League will consider abolishing all blocks below the waist in 2013

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by sometexansfan, Nov 23, 2012.

  1. sometexansfan

    sometexansfan Blue Bomber

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    17
  2. Stemp

    Stemp Brew Master

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    7,150
    Likes Received:
    495
    Location:
    Temple, TX
    So if a Player falls and the defender "trips" over him it will be a penalty?
    I see many teams taking advantage
     
  3. TEXANRED

    TEXANRED Texan-American

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2005
    Messages:
    7,918
    Likes Received:
    694
    What's next? Defense only gets to field 7 players? Maybe the NFL gives teams a set number of blitz's they can use per game?
     
  4. Say Watt

    Say Watt Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2006
    Messages:
    7,042
    Likes Received:
    161
    Oh geez... I swear these guys are destroying the game of football. It seems the powers that be don't seem to understand making changes without going to the complete opposite extreme.
     
  5. fiasco west

    fiasco west Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    2,119
    Likes Received:
    107
    This helps defenses....

    but I wish they would just leave the game alone. It's a great game.

    You don't see Baseball suddenly saying "No more bunts." or basketball going "You can now dribble with both hands."

    Just leave it alone. Those blocks have been in the game forever, let it be.
     
  6. steelbtexan

    steelbtexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    Messages:
    14,177
    Likes Received:
    569
    God'ell strikes again.

    I may be watching alot more college football.
     
  7. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,684
    Likes Received:
    2,708
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    This is to help defenses.

    I will believe when the rule is passed and this is the reason:

    The other reason is the fact is while defensive players hate cut blocks and like to complain about them they result in injuries only very infrequently.
     
  8. Corrosion

    Corrosion Idealist

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    33,275
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    Location:
    Northwest Houston
    I think this would be in an effort by the league to create .... more scoring by means of more passing. Sneaky bastards ....
     


  9. Playoffs

    Playoffs Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    20,361
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Along with more revealing uniforms in 2013 to increase the female audience,

    This is where we're heading...

    [​IMG]
     
  10. JimBaker488

    JimBaker488 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    187
    Likes Received:
    4
    I dunno, what's that got to do with concussions ?
     
  11. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    That would be a pretty significant change. Not only for the texans on their backside zone plays, but also for quick passes when o linemen are just trying to get the d linemen to get their hands down.

    Also, smaller running backs won't be able cut bigger defenders when pass blocking.

    Not a fan of that proposed change...

    I understand taking out the dirty stuff, but football is violent. Players are going to get hurt. Even with the current rules guys still get hurt a bunch.

    Just make it seven on seven and put flags on. For real. Up and down action, fewer injuries.
     
  12. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    Maybe that little Sam girl will be able to play in the NFL one day after all.
     
  13. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,354
    Likes Received:
    839
    Location:
    Maryland
    2 hand touch coming in 2014.
     
  14. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,684
    Likes Received:
    2,708
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    PFT has revised the story. The paragraph which said cut blocks were going to be eliminated now says:

    That would not affect pass protection or ZBS.
     
  15. Playoffs

    Playoffs Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    20,361
    Likes Received:
    1,276
    Series of tweets, to be read bottom to top.

    Peter King ‏@SI_PeterKing
     
  16. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,684
    Likes Received:
    2,708
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I don't remember the Berry play but this rule change is irrelevant to Cushing. The block on him was already illegal.
     
  17. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,629
    Likes Received:
    2,398
    They'll consider it but they won't go through with it. Instead they'll call for stricter enforcement of the chop block rules and maybe up the penalty. Maybe they'll come up with some tweak that will only allow cut blocks in front of the play or something. They're not going to get rid of it though.

    Think of the effect it would have on the running game. Not just the running game for teams like ours who use the zone scheme exclusively but all those teams who do a little bit of it to throw a wrinkle in. I bet you that making cut blocks entirely illegal would hurt the running game of at least half the teams in the NFL. There just aren't enough quality road-grader linemen out there which is really what the zone blocking scheme is all about. Taking a different kind of lineman that most teams might not want and putting him in a system that plays to his strengths. Much like the 3-4 defense takes those tweaners and makes use of them.

    When the running game goes to hell in a hand basket the pass rushers will pin their ears back and start destroying QB's. Running backs won't even be able to cut them in pass protection. We're back to square one and they start trying to protect the QB's again.

    At some point it stops being football entirely and just turns into some sort of "basketball on 100 yards of grass".

    No, they'll pay some lip service to it and then stop short of changing it. That's my prediction.
     
    Double Barrel likes this.
  18. Corrosion

    Corrosion Idealist

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    33,275
    Likes Received:
    1,418
    Location:
    Northwest Houston
    That I believe is what the league office wants .... more scoring . They have said as much on numerous occasions over the years. This is a means to that end .... Look at the defenseless reciever rules and other changes made in favor of offensive players in recent years.

    If todays refs were to officiate a game played 20 years ago , they'd call pass interference on every play. Those rule changes werent made for player safety either (outside the defenseless reciever rule but it had the same effect) they were made to make the game more exciting and increase scoring.

    Defenses were able to adjust over the years and catch back up to offenses .... but the removal of the cut block or any block below the waist would be a game changer , making RB's less valuable than fullbacks ....

    We'd probably see 32 NFL teams go to some version of the chuck and duck.

    Buddy Ryan would probably .... :gun:
     
  19. Yankee_In_TX

    Yankee_In_TX Dance Lindsay!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    12,448
    Likes Received:
    444
    Location:
    Houston, 77008
  20. ChampionTexan

    ChampionTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,528
    Likes Received:
    713

Share This Page