If Mario is so 'terrible' at OLB...

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by House of Pain, Aug 24, 2011.

  1. House of Pain

    House of Pain Knee-jerkless

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2009
    Messages:
    335
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Houston
    why not move him to ILB?

    I know it sounds crazy, but if Wade (and Herring) claim they can control who is rushing at all times, then why not have Mario in the Middle and stop this "we can't stop the inside-the-tackle run" nonsense? Mario has established himself as a run stopper on the line, what would change that on the second level? He could still be a devastating pass rush threat and would never have to drop into coverage and use that supposed 'bull rush' of his? We may even move Cushing to the OLB position where he may do a little bit better since he's not pregnant anymore.

    :kitten:

    Am I crazy?
     
  2. 80tothezone

    80tothezone Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    1,598
    Likes Received:
    71
    Honestly I think he could be serviceable but he is pullin down 14 million ..... u can buy a lot of talent for 14 million... I hate to see him go but if he doesn't show anything in game 3 on Saturday we should look at trading him to a 4-3 for a better # 2 cb and some drat pics( not my idea but I agree with texan mike on this one).. We got plenty of what looks to be good talent behind him brooks reed, nading etc ..... like I said though I hope he proves me wrong sat against the niners and blows it up for 2 sacs and and assload of stops .... just don't think he will do it... also mario will line up everywhere so moving him to ilb won't really make a difference plus then you got to worry about him covering a back or slot receiver .... He needs to show up big on saturday and make it worth the 14 mil.
     
  3. drunkcookie

    drunkcookie 2 drunk 2 cook

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    75
    Location:
    the waterin' hole...
    I don't mind doing what works... if that's moving him to end and having everything else dominoe from there, that's fine...

    I'm not trusting in Mario to take to this position (OLB), I'm really just trusting WP to make the best decision for the D...
     
  4. mussop

    mussop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    423
    I have been saying this for awhile.




    In wades defense average players have racked up big numbers at strong ILB.
    Having mOre size in the middle coulnd only help.
    Mario's size is being wasted on the outside.
    This defense is predicated on speed of the edges. Mario isn't a speed guy.

    There are many many reasons Mario would be better in the middle but most here wont discuss it. They will just say, well i'll go with Wades opinion over yours.
     
  5. DocBar

    DocBar Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    522
    Location:
    I'm international
    at his natural 4-3 de position MW was only a devastating passrusher someof the time. As a 3-4 wolb, he's not getting anywhere near the penetration and disruption he got as de. He might make a decent wolb but I, for one, seriously doubt it will be this year he most likely won't be here next year. Since WP's 3-4 is usually a 1 gap system, de should be a better fit for him and still allow him to get sack chances, especially if a good edge rusher is forcing the qb to step up in the pocket.
     
  6. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,639
    Likes Received:
    1,655
    I feel Mario overall would be terrible as an inside pass rusher. He demonstrates virtually only one move............a bull rush the long way around the edge. He does not man handle anyone with his hands. When you go up the middle, you better have good hand skills and a variation of moves such as spin moves which Mario does not demonstrate.
     
  7. Texan_Bill

    Texan_Bill Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    48,673
    Likes Received:
    2,088
    Location:
    Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
    Who said he was terrible at OLB? He's played the position for roughly 3-4 weeks and looks somewhat uncomfortable right now... So what?
     
    Double Barrel likes this.
  8. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    13,031
    Likes Received:
    557
    Three man fronts are supposed to engage double teams that create the rushing lanes for OLB's. Watch small sample size (15 reps pre-season game one & first half game 2) other than maybe Watt who demanded double teams? Good question for 76Texan. Only way he can dominate is if the front three can take out the trash, in this context, Mario is very good @ taking out the trash & opening lanes while feasting on dinner :fridge:
     


  9. Tailgate

    Tailgate Fall of Hame

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,178
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Houston, TX - Born and raised
    Exactly. Does everyone honestly think Mario has tapped out already at OLB from a few plays in the preseason?
     
  10. BigBull17

    BigBull17 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    5,122
    Likes Received:
    228
    Location:
    Friendswood
    I'll wait till I see an actual game before I'll say he's good/bad/average. Wade hasn't even open the playbook past page 3.
     
  11. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,639
    Likes Received:
    1,655


    PAGE 4 PREVIEW


    [​IMG]
     
  12. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,697
    Likes Received:
    685
    I think this is a bad example. Watt is so good a second lineman can't get over in time to help out. Chuck Norris' birth certificate shows JJ Watt is his real father.
     
  13. Errant Hothy

    Errant Hothy Hypermediocrity

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    10,004
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Keller, Tx
    Do you think he's lack of an explosive first step is due to being uncomfortable? I just dont think he's shown any flash in the pass rushing situations, am willing to cut him some slack when dropping into coverage. But he hasn't looked all that impressive in pure pass rushing situations. Yes, he got close to Brees; but close don't men shit. I've seen him get close to Manning for several years now, and we've still only bet them a small handfull of times.

    If we going to move MW, moving him to DE would seem to be the most logically place to move him. Now would he want to move there, I doubt it. 43 DE and 34 OLB are positions that get paid and going into a contract year MW is thinking about getting paid. Wasn't Wade talking about making MW a 5 tech when he first go here?
     
    Double Barrel likes this.
  14. DocBar

    DocBar Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    522
    Location:
    I'm international
    In WPs system, the dl are one gap penetrators. That's why he thinks we are ok without the road grader that CnD wants. That's why I mentioned MW at de. CnD made some interesting comments on that.
     
  15. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,349
    Likes Received:
    1,890
    Location:
    Texas
    Yes..... I do believe you are.
     
  16. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    39,349
    Likes Received:
    1,890
    Location:
    Texas
    If there are really any questions about Mario Williams at OLB, the only real move, would be to put him back at DE.

    But if you're looking at your playmakers, you're going to be taking one of them off the field.

    JJ Watt, Antonio Smith, Mario Williams.

    I want them all on the field as often as possible.

    Brooks Reed looks good, & deserve 1st team reps in the preseason. But you're hoping on a prayer if that is your plan going into the season. If he turns out to be legit & truly deserving to be on the field, then it's Connor Barwin who should come off. Not Mario.

    Of course I like the idea of kicking Watt inside & removing Cody, or even kicking Smith inside but both of those options (I think) are worse than keeping Mario at OLB.

    I remember after our game against Denver...... Battle Red, Mario had 2 sacks (maybe 3). I think he played standing up quite a bit & for the most part, we all asked to see more of it. Now that the Texans have done so, I don't really understand the resistance.

    I think if the Texans decided to play Mario at DE we would still be complaining about it.
     
  17. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    The reason Mario moved to OLB is because he wanted to rush the QB. He wouldn't get that chance as much as a 3-4 DE. I doubt he'd be willing to move to ILB.
     
  18. Dutchrudder

    Dutchrudder King of the Potato People

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2010
    Messages:
    15,109
    Likes Received:
    1,358
    Location:
    Houston
    Umm, how about moving him back to DE where he has played well for 5 years?
     
  19. DocBar

    DocBar Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    10,152
    Likes Received:
    522
    Location:
    I'm international
    Think we, as fans, are getting too emotional about this. No one is saying MW is a scrub who needs to be cut. Those of us who don't like this move are universally saying to move him back to de and, if possible, trade him. Not because he sux, but because of his cap hit, playing way out of position and this is the last year of his contract. Try to get something rather than hope for a 3 rd comp pick. I think MW is a good de. I don't think he'll make a good olb in time to do us much good this season. This appears to be a one year experiment.
     
  20. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,829
    Likes Received:
    2,583
    I think I've firmly established that I enjoy complaining and that rarely if ever can the Texans make me happy about anything they do or attempt to do.

    I'm the guy waiting for the other shoe to fall.

    I'm the guy who's not just worried about the sucker punch/kick to the groin every year, I'm almost counting on it.

    Having said that even I think it's too soon to get pessimistic about Mario. It's too soon to get pessimistic about any of it. Three or four weeks from now they could be just completely epic or they could be a joke. When that time comes, IF that time comes then Mario isn't going to move somewhere else on this defense. He's an asset who will be part of a sign and trade deal to get whatever it is we will need to fix whatever it is that isn't working.

    Trust me, I'll let you all know when it's time to get really, really, really upset about how things are going. :)
     
    thunderkyss likes this.

Share This Page