...just curious

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by tsip, Apr 27, 2006.

  1. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    I may be wrong on this but I thought the consensus last year was that the 1st draft pick was for need and the rest were for BPA, or do I have it reversed?
     
  2. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    Yeah, I think you've got it backwards.
     
  3. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    Ok, so that would mean Travis Johnson was BPA last year and not for need...hmmm, interesting!!
     
  4. HJam72

    HJam72 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    11,617
    Likes Received:
    653
    Location:
    Over here.
    I don't know about that, I'm just speaking in general. What # was he picked in the draft?
     
  5. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    1st round
     
  6. tiger06

    tiger06 Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Messages:
    265
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Texarkana, TX
    16th

    you should draft BPA within reason at the top of the draft, then fill needs in the later rounds
     
  7. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    I think it was kind of both. They probably wanted an offensive lineman but no one was there that they wanted. Probably why they traded down a few spots.

    Then picked a player on the second need list, defensive line.

    Interesting though, we traded down and New Orleans took a tackle from Oklahoma, Jammal Brown.

    If I remember last year correctly, offensive line was a little light.
     
  8. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    My point is that Johnson was need, not BPA in the 1st round when Texans picked. From the mock drafts, virtually every other team is going for need with their 1st pick. Bush is not a need.
     


  9. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    I hear that thrown out at as fact and I don't understand why. If a guy doesn't fit a need and/or your system, what is the point? For example, Detriot has picked a WR for three years in a row in the top 10. I am sure all three of them were the BPA.

    Maybe that is where the reason part comes in that you mention.

    Please explain this though as you understand it because this statement is just throw out there and I have never heard why it is so important.

    My opinion, is it better to build a proven system that allows interchangeable parts on talent that is readily available. Look at Pittsburgh, New England, and Denver. They don't seem to get caught up in the BPA arguement. They draft to their system.
     
  10. Sarg01

    Sarg01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    37
    My personal rule is that your first rounder has to start by the midpoint of the season (except franchise QBs). 2nd rounders have to start by their 2nd year. 3rd rounders have to start by the 3rd year. Second-day picks are backups.

    It's sort of a midpoint between BPA and need.
     
  11. 4Texans

    4Texans Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Texas
    Those guys haven't really drafted very high in the first round over the years, so I would agree that they draft according to their needs. I think in the top 10 or less of the 1st round those guys are going to look at the BPA first and needs second.

    I would agree that we need defense first, but if you compare our need to BPA with the #1 pick overall. BPA wins out. If the Texans could have gotten a great deal they would have traded out of the #1 pick, IMO.

    Everyone has a different philosophy with the draft, and it depends on the talent levels year by year. Al Davis has always said you never pass up someone who can score touchdowns regardless of BPA or Need. If the Raiders had the #1 pick, who do you think they would go after this year?
     
  12. Sarg01

    Sarg01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    37
    Vince Young. But Al Davis is a pretty poor drafter.
     
  13. Texas_Thrill

    Texas_Thrill Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    H-Town stomping once again!
    I think when you're drafting in the top 5 or 10 even most folks are assuming BPA b/c you're so bad any body you pick will help.

    At bottom end where there are playoff teams they have weaknesses they want to shore up so they can pick more for need.

    That's always been my logic behind the thinking.

    Detroit is a very SPECIAL case of stupidity HOWEVER if you look at C. Rogers who has been pretty much MIA that pick of M. Williams could turn out to be alright especially if C Rog can never get his ish together.
     
  14. hollywood_texan

    hollywood_texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Messages:
    3,022
    Likes Received:
    213
    Thanks, that makes sense.
     
  15. 4Texans

    4Texans Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Texas
    VY just may be his guy, regardless of where they're drafting.
     
  16. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    "I think when you're drafting in the top 5 or 10 even most folks are assuming BPA b/c you're so bad any body you pick will help."

    I believe there is another point to make here--true, you may have many needs, so why would you take a player that does not fill a need? Too, there may be a player that is a 'once in a lifetime' player at a need position, so why would you not take him? I think the first round pick is for a 'critical' need position, a player that can offer a major immediate upgrade to that position. IMO, this thought is particularly true with the 1st pick of the draft!! How often does a team get one of those?

    Two yrs ago, DD had almost 1800 all purpose yds and 10 tds. Is Bush going to be a major upgrade at that position?
     
  17. 4Texans

    4Texans Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Texas
     
  18. tsip

    tsip Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    40
    ...if????????? What about are pass rusher needs? We are at 'zilch' there.
     
  19. 4Texans

    4Texans Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Texas
    We only have one #1 pick. Great DE's came around every other year or so. Guy's like Bush have the potential to be a player that comes along every 10 years maybe.. We signed Weaver which is hopefully an upgrade. We'll have to address pass rusher in the later rounds, FA, or trade. Of course it would be nice if someone presently on the team steps up in the new system.
     
  20. threetoedpete

    threetoedpete Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    6,644
    Likes Received:
    197
    Location:
    Katy, Texas
    I'm kinda of like this but different. You never pass up a franchise quarterback.

    A first rounder should be in the running for the probowl every year. 2nd rounder should be a starter and respected around the league as a blue chip player. 3rd rounder should have a 60 % chance of sticking on the team and be a substaintial contributer with in two years. 4th rounder, 50 % chance of making the team . 5th rounder 40 % chance of sticking on the roaster out of summer camp. You hit anything after the fourth round, give the scouts a bump. Also, each position is weighted. DE's are worth more than OLB's. Corners are worth more than safteis. OLT's are worth far more than the other offensive line postions. You're right about Bush, and let the record show, everyone in the national media has crownded him a can't miss super star. We're two deep at starting running backs, currently. When we draft prince reggie we'lll be three deep in starting RB's. He's projected to be such a major offensive power, they feel although there isn't a major need at running back,that RB creates such match up problems, he will elevate the overall play of the offense.
    You can bet they will come away with a young MLB (who doesn't have to start right away), a corner who can play nickle/dime, and saftey in a pinich and a good prospect to shore up Peek & Babin at DE befor the draft is over. Those three postions are major needs for '06 season. Judging by the moves, someone believes that we're close to making a push for a wild card next season with Reggie. So after the second, they will look for the BPA for those three back up spots.

    I have a different take, one that hasn't been expressed publicly on the Travis Johnson deal by the Texan's. And that is they targeted Derrick Johnson, got a deal to move down and still have a shot at Derrick Johnson and ended up having to take the BPA that filled a need after DJ went off the board. Travis Johnson will never be a pro-bowl player. At best he will be a jouneyman DT who will be a servicable player. In other words, he was drafted ten to twenty spots too soon. The star on that line at FSU at the DT position, Broderick Bunkley, will go about the same slot or higher this draft. It will be very interesting from here on out to compare the careers of the two. My book says Bunkley has the chance to be something very special.

    Personally, and I have stated this since January, in Reggie Bush we're getting Freeman McNiel , not Gale Sayers, Tony Dorsette, ( pick your Icon). I think it is a mistake. But as stated earliy, everyone in the national media assures us that Bush is a lock for the HOF. We'll see. He's the BPA.
     
    hollywood_texan likes this.

Share This Page