LZ Speaks!

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Jackie Chiles, Apr 26, 2010.

  1. Jackie Chiles

    Jackie Chiles Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    130
    Location:
    Houston
  2. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,002
    Likes Received:
    550
    really accurate. yes I was one of those who kept plugging him about Tate, in which he always replied "nothing special".

    right on down the line I can agree. Dickerson is the closest thing to a steal for the Texans while Sharpton had more value because it was a weak inside LB draft.
     
  3. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,704
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    Zerline and I have same concerns about Jackson, but here's hoping we are wrong. I don't the Kareem will be a bust but remains to be seen if he can stick with WR down the field. I think good passings QBs will test him early and often.
     
  4. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    353
    Location:
    Austin
    For what its worth: had it been Kyle Wilson or McCourty they would've been tested early and often as well too.

    Hopefully, Wilson will be healthy enough to at least start the season and we can have some sort of help over the top at FS. I'm not counting on him staying healthy though.
     
  5. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,940
    Likes Received:
    449
    I think this is dead on, although I like the Jackson and Tate picks. The Dickerson observation is cool and if he doesn't work out....he's a 7th rounder. Exactly what would've been the case if we took a QB at that spot.
     
  6. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,250
    Likes Received:
    1,858
    Location:
    Texas
    I'm commenting now.
    I hate it when people say this. It shows they have absolutely no clue what the purpose of the draft grade is. If it doesn't matter, why do we care so much who we get? Why don't we just roll the dice, throw a dart, or let the commish decide who we get.

    We don't do any of that crap, because it matters. We're not "grading" the players so much, as we are grading the teams, and how well they addressed their teams future with the information and situation they had on draft day.
     
    WolverineFan likes this.
  7. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,002
    Likes Received:
    550
    interesting specificly to me is I wanted Rusty Smith in the 7th (went 6th rd. to Tennessee) then a WR in 5th. along with Blair White, Dickerson @ WR was rated in this range while the QB class just wasn't as deep. so you don't force positions of need just because that's what you need at the moment you take the bpa on your big board. I realize the WR position is an area of strength, but it won't stay an area of strength unless you steadily work to improve your talent, Dickerson accomplishes that.

    I saw the Texans picked up QB Tyler Sheehan, Bowling Green as undrafted free agent. He is 6030 225 very productive four year starter with passer rating of 137.13 & threw over 4,000 yds. I can live with that lets see if he can make the PS & develop into a decent back-up.
     
    Ole Miss Texan likes this.
  8. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    685
    Couldn't agree more. You don't fill needs with late round prospects. Typically, later round guys take longer to develop than the guys taken earlier. Gotta take the best players available because in the long run you've got your team full of better talent vs. passing on the higher talent, filling needs with late round guys and the overall talent on your team diminishes. We're thinking long term development (L/T is a relative term, in the NFL it could be 2-3 years).

    I for one would much rather grab a guy in the 6th round for example that you had rated as a 4th rounder, than reach on a position of need like FS. For one you're getting a worse player and two it's unlikely that player can beat out your current starter so your not using him anyways.
     


  9. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,704
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    I agree Sheehan is an interesting pick up but I know absolutely nothing about Bowling Green or it's offense/schedule.
     
  10. El Tejano

    El Tejano Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    9,940
    Likes Received:
    449
    That dude can play. He looks a little led foot though sometimes.
     
  11. dc_txtech

    dc_txtech Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Round Rock
    Round 2 — Ben Tate, RB, Auburn
    Z-Report Top 100: 89
    Z-Report Says: Obviously, I wasn't quite as high on Ben Tate as the Texans were, but most of you who read this blog know that. However, I wasn't in love with Toby Gerhardt for this system either so trading back to the end of the second round, picking up an extra pick and getting one of the RBs who actually does fit this system was a solid move for Rick Smith and the Texans. I don't think Tate always plays to his timed speed and I also don't think we see that blazing speed until he's in the open field. I think he needs to learn to play to his speed, but that can be coached. I contacted a scout who has to evaluate RBs for his team and he said about Tate, "He's not a physical runner that breaks tackles consistently. Could be a great pick as I love productive SEC runners."

    Is this a typo?
     
  12. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,000
    Likes Received:
    448
    I dont think so. That is what I see in him, and I got grilled for it. But hey, the FO got who they wanted. Lets see if they made the right choice.
     
  13. dc_txtech

    dc_txtech Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Round Rock
    So he isn't physical, doesn't break tackles, and doesn't have elite speed? I haven't watched a lot of the guy but I sure hope LZ is wrong on this one.
     
  14. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,704
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    I think Tate's value will be quick burst through a hole like Slaton but maybe a tad harder to bring down. I will be interested if they have Slaton on field same time as Tate.
     
  15. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,000
    Likes Received:
    448
    Eh. He has speed, but does not play to it. He has the size, and will break some tackles, but he does not do it on a consistent basis. To many times I saw him good stuffed by one guy.

    Also, whoever is thinking of posting a highlight video of Tate, please don't. They are called highlight videos for a reason.
     
  16. badboy

    badboy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    25,704
    Likes Received:
    1,018
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    ^Snicker^
     
  17. dc_txtech

    dc_txtech Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Round Rock
    Yeah, I know he ran a solid 40 time. I was just referring to the LZ article.
     
  18. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,696
    Likes Received:
    685
    Tate is ideal for the ZBS, the one-cut and go type of runner. He's got a quick burst and can accelerate quickly. Most see his size (220lbs) and assume he's a bowling ball type that barrels through people but he really doesn't run with that style.

    He reminds me a lot of a bigger Steve Slaton. Both are a good fit for this offense. They're able to cut upfield, accelerate through the hole, they'll keep their legs moving, they're quick but not overly fast (they'll get caught from behind). They're not going to consistently run people over and break all sorts of tackles but I like their chances when hitting DB's head on. Again, this is the type of RB our system wants.
     
  19. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    Its actually funny because Slaton has turned into quite the tackle breaker. That ws actually his biggest problem, because as he fought for those extra 2 yards, people would strip the ball away
     
  20. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    56,324
    Likes Received:
    2,952
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Yes he has.

    I think the scout's opinion fails in having an unstated condition - for a guy as big as he is he doesn't consistently break tackles as much as you would expect. People look at a Steve Slaton and don't expect him to break tackles so when he does it is looked at as a bonus vs. for a guy like Tate anything short of Earl Campbell is a disappointment. Oh and highlight video, yada, yada, but he broke 8 tackles on just one run.
     

Share This Page