NFL.com has us as 7th best roster depth

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by barrett, Jul 21, 2008.

  1. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
  2. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,613
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    I've been waiting a long time for us to become one of those teams.

    Seems to me that both Walter and Davis could start for another team, but whatever. Actually, what I've been thinking is let's get DRob and Spencer healthy and then we've got ourselves some serious depth. Course, half the team may be injured by then. :tomato:
     
  3. Toro59

    Toro59 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    2
    agreed

    so do we have two starting caliber tight ends? Bruener???
     
  4. gtal98

    gtal98 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Palmyra, VA
    Dreesen seems to be capable, but has had very limited reps so far to really judge him.
     
  5. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    I think dreesen as a starter is a stretch for the reason stated above. Bruener? No way.
     
  6. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,273
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Actually, I think that the Texans could be functional without Owen Daniels. Sort of in the same way you think that the Texans could still put up running yards without their starting running back (which could quite possibly happen). Whether Dreesen or Bruener could start for other teams is a different question. But for a system offense, I think Dreesen/Bruener are good depth.

    The bigger problems for depth I believe are on the defensive side of the ball. How many players on the defensive side of the ball would you consider to be above average for their position?
     
  7. brakos82

    brakos82 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    19,847
    Likes Received:
    977
    Location:
    LOHAR (Land of Hipsters and Rain)
    3 as of now: Mario, Meco, Greenwood, Bennett (as a #2), Dunta.
     
  8. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,062
    Likes Received:
    809
    Location:
    Maryland
    I have no issue with being elimanted based on can our 3rd string WR start elsewhere. Davis has never been on to start elsewhere and who knows what we really have in Jacoby (little more than flashes of preseason talent that has become a fan favorite).
     
  9. TexansSeminole

    TexansSeminole Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    8,781
    Likes Received:
    400
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    Couldn't agree more. Our depth at defensive end is really bad. If Mario were to get injured we would have a serious problem getting to the QB. I think next year we need to consider using one of our first day picks (rounds 1 + 2) on a defensive end.

    College DEs I will be watching alot of this year:

    FSU - Everette Brown, redshirt junior
    USF - George Selvie, quite possibly the #1 DE, except he is only a junior
    Georgia Tech - Michael Johnson, very disruptive at 6'6 250.
     
  10. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    20,671
    Likes Received:
    1,449
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain

    That's a pretty confusing quote right there. 3== 5?
     
  11. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,062
    Likes Received:
    809
    Location:
    Maryland
    It was written by brakos - what else did you expect?
     
  12. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    well the elimination factor was weather or not the depth was starter potential. at least as it pertains to WR. I'm assuming that that was the theory behind a backup TE as well. Is Dreesen or Bruener a starter at TE on another team? I don't think so. As I said before, Davis is borderline. Maybe for the Tacks or Jax.

    When we move to Defense it drops of drastically because of unanswered questions. Who would be starter potential at DE? Bulman? Maybe, maybe not. Kalu is a no. DT: could Maddox start for anyone in the league? I don't know. Certianly not a shoe in. Weaver maybe could but it's not fair to list him as depth at DT when he's starting at DE. As soon as you get to the LB's and CB's it's a totally mystery. I think that says our depth is questionable because they are unanswered questions. Maybe after some playing time we might find that they are serviceable and we are one of the deepest teams in the league but right now it's hard to say that defensively we have any certain starter quality depth.

    All that said, I think we potentially could have one of the deepest teams in the league but I have little more than totally biased opinion to go on!
     
  13. ArlingtonTexan

    ArlingtonTexan Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,159
    Likes Received:
    465
    I think the texans have quite a few players and positions where there is not a significant dropoff between the starter and back-ups so we depth. Running back and safety come to mind. it may not mean that the play of the position is excellent, but not getting worse is a good thing.

    That said, during the off-season, i know several threads addressed the issue that the texans were trying to improve the back portion of the roster say player 35-53 versus make big name splahes. a deeper roster can help overcome injury, when (not if) it hits.
     
  14. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    There has never been a Shanahan/Kubiak offense that doesn't have a feature TE with the speed/savvy to split a cover two and block. That's not Bruener. It might be Dreessen. It is Daniels.

    FB is another position in this offense that's tremendoulsy important but people tend to overlook.

    The Texans roster is getting harder to make, which was Kubiak's goal entering '07. I think they're getting there, whether their depth is 7th or 17th really doesn't matter. It's a lot better than it used to be.
     
  15. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Daniels can block ?
     
  16. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    He is not a stud blocker, but I thik he does ok. I am more worried about his fumbles.
     
  17. kiwitexansfan

    kiwitexansfan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    472
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    7th best depth and 20th in the power rankings....

    Smells like a whole lot of mediocrity...
     
  18. Texanmike02

    Texanmike02 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    8,248
    Likes Received:
    747
    Why? He's had 3 bad games.

    Mike
     
  19. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,273
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Hard to hang on the ball with a busted up nose (where one of his fumbles came from). I think his broken nose bothered him more than they let be known publicly.
     
  20. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    keep in mind though that he did hang onto the ball with the nose. it hit the ground, he was out, he cradled the ball. you may be right that after that his play was effected.
     

Share This Page