Leonard Davis best FA available OL?!

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by Imatexanfan, Jan 11, 2007.

  1. Imatexanfan

    Imatexanfan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Ft.Knox, KY
    Since our season is over and it looks like we have already started the what if post of the offseason. I'll run this up the flag pole and see if anybody salutes it. :yahoo:

    We need a better O-line. We drafted 2 in the 3rd round last year. Now most football people say that it takes a year or two for an O-lineman to get ready for the NFL. The 2007 season will be year two for Winston and Spencer. IF we draft another one high in the draft we will have no guarantee that he will catch on quick enough to start. We are not sure if Spencer will be back. Can we really afford to take a chance on another rookie and hope everybody else steps up?! My answer is NO. :shades:

    How about we sign Leonard Davis. He has only missed 5 games in 6 years. He is still young at 28. He is massive at 6-6 and 366lbs. He went to UT so that MAJOR requirement is taken care of. He makes good money so that could be a problem, but IF we could add him to our line that might be a real bonus. :ok:

    Look guys, Davis is a massive tackle that the Cardinals can’t afford to lose to free agency, but it seems likely that they will.

    The Arizona offensive line is already suspect, and losing Davis would be a huge step in the wrong direction, but the team may have to let him go and find a replacement. Davis has shown the ability to simply be a wall of protection for his quarterback and while teams might not line up for the chance to sign him, anyone looking for a tackle will have him high on the list.

    And WE, as of WE I mean the Texans of course, should be the first one there, IMO.:yes:
     
  2. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    I don't care who we sign in FA to upgrade our O-line, as long as we sign someone who is

    A) Young
    B) Abover-average to good

    Which would automatically make him an upgrade over anyone we've had on the line before.
     
  3. hadaad

    hadaad All Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    870
    Likes Received:
    45
    I believe that even if the Cardinals lose Leonard Davis to FA, and even if he does lower his salary demands and all of that, I do not see him coming to the Texans. His size leads to the perception (correct or not) that he does not move as well as the smaller linemen that the Zone Blocking System is geared toward. I think, if anything, he will stay put. Either that or go to the Raiders.
     
  4. Caesar

    Caesar Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    1
    He played for UT. Unfortunately, it ain't gonna happen.
     
  5. Bubbajwp

    Bubbajwp All Flopper

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    In the Warehouse
    Leonard Davis is a snail. He would be terrible in our zone blocking scheme. The Bronco's Oline averages at about 305 to 310 pounds.

    Yes I know Spencer is huge to 350 or whatever. But he is very athletic Davis is not.
     
  6. Imatexanfan

    Imatexanfan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Messages:
    918
    Likes Received:
    47
    Location:
    Ft.Knox, KY
    New GM though hell he'd probably go for Kolb if available in the later draft.
     
  7. Bubbajwp

    Bubbajwp All Flopper

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    In the Warehouse
    Espn's scouting report on Davis. Or atleast the important part of it.

     
  8. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    I don't he is the kind of tackle we need with our ZBS
     


  9. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    54,112
    Likes Received:
    2,480
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Pitts would be a better LT than Davis, particularly in our system. The only reason the Cardinals might not resign him is he ain't that good--11 penalties and 8 sacks given up last year from the QB's non-blind side. The grass is not always greener.
     
  10. Insideop

    Insideop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    94
    Location:
    In the "Control Room"
    That's what I heard too! And he's coming from an O-line as bad or worse than the Texans! Remember, they took Milfred Brown from us last year in FA as an upgrade to their guard position.

    I've heard Davis is the best LT in FA this year, so that's kind of an indication there ain't much there, at that position, in FA. It's like I've said before in other threads, teams don't let their good LT's get away in FA because they know how valuable they are. So, if you see a LT out there in FA, you gotta ask yourself, what's wrong with this guy that his team isn't trying to resign him? I'll say no thank you to getting Davis. JMHO!
     
  11. mexican_texan

    mexican_texan Furry Tractors

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    14,192
    Likes Received:
    515
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Max Starks.
     
  12. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,475
    Likes Received:
    2,300
    If the best you can find in FA offensive linemen is Leonard Davis then that's "the gods" telling you that you should probably just re-sign your own people and then try to improve through the draft.

    If you think reaching in the draft is bad try comparing it to reaching in free agency. It's ten times worse because on top of probably failing to get what you need you also overpay for the privilege.

    Pass on this guy and don't look back.
     
  13. threetoedpete

    threetoedpete Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Katy, Texas
  14. phan1

    phan1 All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    650
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ummm... I don't know much about the guy, but I do know the Cardinals Oline SUCKS. And they're going to let him go if he's that good? Sorry, but I'm not buying him.
     
  15. MorKnolle

    MorKnolle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    127
    Leonard Davis is a pretty solid mauling OG, not sure why they moved him to LT other than it was a desperate attempt to find someone that could provide some pass protection for their QB and he was their most talented lineman. That said, he isn't a good fit for our system, otherwise I'd look at him. I personally think the Cards should move him back to OG and have a nice big duo with him and Deuce Lutui on their interior line, after they get a real LT (Joe Thomas is a lock for them if he ends up falling to #5) their line should be pretty solid in run blocking. However if the rumors are true that Mike Sherman is headed there, he will likely install some semblance of a zone blocking scheme on offense which could seal Davis' fate there.
     
  16. SLO Texan

    SLO Texan Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    S.L.O, California
    waht do you guys think about signing that Steinbach guy( I think he's a guard) and moving Pitts back to LT ..IF...Spencer doesnt come back 100%?

    I've heard people saying lots of good things about him and IF Spencer comes back healthy enough that could be a pretty good line imo!!!

    LT-Spencer...LG-Pitts...C-McKinney...RG-Steinbach...RT-Winston

    Thoughts?
     
  17. MorKnolle

    MorKnolle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    127
    I don't think they have any intention of moving Pitts back to LT, but I think Steinbach would be a pretty good fit for us. I'd also prefer to see Weary at C as opposed to McKinney. Being able to relocate veterans like McKinney, Flanagan, and Weigert to the bench where they can provide solid playing time in an emergency and provide good leadership to the younger guys but keep them off the field and hopefully stay healthy can only make this line better. I wouldn't mind seeing them bring in a more capable backup OT somewhere in there too so we're not forced to play Ephraim Salaam if someone gets hurt, but a late round pick (maybe Brandon Frye from Virginia Tech, although I haven't looked into OT prospects much yet) or a free agent would be nice.
     
  18. Toro

    Toro Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    9
    Davis's biggest problems are more mental than phsyical.

    First off, he is very complacent. Instead of working hard to get better and to improve his weaknesses, he instead relies on his strengths and thinks those will be enough. I'd call him lazy, but that seems too harsh. Instead, I'll use the "lacks motivation" card.

    Also, when he makes mistakes, instead of brushing them off, he seems to let it dictate the pace of how he plays for the remainder of the game.

    I think it's fitting that the Cardinals, who have probably one of the weakest offensive lines in the NFL, have made no concentrated efforts to even begin negotiations with him.

    If I had to pick an OT, I'd take Max Starks over Davis.. That's just me though.
     
  19. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,326
    Likes Received:
    549
    leanord davis would be the left tackle equivelent of todd wade and might not even be better than salaam ... along with costing a LOT more than he's worth. if spencer doesnt come back, i'd feel more comfortable with pitts or winston starting at LT than i would with davis. from the few times i've seen him and his reported performance, davis has no legs and is a serious underachiever (and by his weight and what i've read he's lazy & unmotivated). we need to upgrade the offensive line, not throw way too much money at someone who likely wont be better than what we already have. if this is our best option through FA at the tackle position, lets just focus more effort on drafting tackles (which would be ideal anyways).

    i dont watch many bengals games so i cant comment directly on steinbach, but i've heard and read nothing but good things about him. he's very versatile and would probably be an upgrade at both guard positions, center, and LT (if spencer doesnt come back). i dont like the shuffling that this signing would cause, but IMO it'd be worth it if we could get a young and talented player solidifying our weakest area on offense. he'd be a building block for our offense and deffinately someone we should persue at (almost) all costs.

    when did max starks become available? i doubt that he'd be a good fit here because he's not the most mobile of right tackles, but he's someone i'd put some research into.
     
  20. Coach C.

    Coach C. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,422
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    SE Houston
    Like were you are going with this. I would like to add that if Steinbach is not an option Kris Deilman from the Chargers is. Now I doubt the Chargers or Bengals dont pursue these two very good guards, but if we could bring one of them in it would do alot for the line. I prefer Dielman since he is more accustomed to ZBS, plus he is a RG. I am definately hoping for one impact player on both sides of the ball in FA.
     

Share This Page