HOU draws the line at $24 million?

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Dr. Toro, Apr 25, 2006.

  1. Dr. Toro

    Dr. Toro All Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    13
  2. thetexanator

    thetexanator All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    17
    hehe, must be some really good bush:redtowel:
     
  3. LongBignasty1

    LongBignasty1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    144
    Likes Received:
    2
  4. O.G.

    O.G. Veteran

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2004
    Messages:
    470
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Clear Lake
    They simply can't becuse of the NFL's new CBA prohibiting the number of years you can pro-rate a signing bonus. It decreased from 7 years to 5 with an optional year thus limiting how much they can give. Also add in there, they won't know how much they will have for the rookie pool until after the draft.
     
  5. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,950
    Likes Received:
    1,768
    Location:
    Texas
    Personally, I would have found it hard to believe that they would go over $24 mil gauranteed....... I mean he's a runningback....... same goes for Mario. I could see Matt.......... or another QB expecting more.... but not any other position.... maybe a little more for a corner.............. maybe, if he's good enough to be the #1 overall.
     
  6. Sportsfan

    Sportsfan All Pro

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Messages:
    586
    Likes Received:
    11
    Location:
    979

    LMAO! :redtowel:
     
  7. texan279

    texan279 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    6,170
    Likes Received:
    160
    Location:
    Rosenberg TX
    If I'm not mistaken, Alex Smith got $24 million in guaranteed money in his contract last year.
     
  8. kbourda

    kbourda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Here's my point. Had the Texan brass spent the money in the first place to acquire top notch talent they would not have the #1 pick. Now they want to set a limit on what a player is signed to. Someone help me understand.
     


  9. Mr. White

    Mr. White H-Town Beatdown

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    6,020
    Likes Received:
    422
    Location:
    Sugar Land
    Makes me think that the report of the $30 million signing bonus really was true.
     
  10. cuppacoffee

    cuppacoffee Resident Grouch

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,922
    Likes Received:
    448
    Not too sure what you mean?

    We have the #1 pick because our previous coaches ? didn't have a clue.
     
  11. Texansfan30

    Texansfan30 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's not about 'spending the money' to acquire top notch talent. The Texans have the reputation of overpaying, not underpaying. They certainly gave Carr a lot of money. Plus, when you are an expansion team (or a generally bad teama - think Cardinals, Saints), it takes even more money to get players. Who wants to come to a bad team? You have to overpay to entice them to come here, and it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.

    The problem here has been bad coaching and bad draft picks. The first round picks are either home runs or 'ungraded'. D. Robinson and A. Johnson were home runs. Travis Johnson is ungraded, and I think it's fair to say Carr is ungraded since we haven't really given him enough around him to succeed.

    The 2nd and 3rd round picks have been disasters. Peek and Pitts are about the best we've done with them. Charles Hill? Does anyone remember that name? A 3rd round NT that didn't even get out of training camp. Bennie Joppru? Gaffney? Fred Weary? Babin may turn out to be a better DE than he was LB, but we traded our 2, 3, and 4 for him. These were all disastrous moves. And don't even get me started on Philip Buchanon.

    This isn't about them not paying for talent. It's about their talent evaluation. After the first round, it's atrocious.
     
  12. kbourda

    kbourda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    Ok, if we all are aware that late pick talent judgement is poor would it be possible to get better talent via FA? That's my point. And not the Cass way (offering a player that tore his ACL, MCL, and PCL in both knees and offer them a 4yr/35 mil contract based on potential) either.
     
  13. kbourda

    kbourda Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,418
    Likes Received:
    64
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    True enough they had something to do with it as well but so did talent.
     
  14. Mike Kerns

    Mike Kerns LYSB Podcast

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2005
    Messages:
    2,645
    Likes Received:
    97
    Location:
    West Houston
    If this were true, I would expect that it would be on more news outlets than some dudes blog. We all know and have said to expect tons of crazy rumors & BS this week. If the FO wants Bush, they will get it done.
     
  15. Caphorn

    Caphorn Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2006
    Messages:
    81
    Likes Received:
    1
    The Chronicle reported this morning that the number will need to be below $24MM because of the pro-rating issue identified correctly by OG (note that there has been talk that the assumptions by McLain about Smith's contract and the prorating of his bonus are wrong)

    I honestly think other than a couple of boneheaded draft moves (trading up for Jason Babin and picking up the Hollings experiment) we've done OK in the draft. Just look at the players around the ones you ***** about sometime and you'll find that Houston's done fairly average and maybe above average. Some of the deals we talk about (Gaffney over Josh Reed for example) are ones that look bad in hinsight, but on a pre-draft basis, most prognosticators had Gaffney over Josh Reed. Joppru - who knows? I'm sure Casserly didn't know going in that Joppru would blow out his knee. I'm also not convinced that poor coaching hasn't been the bigger contributor to our poor line play. I'd like to see where some of these guys like Pitts develop under good coaching. I think where we did the worst was in trying to draft into the 3-4 in general. We really took some stabs at this with selecting Travis Johnson (when an obviously better Johnson was on the board) and the afore-mentioned Babin deal. But that's kind of the name of the game when you select an unusual defensive alignment and you make the mistake of focusing too much on need over best player available.
     
    thunderkyss likes this.
  16. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,702
    Likes Received:
    2,714
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Alex Smith signed a 6 year contract last year because of the time period for the expiration of the old CBA. Prior 1st rounders like Carr and AJ had been signing 7 year contracts. The CBA extension dictates the maximum length for picks #1-16 is 6 years so the proration time period is the same for Smith and this year's top pick.
     
  17. Kaiser Toro

    Kaiser Toro Native Mod

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,229
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    Location:
    Straight Outta Austin
  18. MikeMc

    MikeMc All Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2004
    Messages:
    767
    Likes Received:
    6
    Location:
    Spring, TX
    Good point ^^^^...300 more yards and one more TD......that's like an extra yr of production for Reed.

    Reed was in a 3 WR set, Gaffney was in a 1 WR set (AJ or bust).
     
  19. mj.

    mj. Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    3
     
  20. 1-3

    1-3 Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    1
    22 million and a nice house for his folks should do it.
     

Share This Page