How to kill the NFL

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by Tedc, Oct 15, 2007.

  1. Tedc

    Tedc Hardheaded

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    349
    Location:
    Bull Pen
    Roger Goodell say he will study a plan to put receivers in offensive players helmets to combat crowd noise and reduce the home field advantage.

    "EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J.--Roger Goodell said today that one of the issues he's studying in his early days as NFL commissioner is whether the league should take steps to nullify the competitive advantage that some teams get from crowd noise in their home stadiums.

    In an afternoon meeting with reporters at Giants Stadium, Goodell said he loves having loud, enthusiastic crowds at games but wonders whether the offenses of visiting clubs should have to suffer when their players can't hear quarterbacks' signals. Goodell said that he and members of the league's competition committee will study possible remedies, including a suggestion to place radio receivers in the helmets of other offensive players so that they can hear the quarterback over the crowd noise."


    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/nflinsider/2006/09/commissioner_says_hell_study_p.html


    This is one way to take the passion out of the game experience. Does anyone know an e-mail for Goodell??:bat: :bat:
     
  2. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,888
    Likes Received:
    1,980
    Location:
    Houston
    This is absolute idiocy. I can’t believe I’m reading this.

    If this is the case, why not just put receivers in all the players’ helmets? Maybe the Texans will play better if they are listening to their favorite songs on the field.
     
  3. mancunian

    mancunian Daleks Rule

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2004
    Messages:
    2,254
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irela
    Crowd is noise is part of the game, and each team has 8 at home and 8 away. No need for that.
     
    disaacks3 likes this.
  4. Buffi2

    Buffi2 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,548
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    livingston, texas
    I wouldn't stake my life on this being a valid address - but this is what I found on a couple of animal rights websites.

    Roger.Goodell2@nfl.net

    This is a very bad idea, imo.
     
  5. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,460
    Likes Received:
    742
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    Oh I dunno . .

    Being since those dumbasses at Reliant don't know how to keep their traps shut while our own offense is on the field, I'm thinking this is a good thing.

    Put me down for a 'yea'.
     
  6. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,684
    Likes Received:
    227
    Location:
    CPH
    Make it for all players then... no reason to hurt defense with even more rules aimed at protecting recievers.
     
  7. dannyboy

    dannyboy Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    An oasis in the desert
    As bad as this idea is, and it's pretty bad, it's nowhere near as bad as his idea of adding a 17th game to the schedule and making each team play one regular season game overseas.

    Once that happens, making the season longer, they can change the overtime rules to make the games longer. Then we can see some real injuries pile up.

    There will be 2 teams signing QBs on Wednesday to play on Sunday every week like there was this past week. Gotta throw in the excessively long suspensions too.

    Plenty of 4th string QBs handing off to 4th string RBs to look forward to in the NFL of the future.
     
  8. SheTexan

    SheTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    7,142
    Likes Received:
    778
    Location:
    Pasadena, Texas
    Just makes me long for the good old days, before the NFL decided to take away all the fun. They keep this garbage up and fans will have more fun sitting in front of huge plasma TVs, either at home or in a bar, then spending a small fortune to attend a game.

    IMHO, I think they should ban ALL electronic receivers. Let the boys go out and play the damn game the old fashioned way. THe NFL has messed with the game enough as it is. Leave it to hell alone!! JMO!!
     


  9. real

    real Guest

    From a players point of view, I think they'd love it.

    But part of the fan experience is trying to be as loud as you can to make the opposing offense make mistakes...

    I dunno...
     
  10. jaayteetx

    jaayteetx Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2005
    Messages:
    3,583
    Likes Received:
    240
    Location:
    Albuquerque,NM
    Remember when they used to try to quiet the crowd by giving the home team a penalty? Ya, this is just as stupid. This is the one way fans feel they can influence a game and be part of the team. They pay their hard earn money to go into the game, they should be able to do it. The fans are the reason this game is around, they better never forget that or it will turn into the NBA!
     
  11. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,487
    Likes Received:
    993
    Stupid idea Goddell. The fans pay your salary, as well as the players salary. The game is too sanitized as it is for my tastes. The home field advantage is part of the game and should remain so. Every team has 8 home games, so it's not as if there is an unfair advantage.
     
  12. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    1,071
    I do not have Goodell's address.

    But I wrote this for you, Ted.

    Roger Goodell Wants To Make Fans Irrelevant

    Please I urge those of you who care about this issue to leave a comment. (The comment thing asks to leave an email address, but AOL doesn't use that for anything so no worries). I know that the NFL folks read FanHouse--I came about *this* close to getting an interview with someone from the league office about the 45 second rule with video content.

    So, there is an email this function at the bottom of the article. Feel free to email it to those you think can make sure they don't change things.

    But please leave a comment on the article. Doesn't need to be much. Individuals working together can make a difference. That's what home field advantage is all about.
     
  13. Errant Hothy

    Errant Hothy Hypermediocrity

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    10,004
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Keller, Tx
    Well since the competition comittee is made up mainly of owners and coaches, both groups who want to win, I doubt they would approve this.

    Now, I'm not opposed to making sure there is no "artifical: crows noise.
     
  14. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,485
    Likes Received:
    3,157
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    Our defense never seems able to stop a 3rd and long no matter how loud we are as fans. I'm up in the air if 'homefield advantage' is all that.

    The flip side of this issue is that our offense will have the same advantage going into opponents stadiums, so it can help us, as well.
     
  15. real

    real Guest

    I can see this getting approved...

    Most of the time crowd noise causes false starts, not really mistakes by the recievers so much...

    So in essence it still wouldn't change that much...

    It'd just make it easier for the QB's and recievers to communicate...Instead of the reciever having to come to the tackle box to hear what the QB is saying , he can can just hear it in his ear piece....But offensive linemen would still false start because of not being able to hear the cadence...

    Not that big a deal now that I think about it...
     
  16. BigBull17

    BigBull17 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 13, 2005
    Messages:
    5,122
    Likes Received:
    228
    Location:
    Friendswood
    This is one way to take the passion out of the game experience. Does anyone know an e-mail for Goodell??:bat: :bat: [/QUOTE]

    Um, patsfan899009@nfl.com?
     
  17. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    1,071
    They are not just studying the putting receivers in offensive player's helmets, they are studying ALL WAYS of reducing crowd noise effects on opposing players. This might end up being one of those changes that happens, before anyone has a chance to really beyotch about it.

    As for the Texans defense not being helped by crowd noise on 3rd downs, I sure as heck hope that this is a temporary thing and not something that will plague the Texans for the rest of their existence.

    I truly believe that any thing that they would do beyond what is already in place to reduce the effect of crowd noise on visiting offenses, would take away some of the emotion of the game.
     
  18. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    1,071
    As long as the playing field is level, why should they care? Maybe the teams with better home field advantages would.

    The owners watch the games from luxury boxes. That's a different experience than trying to yell to get a team to false start, or call a time out.
     
  19. powerfuldragon

    powerfuldragon g'mornin to you

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    17,146
    Likes Received:
    1,117
    Location:
    your lady's sexdreams.
    Lame idea and i'm flabbergasted that Goodell would even waste his time entertaining this notion.
     
  20. Errant Hothy

    Errant Hothy Hypermediocrity

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    10,004
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Keller, Tx
    I think owners like Jerry Jones and coaches like BB would certainly care.

    They know when the fans are responsible for causing a false start or a delay of game, and they know that those penalties can help there team win; which is what they care most about in the world. Plus it would remove a competitive advantage they get from 8 of there games every year, and I don't think they (the owners and coaches) would go for that.

    I also think that the competition comittee would point to the fact taht the problems caused by crowed noise can be over come, and routinly are be the better coached teams in the NFL.

    In theory the advantage gained from being at home is equal for everyteam, as they all get 8 home games.
     

Share This Page