Draft Best player or Position?

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by Goldeagle, Nov 30, 2005.

  1. Goldeagle

    Goldeagle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    42
    Location:
    Spring
    I say Position until the later rounds

    1. OT (D'brick, or Scott from UT)
    2. OLB/ILB (Chad Greenway, AJ Hawk) (Unless we get Lavar Arrington)
    3. O-Line ( Tyler McMeans, WInston Justice
    4. Safety (Slay, Pat Watkins)
    Rounds 5, 6, 7: best player
     
  2. cadahnic

    cadahnic All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    18
    First Jon Scott unless he shows something impressive will slide to late first round or second round. D'Brick is not the right guy for us. Greenway and Hawk are nice, but unless you found out about an extra pick then we should be looking at Ahmad Brooks and Rocky McIntosh. Your oline picks are relatively solid if we are taking the guys late in the first day or early second day. Slay is a hitter and could come in and be the SS we have missed Watkins is average at best and would be a reach at anything over the 4 or 5th rounds.
     
  3. Napa Auto Parts

    Napa Auto Parts Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,186
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Houston
    My Believe is were ever you pick is draft best player available. if you draft by need your cutting yourself short.
     
  4. hot pickle

    hot pickle Canada Eh

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,468
    Likes Received:
    66
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    I say McIntosh if we can get him in the 2nd or 3rd round
    and Doesn't NC STATE have some real good DE's
    this is what i think we need

    DE/LB (a DeMarcus Ware type player)
    G
    S
    CB
    TE

    those arent in order cause im not sure what we will need the most
    and the reason i have G instead of Tackle is because, Pitts has looked real good
    but maybe a RT would be nice
     
  5. infantrycak

    infantrycak Semi-grand Poobah Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    53,986
    Likes Received:
    2,458
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Yup, drafting for need or position is a sure way to end up with a less talented team. Teams should draft by bpa with elimination for absolutely cap crazy position picks--both completely unneeded positions and positions that don't deserve the relative money (kickers in the 1st).
     
  6. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,528
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Location:
    Texas
    Then you'll have too much talent that can't help you.......Detroit has a QB(whom I've liked since Oregon) and three wide recievers, but still can't get the ball out there.

    NewEngland/Denver do not have the most talented players on their teams.

    Trade down if you gots to, but you've got to pick the players that fit your system....you've got to get players that fill positions to allow you to do what you want to do.

    If we'd always drafted the best player, we'd have a team full of WRs & D-Lineman.
     
  7. MorKnolle

    MorKnolle Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    3,210
    Likes Received:
    127
    In the NBA you can draft best player available or based more on potential rather than going for filling needs at specific positions because the game is much more versatile and most players can play several positions. However, the NFL is much more of a team sport and you have to be pretty solid at all positions rather than having an overload of great players at a few positions and ignoring filling holes in other spots. Look at the Lions, they have drafted a WR in the first round the last three years because they were the best player available and their defense and OLine are not very good because they keep getting ignored. Generally, especially in the early first round, the "best player available" is going to be a skill position (QB, RB, WR) and you can't keep loading up on those with high picks and ignoring the other holes on your team and expect to get better.
     
  8. cadahnic

    cadahnic All Pro

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    18
    Mork you are right the Lions are the best example of BPA going wrong. Yeah they have weapons, but they dont have the OL to block for them or the D to stop the opposing skill players from running up the score.

    BTW DAMN the NBA for drafting for potential I want to win now. That was because of my teams poor performance and you know who I mean. Go Blue and Gold.
     
  9. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,528
    Likes Received:
    1,672
    Location:
    Texas
    The NBA can get away with it because they only play 5 men at a time...one man is 20% of your team from the word go. It's easier for the BPA to make a difference, and it's easier to build around that one man from year to year. If only Allen Iverson would make it to practise as a team, they would've taken it all by now.

    The NFL, it's a process. You need a system, you need the players, then they've all got to work together.
     
  10. uhcougar08

    uhcougar08 SHSUKATS08

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Kingwood, Texas
    Thats why if Reggie Bush is number 1 graded player and we have the number 1 pick, you take him.
     
  11. infantrycak

    infantrycak Semi-grand Poobah Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    53,986
    Likes Received:
    2,458
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    If you stay at #1 and believe he is BPA then yes. Or you can trade down for fair value to fill more holes. Staying put is not the only option.
     
  12. uhcougar08

    uhcougar08 SHSUKATS08

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Kingwood, Texas
    I am biased on Bush, but for the right trade, I completely agree.
     
  13. Texas_Thrill

    Texas_Thrill Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,473
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    H-Town stomping once again!
    I'm not biased towards anything at this point. I'll wait to see what our off-season looks like. Some NEEDS we have now might not be there come draft and we draft bpa (not likely).

    Or we can have some NEEDS we still need to fill and draft the BPA for that need.

    Amazing you can do either or with the #1 pick b/c we just that damn bad.
     
  14. uhcougar08

    uhcougar08 SHSUKATS08

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2005
    Messages:
    339
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Kingwood, Texas
    BPA is the Heisman trophy winner, right? Isn't that what BPA means?
     
  15. tulexan

    tulexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    5,080
    Likes Received:
    106
    Not necessarily. Eric Crouch was the heisman winner, but he was far from the best player available going into the draft.
     
  16. infantrycak

    infantrycak Semi-grand Poobah Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    53,986
    Likes Received:
    2,458
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Not even close. The Heisman trophy is for the best college QB or RB sometimes from a top 10 team--it really isn't even about being the best college player, much less prospective pro-player.
     
  17. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    7,999
    Likes Received:
    447
    Jason White, anybody?
     

Share This Page