Kub will Prove the Denver Texans Right

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by CloakNNNdagger, Aug 6, 2006.

  1. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,580
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    .............in their approach to which positions they prioritize. They obviously have already clearly stated that an expensive, potentially very productive runner in the form of Reggie Bush, is like putting a huge, expensive diamond (long term big time cap monies) in a cheap, thin and weak setting (expected longevity). The diamond will be lost when the cheap setting gives way............and that WILL BE sooner than later.

    This article from the Denver Post does a great job of shedding light on the system and the approach to RB that Kub has brought with him to the Texans. It may be a view that Kub and team has taken heat for in recent months, but one that has been felt by and have "subconciously" guided many other teams without them realizing it.

    Even though, the system which Kub brings us is driven by run 1st, pass 2 nd..........it's the receivers that seem to be more the "bring home the bacon" players. Of course, the OL support still needs to be strong. But even the D in this system, as demonstrated by the preferential pick overshadows the importance of obtaining a "superlative" RB.

    As pertains to running backs, as far as Kub and system are concerned the Texans will be investing for "today," because, as we have all found out before, "tommorrow" may never "come."
     
  2. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,014
    Likes Received:
    552
    one could only imagine now what the possiblilties would have been with Bush in Kubiak's system :rolleyes:
     
  3. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,689
    Likes Received:
    1,113
    Yeah, some flashy player to come in on 3rd downs and return punts. ;)
     
  4. MorKnolle

    MorKnolle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    127
    Probably about the same as Clinton Portis' as soon as our OLine is that good. That would be nice to have, but not anywhere near a necessity considering what "lesser" backs have been able to accomplish for them. I don't regret the pick at all and I'm sure the team doesn't either, despite what much of the media is making it out to be.
     
  5. WildBlackBear32

    WildBlackBear32 All Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Maine
    Probably pretty average since the system isn't designed for Shake and Bake runners.
     
  6. tulexan

    tulexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,080
    Likes Received:
    106
    This article basically shows how stupid the Bush pick was for New Orleans. Not only do they have one expensive player at the riskiest position for injuries, but they have two.

    I would have liked to of had Bush on our team, but in the long run Mario was the better pick. The system is more important than the back and we have a lot of young talented players. If one of them doesn't step up this season then we will look for one in free agency or the draft next season. But I think one will step up. I'm not sure which one, but one of them will.
     
  7. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    It's well know that Kubiak was very interested and reportedly prepared to move up into the latter part of the first round and exchange multiple picks to
    have the opportunity to draft D. Williams or L. Maroney, but was out maneuvered by another team for the first round pick he coveted. So this tends to blunt the point of this story that Denver, or a student of "The Denver System", won't pay big value for a running back. But to support the story point, Kubiak did pass on the back of the decade for a non-QB at
    another position.
    What really intrigues me is the thought of Kubiak maybe prefering one of the other two backs over Bush for his version of "The Denver System" here in
    Houston ?
     
  8. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,580
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    The most likely reason is that neither of them are "shake and bake" runners...........just find the hole and straight line it.:

    D. Wiliams profile sounds duplicate to DD


    L. Maroney
     


  9. WildBlackBear32

    WildBlackBear32 All Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    967
    Likes Received:
    12
    Location:
    Maine
    To me, Maroney would have been the perfect fit for the system. He plays a lot like Shaun Alexander.
     
  10. TwinSisters

    TwinSisters Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,470
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    In my mind.
    Just a couple of things that this article is missing:

    The Broncos picked up Troy Calhoun and Jake Plummer in 2003. It's pretty safe to say these two additions played a part in letting Portis go.
    ----

    The Seahawks and Holmgren had to use Alexander because Hasselbeck wasn't getting it done ( specifically problems in the Red zone, WR's dropping balls, and the attitude problems.. along with a whole host of other 'problems' ). His situation in Seattle is entirely different then what is/was going on in Denver.
     
  11. TexanBacker93

    TexanBacker93 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    Cypress, TX
    A great line makes an average running back great. A poor line makes a great running back average.

    If the Texans can get a dominant line going that can be consistent over the next decade they can plug an average runner into the backfield and he'll turn into a 1200yd 10td back.
     
  12. painekiller

    painekiller Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    On the West Belt
    What seem to be lost here is the OL was better than average at run blocking. And they were the worst in the league at pass blocking. People confuse the two different areas.

    Also IMO the big reason Bush was not taken had to do with him not appearing truthful when questioned about the scandal and him being a IMEMINE type. Bush was making it clear to the team they were lucky to get a shot at him.

    Give me the man Mario Williams is any day over the man Bush is.
     
  13. TexanBacker93

    TexanBacker93 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2004
    Messages:
    1,764
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    Cypress, TX
    I don't think the line was above average at run blocking. They were better than they were at pass blocking, though. There was a lot of room for improvement.
     
    infantrycak likes this.
  14. Tx'nFanLostInSkinCountry

    Tx'nFanLostInSkinCountry Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2006
    Messages:
    417
    Likes Received:
    11
    YES YES YES best post on the thread yet. Painekiller IMO you have said it all.
     
  15. Mysteryhunt

    Mysteryhunt Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    4
    my thoughts on bush: (from a usc student) he's good, but even if he is priest holmes/larry johnson good (which is unlikely i mean, come on), how well do the cheifs do with their outstanding running game. D MATTERS.
     
    SeƱor Stan likes this.
  16. NoBullTexan

    NoBullTexan Veteran

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Jersey Village
    That was proven by Arizona last year when they had two WRs with over 100 catches in a season and still was in the bottom of the league insofar as won lost records are concerned. They didn't have anybody that could run the bal and even if they did their offensive line was at least as bad as ours, if not worse. This year they have gone out and gottne the RB, but without the offensive line to block and the defense to keep the other team wihin striking distance, they will still be a bottom dweller. We on the other hand, did the smart thing in building up our defensive line, and we added one pro bowl type LB in DeMeco. We also improved our offensive line, and it will show, this year, in the won-loss column, and if we continue to build with defense first, we will get to that elusive championship we all thirst for. We did the right thing by not taking Bush.
     
  17. painekiller

    painekiller Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,070
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    On the West Belt

    And how many teams are beating down Jonathan Wells door. He had how many yds last year? DD is good but not so good that he always a 1000yd back.

    The team could run the ball, they just could not avoid the penalty or the sack.
     
    TexanBacker93 likes this.
  18. Doody

    Doody Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is why we go for the Adrian Peterson bowl this year
     
  19. TK_Gamer

    TK_Gamer Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 22, 2006
    Messages:
    1,029
    Likes Received:
    32
    I live in Kansas, saw plenty of holmes and johnson, bush will never be that. priest holmes is possibly one of the better pass blocking rb's in football, and he can catch like a slot reciever, hes a true vision rb, larry johnson is a beast he wont miss not having richardson to make holes for him, he makes his own holes. bush is a scatt back, anyone see the championship game? ever wonder why bush got 1/4 the carrys ? he couldnt run inside and the texas defense was to quick to the edge to run outside. bush had 2 good plays the whole game, one was a highlight reel touchdown run. but sorry, they lost the game, all that supposed talent and they didnt use him hardly till the game was out of reach anyway.

    now look at the talk from coaches , pro bowl/super bowl caliber players, telling us mario is a beast, he is the strongest athletic lineman they have ever seen. they say he moves like a DB, a 300 lb DB ! he has beat everyone on our team in 1 on 1's some very badly. lol

    yeah, I'll take Mario any day....
     
  20. Ye Olde Pro

    Ye Olde Pro Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    2
    Unfortunately I believe that way too much emphasis was put on Reggie Bush's flash, and not enough on his ability. I spent an awful lot of time watching this kid when it became obvious that we were likely to draft him, and what I saw did not get me too excited.

    He is a very talented, quick, elusive running back that in all likelyhood will be reasonably successful in the right system. But, go back and watch all the film of him and I do believe that you will find one glaring fault in his game. He goes down way too easy! As long as he is able to elude a defender he's cool, but put a hand on him and you've got him! Frankly I'm kind of surprised that he was able to avoid injury considering his style. And remember, all this flash and dash was against college teams. He won't be able to avoid collisions wth NFL players the way he did in school.

    I watched him in 4 games before USC played Texas, and in those 4 games I saw him break 2 tackles. Two!!! And I don't recall anything spectacular in the Rose Bowl either, where he faced, for the first time all season I might add, the kind of team speed that he'll see in the pros. Do you really want to spend that kind of money, and hang all of your hopes on a guy who Fall Down Go Boom???

    Have to admit I was surprised by the 1st pick, but not at all unhappy.

    Just my two cents.
     

Share This Page