NE just a bad matchup?

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by GRONKED, Jan 16, 2013.

  1. GRONKED

    GRONKED Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    11
    Great game guys.

    Easy on the doom n gloom..you have a great team that has been making huge strides...I expect you in the afc elite for years to come as long as andrew luck doesn't start owning the division.

    Question..do you think the pats could just be an awful matchup?

    Ie, the ravens could never do anything about Peytons colts. Even when they were similar quality and similar record teams..Peyton blew them out and made them look bad, consistently.

    Likewise..those colts regularly choked vs chargers.

    Just looking at some of the matchups..you love to run the ball up the middle and really establish your offense around foster. Well foster, meet wilfork.

    On d...jj watt is phenomenal, one of a kind. But brady was gettin it out ridiculously fast most of the time.

    Jjo, an exceptional talent. .is on the outside covering. ...Lloyd?

    Your injured lb core is Bradys favorite to pick on (wes, Hernandez and rb mismatch).
    You guys blew out the ravens. ..and, ray Lewis or not, imo you woulda beat them again if you had advanced.

    Fyi, not suggesting that Texans aren't flawed or that there isn't opportunity to improve. Just that youre a lot better than you look in Foxboro.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. JCTexan

    JCTexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    5,008
    Likes Received:
    229
    Location:
    Austin
    Yes, I think it's a bad match-up for the Texans. Houston plays a man-coverage style defense. Elite QB's who can fit the ball into tight coverage can destroy it. Tom Brady is an elite QB that has eaten this defense up.

    Now I don't quite understand why Schaub hasn't been effective against the Patriots defense but for whatever reason, he hasn't. For the most part the Texans offense hasn't been as effective since the first game in Foxboro, though. It could actually have nothing to do with the match-up, but it could just be the Texans offense in general.
     
  3. ajohnson80

    ajohnson80 Veteran

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Houston
    not sure about bad matchup they are just a better team..I have them beating the Ravens then losing to the 49ers in the sb..super jealous of your qb/coach.
     
  4. GRONKED

    GRONKED Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    11
    I think I woulda rather lost in the first round. Nothing stings more than a sb loss (especially when it always comes down to some 4th q comeback.) Not sure i can argue tho..SF is just scary on both sides of the ball
     
  5. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    56,566
    Likes Received:
    3,015
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I don't know. I think you guys have the speed on the edges to control Kap if discipline is maintained. I guess Gronk is out and that is a blow but Hernandez and Welker can still hit the underneath crossing stuff for YAC. The Niners pull their best LB a lot. Gore likes to run right into Wilfork territory moreso than bounce outside (which I have no idea why we didn't run more of our wide zone stretch play). I expect you will beat the Ravens and we'll find out.

    By the way (now that you are being much more civil) check out the Dynasty thread in the NFL forum. You will find your team gets plenty of respect.
     
  6. Wolf6151

    Wolf6151 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,614
    Likes Received:
    132
    Location:
    Pearland, Texas
    Yes we are a bad matchup with Brady, your O-line is excellent in pass protection and one of the best QB's ever cuts us up like a turkey at Thanksgiving. N.E. should beat the Ravens handily but I think S.F. will win the Super Bowl. Best of luck to you Gronked....
     
  7. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,526
    Likes Received:
    602
    i've been saying since preseason - we dont match up with the packers or patriots. the packers have a much higher chance of not showing up to full potential, and would give us a fair shot at stealing some games, but that's something we rarely see from the patriots. i'd expect us to lose 4 out of 5 against the patriots until we significantly improve our coverage from the linebacker position.

    playcalling and discipline hasnt done us any favors this season against yall, so i think we should've kept both games much closer, but as you suggested we simply dont match up well at all against the patriots. you have the biggest hurdle for our offense - a wall at nose. our run plays are destroyed when the guards are pushed backwards at the snap and it dominoes from there. on defense, as i said it's about the linebackers. without cushing we have zero coverage ability and actually have to lean on our OLB's to drop or play man to man while the ILB's are running around lost.
     
  8. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,365
    Likes Received:
    1,896
    Location:
    Texas
    I definitely think NE is a big match up problem for us. Mainly because your play makers seem to play with more urgency, i.e. they know when they need to step up & they do it.

    We've got a guy crossing the goal line with the football at eye level, but somehow it goes right through his fingers.

    Offensively & defensively, we've got guys on this team that we believe match up with the great players all over this league, but when the bright lights are on, they show the world a totally different guy.

    From QB to waterboy. We've got maybe three guys who get it. When playing the Patriots & their 11 to 15 guys who get it, we're out gunned.

    Going against a Baltimore, or a Denver, we're on even ground. Our best 3 or 4 against their best 3 or 4.

    But when your third string running back understands he's got to make a play & makes that play.... we can't compete with that.
     


  9. deucetx

    deucetx All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2012
    Messages:
    594
    Likes Received:
    75
    QFT. Really hit the nail on the head. I think it even spreads to coaching. We can say what we want about Belichek but the guy adapts and adjusts in pre-planning and during the game. Sometimes when watching the defense not line up in time or cover someone...at all...I had to say to my son 'It's like they didn't even watch any game film or prepare at all.' Not to mention our verrrryyyy slow no-huddle offense.

    It's one thing to get beat man on man. It's another to come and seem un-prepared and get beat on the mental aspect.
     
    thunderkyss likes this.
  10. Tailgate

    Tailgate Fall of Hame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,178
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Houston, TX - Born and raised
    YES. A bad matchup for us.... especially without Cushing, and multiplied when in your house.

    Our strengths match up with your strengths.... i.e. Watt vs your O-line and Bradys quick decision making/release. And our running game vs your run D (Vince Wilfork). Compounded by the fact that our offense is predicated off the running game, and the fact that we play far better with a lead.

    Conversley your strengths matchup vs our weaknesses. Your passing game vs. wide open middle of the D (ILBs shredded).... and your passing game vs. our man coverage defense which is exposed when we cannot get to the QB. Our sacks were down this year without legit ILBs to confuse blitz packages and coverages.

    Good luck vs. the Ravens. You wont need it. But as it has been said... the 49ers may be a bad matchup for you.
     
  11. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,499
    Likes Received:
    3,168
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    For years the Texans FO tried to build a team that could beat the Manning-led Colts.

    It looks like they have to set their sights higher now and try to build a team that can compete with the Patriots.

    It seems every team in this league, including the Pats, has a team that gives them trouble. I heard a stat this morning about Brady in the playoffs. In his 6 losses, four of them had QB rating around 60. Two of those four games were against the Ravens. And looking at last year's AFC championship game, the Ravens should have won it if they could just execute simple things like catching an easy pass in the endzone.
     
    thunderkyss likes this.
  12. GRONKED

    GRONKED Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2012
    Messages:
    36
    Likes Received:
    11
    Hmm usually when I think bad matchup I think giants for obvious reasons.

    Brady has 2 playoff losses vs ravens? I thought just one, the week after wes got injured. But yeah, they always play us tough.
     
  13. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,499
    Likes Received:
    3,168
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    Good point on Giants. Coughlin just seems to have Belichick's number in Super Bowl matchups.

    I heard the stat about the Ravens on that NFL Network morning show, but I did not verify the information. Not the first time they would be wrong, so take it fwiw.
     
  14. MEGA SWATT

    MEGA SWATT Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    93
    Location:
    H-Town
    Yes. However, my concern is also how we match up with GB, SF, NYG, etc. or how will you win a SB if you get there?

    If we do learn how to beat NE (like we learned to beat the ravens), we still need to smack down Denver, Luck/Colts and remain strong against the raves.
     
  15. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,365
    Likes Received:
    1,896
    Location:
    Texas
    I agree completely. I put this game as well as last year's divisional loss squarely on the coaches. I think Matt Schaub has a better game in him, but we didn't set things up in his favor. I know Arian has a better game in him, but we didn't set it up in his favor. I know Jj Watt, Kareem Jackson & Jjo have better games in them, but we did not set them up to succeed.

    No doubt in my mind, that those coaches are smarter men than me. & if I could see opportunities we could have exploited, I don't understand why they didn't.
     
  16. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,365
    Likes Received:
    1,896
    Location:
    Texas
    This makes a lot of sense. Hopefully we'll be the top seed in the AFC South for years to come & we'll be playing the Patriots, Ravens, & Denvers every year.
     
  17. IDEXAN

    IDEXAN Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    9,059
    Likes Received:
    240
    Location:
    Houston
    Anytime a team goes up against Tom Brady it's a bad matchup for them.
     
  18. Luv_ya_blue

    Luv_ya_blue 1%er

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2006
    Messages:
    4,231
    Likes Received:
    264
    Location:
    Beaumont, TX
    Elite NFL teams can overcome bad matchups through exceptional coaching/preparation and top notch execution.

    Does anyone believe that the Ravens really are better than the Broncos due to a fluke 70 yd pass where a safety makes a bad read and takes a terrible angle to get to Jacoby freakin' Jones??? But in that one split second it was a matter of terrible execution; and the result was--a Ravens win. Why not take a chance with :40 on the clock and Manning at the helm? What led us to a 43-13 win against the Ravens in week 7? Are we clearly that much better than the Ravens? I don't think we are.

    I simply think that the preparation (Belicheck) that meets execution (Brady) is far better than most other teams across the league.

    Until our game planning is ramped up a notch and our execution is able to overcome the simplest of mistakes--we are and will remain a squad with "potential."

    My problem is, I see way too much talent on this team to execute as poorly as we do. We did very well through the first part of the season. What changed? Cushing was hurt. And? Was he that pivotal to our defense--and if so, why? Clearly there wasn't someone groomed to take over the leadership role in his absence, and our defense suffered immensly as a result. Why is this the case? That's a poor coaching imo. We were all so excited about Wade coming to town that we were oblivious to the possibility that he had his own limitations. But we can see them now.

    Where do we go now?
     
  19. ThaShark316

    ThaShark316 #28

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    2,410
    Likes Received:
    196
    Location:
    Rosharon, TX
    Who remembers the 90s Rockets? Who was the one team our Rockets couldn't beat?

    Sonics.

    That's what this is right now. Rockets = Texans, Pats = SuperSonics.

    Wilfork is Kemp and Brady is Gary Payton, etc. So GRONKED is right with his thread title.
     
  20. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,620
    Likes Received:
    656
    Location:
    Over here.
    I don't disagree, but the Pats are overall better than that Sonics team was. Some of it is matchup and some of it is just that Brady is that good.
     

Share This Page