New big 3 will make old big 3 shine

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by jmerog, Jan 5, 2006.

  1. jmerog

    jmerog Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    13
    You are all throwing around the wrong names. The names that need to be coming out of your mouths (or fingertips) are D'Brickashaw Ferguson, Virginia, Marcus McNeill, Auburn,and Nick Mangold,Ohio state. With Ferguson at LT, McNeil at RT, and Mangold at C,we could make all of our craziest football dreams come true. Allow me to elaborate

    With this offensive line, we can:

    1. Pass the ball to the studly Mr. Johnson, the speedy Mr. Mathis, and the sticky and acrobatic Mr. Armstrong. We do this by protecting Carr and giving him the time he needs to throw the ball down field. He has the arm to do it if given the time. Whatever your opinion of Carr, He has a strong arm. More protection(time,security) would solve most of his problems. Even a mediocre QB could do a fantastic job with enough time and talent surrounding him. Ferguson is an outstanding pass blocker and the best this draft has to offer or has had for years. An upright QB is a GOOD thing.

    2.Run, Run, Run ! Marcus McNeill at RT along with Mangold at C would give DD more running room and possibly more longevity. Mangold and McNeil are both big punishing meanies. With a solid, punishing line , even our #2 and #3 RB's would look like stars. Mangold also has shown great leadership on the line and once he learned the new system (everyone else will be learning a new system too), he would provide cohesion and a mean push up front.
    These three players would be solid anchors to build our new line around and allow the talent on our team to shine and allow new talent to develop.

    3. Have picks left over for defense (and possibly a reciever). Stopping the other team from scoring is :yahoo: a good thing:) We have many needs to address defensively. By getting oline instead of bush or young, we not only inprove the rb and qb we have, we possibly have more picks left over to address these many needs.

    We already some good recivers that could be successful but you can never have too many good recievers. Hopefully the new coaches won't overlook Armstrong and maybe Mathis can be developed, too. Gaffney is servicable.

    Year in and year out, O-line along with outstanding coaching make winners. They make ok players look great, and great players look phenominal
     
  2. jmerog

    jmerog Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    13
    kubiak or another west coast offense coach will seal the deal
     
  3. Coach C.

    Coach C. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    SE Houston
    Although I like mangold and McNeil I am not and may never be sold on Ferguson. If he shows up to the combine at 310 which is 20+lbs and shows some strength then he might turn me around. Everyone knows what LT I like in this draft so no reason to mention it, Mangold is good, but Eslinger is so much better. Eslinger plays with a nasty streak reserved for LBs. Also we can address C in the 3rd so that gives us options after we trade down.
     
  4. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,343
    Likes Received:
    3,048
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    yep, I agree. Football is won and lost in the trenches. But people would rather focus on the position players because it's more exciting.

    Good post, though. Nice to see some analysis around here beyond just Bush and Young.
     
  5. bdiddy

    bdiddy Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    7
    I am NOT a Ferguson fan. He plays way too high and will be VERY susceptible to bull rushes. I think he is athletic (meaning good feet), but lacks enough strength, plays high, and at times appears stiff.
     
  6. Coach C.

    Coach C. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    SE Houston
    Well Bdiddy it seems like you have watched some film on Fergy. Nice to see something other than blind loyalty to D'brick, Bush, or VY, even though you are a homer for VY.
     
  7. jmerog

    jmerog Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    13
    I agree that ferguson is underwight now but he has a frame that should accomodate more and his footwork is superb. At any rate, Substituting your picks for these positions would make me almost as happy as mine because the point remains the same. I like your idea of posibly getting a center late and saving the pick but not if we cant get a great one.He needs to be punishing and smart.
     
  8. TXurias

    TXurias Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2006
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm not sure everyone would rather focus on position players but we do have the #1 pick so that's the hot topic. But I do agree there should be a thread on what players will be available to us in the later rounds. I hope we pick up the best OL or LB available with the 2nd round pick. Does anyone know what picks we gave up for Buchanon?
     


  9. MightyTExan

    MightyTExan It's go time!

    Joined:
    May 3, 2005
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    130
    Add a kickbutt TE and I'm sold.
     
  10. bdiddy

    bdiddy Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    Messages:
    452
    Likes Received:
    7
    Addressing weight issues, I have heard many on this board suggesting Feguson gain weight - however, his sophomore season he weighed 325-335 and lost A LOT of quickness and was told to lose weight. Scouts are not sure he could maintain his current level of play with additional weight.

    Coach C - I know I am a Homer for considering the jump on to the VY bandwagon, but the guy is unique (as is Reggie Bush). Even if he is a Longhorn you have got to give him his due.
     
  11. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    Where I think your analysis is good, I will never agree because the talent isn't here. A great line can do wonders. However, and I know I'm a broken record, these guys can be found in lower rounds and in free agency. If you go back decades and look at the two teams squaring off in the SB, which I'm assuming is where people want to be, EVERY team but maybe a couple had either a franchise QB, RB or both. No exceptions. Armstrong and these secondary receivers will not get it done. IMHO opinion Carr isn't the guy either. You have this one shot to parlay this pick into a special skill guy. There is a reason why this team has lost every year..TALENT. A O-line doesn't make average backs better or healthier. They aren't game breakers. Plain and simple. If you look at Tackles taken in the draft over the years there is no guarantee they will lead their team to the playoffs. Look at the Raiders. Rober gallery was a can't miss guy. He starts and they have Collins, L. Jordan. Moss and some other athletic receivers in Porter and Gabriel and it got them nowhere. Part of that is coachign but still these guys aren't guarentees.
     
  12. jmerog

    jmerog Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    13

    Armstrong is a magnet and catches almost everything near him. He is simply not used enough. and We do have a franchise reciver in Johnson. A good O-line DOES make a decent running back better.the denver broncos of last year are a fine example. Besides DD isnt a slouch.
     
  13. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    I'm so glad that the Broncos keep coming up because their line is made up of a guy that was a 20th pick in the 1st round, a free agent, 2 4th rounders and a 7th rounders. Pretty good production for guys who weren't over the top high draft picks, huh?
     
  14. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    I don't think the answer to our O-line problems is by drafting 3 rookies. I like D'Brickashaw, draft him. Adding 2 other rookies though would be bad, in my opinion. If we can sign a free agent offensive lineman, I would be happy with that.

    On the wide recievers, I don't think Mathis and Armstrong are 2nd and 3rd wide recievers. I think we have to draft another wide reciever or sign a FA WR. Reggie Wayne is a FA, I would like him.
     
  15. Texans86

    Texans86 All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    927
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Waco, Texas
    You said an offensive line doesn't make an average running back better. The Denver Broncos are a good example of how a good line can make a running back look really good. Where the lineman get drafted is irrelevant.
     
  16. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    It ISNT irrelevant!!!That is has been the big argument. Taking a guy with a Top 5 pick. Their line proves that through drafting, free agency and scouting you can find these guys without wasting a Top 5 pick. The Texans have 4 of the first 66 picks and 7 overall more after #1. If Charlie did his job you could have the best of both worlds. The World Champ Patriots have a 2nd rounder, free agents and everyone else is below the 3rd round. DD isn't going to be the breakaway, game winning guy even with the top line. He is injured frequently and had no breakaway bursts. Do teams key on the guy?No, they let him get yards and attack Carr.
     
  17. DRAMA

    DRAMA All Pro

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    524
    Likes Received:
    27
    Location:
    Houston
    ...and lets move Chester Pitts BACK to Guard right? Or wait...let me guess...to Right Tackle?

    DaBrick is not going to be taken in the top 3 and is not rated that much higher than like 7 other tackles. WOW...just don't get the obsession with someone that very few have actually seen play.

    Reggie or Bush - get a playmaker and use the OH MY GOSH!!! the 33rd pick on a lineman or a gerat TE, imo.
     
  18. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,250
    Likes Received:
    1,991
    You're really looking at this in thw wrong light, IMHO. Every offensive line in the NFL is formed from later-round picks. However, most of them have a 1st-round stud tackle to anchor them, taken in the top-20 overall. There are exceptions, sure. And I'd be really happy if the Texans turned out to be a team that stumbled across their franchise LT in later rounds. But the odds aren't in favor of that happening. That doesn't mean it cannot happen, but it's not as likely as if we take a stud tackle in the 1st round.

    Tom Brady was taken in the 6th round with a compensatory pick. Using your logic, teams shouldn't bother spending top picks on QBs, right? The majority of the league (at least 20 teams) currently have a tackle starting for them that was taken in the top 20 overall. I've posted the list before, so just check my post history if you want to see it, or look at the depth charts for each team and cross reference it on drafthistory.com. Again, I am not discounting what you say, but I am saying that you're touting thr exception, rather than the rule. If the Texans find themselves lucky enough to be in that camp, sign me up. Otherwise, I'd rather see us take a top tackle and build the line from there. I don't think many are saying spend a first round pick on a center or guard.
     
  19. Texans Horror

    Texans Horror Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,303
    Likes Received:
    134
    Dave Thomas has looked real good all season - tough and can catch - but I don't think we'll have a shot at him.
     
  20. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,328
    Likes Received:
    628
    I think you are missing the big picture - if we start 3 rookies on the line we can get the first pick again next year!:)
     

Share This Page