JoePa didn't wear a facemask. He doesn't think today's players should, either.

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Hookem Horns, Oct 21, 2010.

  1. Hookem Horns

    Hookem Horns That Server Guy Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    7,681
    Likes Received:
    1,103
  2. Kulluminatii

    Kulluminatii Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    232
    Location:
    California
    Interesting...remove the facemask, and you'll most likely end up with players being more careful when tackling. However, athletes of today are beasts compared to athletes from the early years of football...injuries might become much worse without helmets. Not worth the risk I think. I do believe however that the NFL should seriously invest in finding ways to make the gear athletes wear now much more effective, even if it means changing the gear football players use dramatically.

    *EDIT* These are two helmets I remember reading about a while ago.

    [​IMG]
    Link to article

    [​IMG]
    Link to article

    Both are reported to be better at providing protection from concussions and other risks to the head...but I guess we won't know for sure until the NFL/CFB/UFL uses them.
     
  3. Speedy

    Speedy Yeller Dweller

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,478
    Likes Received:
    443
    Location:
    The Livable Forest
    Didn't they used to play without helmets too? There you go, that takes care of any helmet to helmet.
     
  4. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    just go rugby with it and remove all padding and protection
     
  5. Carr Bombed

    Carr Bombed Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    14,218
    Likes Received:
    1,053
    Location:
    Wherever the US govt. sends me
    JoePa probably also didn't wear a condom back in the day too, should we all go that route?


    I'm getting tired of all these old timers (like Ditka) talking about how they need to get rid of the facemask. The game was completely different back then and while it would make violent hits less frequent, it would also create new horrific injuries.
     
  6. Showtime100

    Showtime100 Got AJ?

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    21,506
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    Austin,Tx
    Problem is, he's right. Hockey has known this for a while about extra padding but so far has done nothing about it.
     
  7. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    I think part of the problem with trying to remove the padding in football is the disparity in the sizes of the players...

    Yeah, it'll probably keep Dunta Robinson from running into Desean Jackson as hard as he did, but what about Demarcus Ware??

    I think he'd still light him up...I think even a guy like L. Landry would still crush DB's...Of course not head to head, but a shoulder or fore arm to the chest at that rate of speed could be just as devastating...
     
  8. awtysst

    awtysst Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,611
    Likes Received:
    497
    I am sure someone has already thought why this is a bad idea

    But, how about a rubber helmet. The rubber would be strong enough to insulate the head and would be soft enough that it wouldn't really be able to be used as a weapon?
     


  9. sakebomb

    sakebomb Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,275
    Likes Received:
    63
    Location:
    Humble, TX
    Are we still talking about Joe Paterno's sex life? :kitten:
     
  10. Number19

    Number19 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 2, 2004
    Messages:
    1,127
    Likes Received:
    62
    Ya, no face mask and let's go to single platoon football - 60 minute players.
     

Share This Page