeppelin229

    ledzeppelin229 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    6,829
    Likes Received:
    314
    Location:
    Spring / San Marcos, TX
    I'm watching the tape again, and yes it's difficult but it's better than watching the Cowboys.

    So far I have what I think is both Greenwood and Wong biting hard on the run fake, and then Greenwood getting beat in coverage of a TE. This is with 5:34 left in the first on consecutive plays.
     

Share This Page