More clutch? Matt Schaub vs Tony Romo

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by TheRealJoker, Oct 10, 2011.

  1. TheRealJoker

    TheRealJoker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    274
    Location:
    Conroe
    Who would you rather have leading your team's final drive down by 5 with 2:00 left to play?
     
  2. ziggy29

    ziggy29 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Nordheim, TX
    Probably Schaub, but "more clutch than Tony Romo" is like saying "better WR than Jacoby Jones" or "a better corner than Kareem Jackson."
     
  3. Texecutioner

    Texecutioner Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Messages:
    14,381
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Those are extreme comparisons that don't fit at all and you know it.


    Romo and Schaub are both QB's that can be clutch at times. The problem is when their teams expect them to be clutch the majority of the time to win games for their teams. They aren't the types of QB's that you can expect that much from on a consistent basis. You've got to have the other units of your team carrying their load a lot better than what the Texans and the Cowboys both have. People need to stop blaming Schaub for every loss just like the delusional media anchors who highlight Romo for every Cowboys loss when Jason Garrett is this pass happy coach that has no idea on how to seal a game with a ball control offense and has Romo airing it out like they're down by 20 in the 4th. Romo and Schaub are what they are. They're good QB's, but they will never be the type of QB that will carry a team to a SB. Very few QB's are though that list consists of about 5 or 6 guys out of 32 teams, so having a guy like Romo or Schaub isn't bad at all.
     
  4. ziggy29

    ziggy29 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,739
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Nordheim, TX
    Yeah, it was an intended exaggeration -- but I do think that even though they put in some "clutch" performances, there is a knack (especially with Romo) for being ridiculously unclutch at the most critical moment which negates the more "clutch" moments.

    I'm just looking back to Schaub's last drive. Some could say that it was "clutch" for him to drive the team 60 yards in less than two minutes, especially considering a sack, a facemask and a bad snap. And before the last play, it was. But *one* really, really unclutch performance in the "play of the game" pretty much undoes all the "clutch" that preceded it.
     
  5. The1ApplePie

    The1ApplePie Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    10,183
    Likes Received:
    566
    I'd put money on Romo actually. Of course he could make a horrible bone-headed mistake but I would put more faith in him driving down the field.

    Need a FG to win, I'd take Schaub
    If I need a TD, I go Romo.
     
  6. TEXANRED

    TEXANRED Texan-American

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,919
    Likes Received:
    694
    That's like asking me if I would rather get punched in the left nut or right nut.
     
  7. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,478
    Likes Received:
    3,150
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    Trent Dilfer! :ohsnap:
     
  8. hobie

    hobie Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,242
    Likes Received:
    282
    Yeah, and he has a ring !!
     


  9. Honoring Earl 34

    Honoring Earl 34 Hey Koolaid

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    19,802
    Likes Received:
    1,342
    Location:
    Houston
    To lose my pcness for a second ,

    This is like the tallest midget contest . :tiptoe:
     
  10. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,358
    Likes Received:
    2,071

Share This Page