Houston Texans 2009 grades

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by 2slik4u, Jan 6, 2010.

  1. 2slik4u

    2slik4u Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,001
    Likes Received:
    112
    Location:
    round rock
  2. Errant Hothy

    Errant Hothy Hypermediocrity

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    10,004
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Keller, Tx
    I really don't understand how the Raiders can be a D and the Chiefs an F, but maybe that's just me.

    AS for the Texans grade, ok i guess.
     
  3. mexican_texan

    mexican_texan Furry Tractors

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    14,192
    Likes Received:
    515
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Jeez. You'd think ESPN could hire a fact-checker.
     
  4. Ndevine7

    Ndevine7 All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    New York
    What do u think they deserved?
     
  5. mexican_texan

    mexican_texan Furry Tractors

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    14,192
    Likes Received:
    515
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    In what ways were the Raiders worth a D but not the Chiefs?
     
  6. Ndevine7

    Ndevine7 All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    New York
    The Raiders beat multiple talented teams Cinn Pitt Eagles while what did the chiefs do beat the falling broncos
     
  7. Errant Hothy

    Errant Hothy Hypermediocrity

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    10,004
    Likes Received:
    500
    Location:
    Keller, Tx
    I would have flipped them. The Chiefs have a much better offense, to the tune of 97 more points over the course of the season. Also Clayton seems to give them an F for rebuilding the D, and while KC's D needs some work the offense seems to be rounding into shape nicely and Oakland's O needs a lot more work then KC's D.

    FYI, the Chiefs also beat Pitt.
     
  8. Ndevine7

    Ndevine7 All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    532
    Likes Received:
    26
    Location:
    New York
    Ok i see your point, idk IMO Oakland is a more dangerous team(neither i would ever call dangerous) but i can see your agruement that they both should be D's
     


  9. TexCanada

    TexCanada Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2009
    Messages:
    3,337
    Likes Received:
    157
    Location:
    Calgary, Canada
    We shouldn't be better than the Ravens since they made playoffs and we didn't. I think both teams should be a B.
     
  10. imatexan

    imatexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,792
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    can someone please tell me why Andre Johnsons name is in an ESPN poll of "least deserving Pro Bowlers"!?!?!

    Not to mention they hae two other Texans on the list.

    Pathetic.
     
  11. Ryan

    Ryan THIS YEAR

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    5,345
    Likes Received:
    285
    Location:
    Beaumont,Tx
    Are you serious? If so, WTF.
     
  12. TheIronDuke

    TheIronDuke Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,232
    Likes Received:
    450
  13. Ryan

    Ryan THIS YEAR

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    5,345
    Likes Received:
    285
    Location:
    Beaumont,Tx
    Wow, ESPN is full of dipsh*ts. Yeah, the leading receiver in the NFL doesn't deserve to get into the Pro Bowl, give me a ^$%^$ break.
     
  14. TheRealJoker

    TheRealJoker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,803
    Likes Received:
    274
    Location:
    Conroe
    Its a shame they couldn't add the Ravens to that list :(
     
  15. Goatcheese

    Goatcheese Nightmare Over

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,296
    Likes Received:
    676
    They couldn't just put Tom Brady on the list by himself. They needed filler.
     
  16. wagonhed

    wagonhed Team Gruden

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    194
    Location:
    Denton
    He also gave the Jets a B+. That makes me question everything he says.
     
  17. wagonhed

    wagonhed Team Gruden

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,455
    Likes Received:
    194
    Location:
    Denton
    Bunch of ******* idiots. 5 people on the list and 3 of them are Texans. ESPN can ******* shove it.
     
  18. Section516

    Section516 Warrior

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,329
    Likes Received:
    139
    Typically, I'd say all this is us being sensitive ect. But man, that's pretty jacked. AJ being on there, period, is absurd. Ryans had an incredible year. Only one i can say shouldn't be there in Pro Bowl terms, is Mario. And thats because he doesn't have OMG sacks. However, he does have the QB pressures and hits..

    Le Sigh.
     
  19. BIG TORO

    BIG TORO TERADACTYL #23

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    310
    Location:
    Sugar Land, TX
    Well it is redicoulous, but when you vote it shows only 2% said andre, while 44% voted tom brady should not be there which I think is dead right Matt schaub should be in, instead of Brady
     
  20. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,486
    Likes Received:
    991
    I can see Mario being on the list because he was borderline. Ryans deserved it and AJ was not only pro-bowl, but easily All Pro calibur. That one in particular is pathetic. What, they couldn't find one other player less deserving?
     

Share This Page