Cowboys Sign Emmitt Smith

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by texasguy346, Mar 18, 2005.

  1. texasguy346

    texasguy346 Mod Squad

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,112
    Likes Received:
    343
    Location:
    Deer Park, TX
    I know there are a few Cowboy fans here so I figured you'd like to know about Emmitt's return to Dallas.

    Yahoo Sports

    Not too surprising, and it was a classy move by Jones.
     
  2. gg no re

    gg no re iggnorent

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    522
    Now for Jerry Rice to get the memo.
     
  3. StarStruck

    StarStruck Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    4,856
    Likes Received:
    284
    Location:
    Missouri City, Texas
    Thanks for the info, appreciate it!
     
  4. WWJD

    WWJD Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,260
    Likes Received:
    139
    Thanks. I saw the story on the Dallas Morning News online.

    Nice gesture.
     
  5. YodAa

    YodAa All Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    Messages:
    915
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Houston,TX
    I think that is one of the most classy ways to retire. Retiring with the team who thought you had what it took to be succesful in the NFL and picked you in the draft. I hope Johnson Davis Robinson and Carr all end up retiring with us like Smith did wit the Boys.
     
  6. Koruptified

    Koruptified Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    0
    I hope Mark Brunell retires as a Jag... of course he'll have to come back like Emmit did.
     
  7. edo783

    edo783 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    7,712
    Likes Received:
    308
    Location:
    Houston, again.
    Good for Emmit. It's about time the Cowpies showed a little class. It's been in very short supply there for a few years.
     
  8. FILO_girl

    FILO_girl I'm not here

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1,676
    Likes Received:
    86
    Location:
    HOU-finally moved in the big city
    That is awesome. I was hoping that Emmitt could do this. :)
     


  9. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    I'd bet in hindsight Parcells and Jones wish they had signed him to play for Dallas the last two years--no public black eye and production at least as good Hambrick/George.
     
  10. StarStruck

    StarStruck Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    4,856
    Likes Received:
    284
    Location:
    Missouri City, Texas
    I was disappointed that salary issues wouldn't allow the Cowboys to afford Emmitt those last two years, and glad he had a chance to play with a team that could. As for Hambrick, I was never believed that he could contribute as a starter. He wanted his opportunity to shine at the expense of Emmitt's playing time, and he still couldn't get the job done in Dallas or Arizona.
     
  11. WWJD

    WWJD Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,260
    Likes Received:
    139

    Jerry I'm sure would have kept Emmitt if he could have.

    Bill I'm not so sure about.
     
  12. SheTexan

    SheTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    7,142
    Likes Received:
    778
    Location:
    Pasadena, Texas
    I thought they already did that, sometime around SB time. He was activated for a day so he could retire a Cowgirl.
     
  13. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Don't know who made the decision but collectively Jerry/Bill wanted him gone. Emmitt said he would play for much less money than he had been. In response, they only offered Emmitt league minimum to come back. JMO but that was almost insulting and was only done so they could say they made him an offer. In contrast, just a year later they gave Eddie George (3.3, 3.4 and 3.0 ypc in the 3 years prior to Dallas signing him) who wasn't performing as well as Emmitt (3.8, 3.9 & 4.1 in the 3 yrs prior to leaving Dallas) a $1.5 mil signing bonus and contract which with incentives could have reached $4.5 mil total.
     
  14. Double Barrel

    Double Barrel Modified Simian

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Messages:
    33,282
    Likes Received:
    3,009
    Location:
    Onward, Upward, and back into the Trees
    Cheese alert!

    Sorry, but this little smoke screen and mirrors routine does not erase the embarassment of ES playing as a Cardinal for the past two years.

    Who are they trying to fool, anyway?

    :loser
     
  15. Huge

    Huge Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    63
    Location:
    Out yonder way...
    Emmitt's last 4 years with Dallas:

    1999 1397 yards, 4.2 avg, 11 TDs
    2000 1203 yards, 4.1 avg, 9 TDs
    2001 1021 yards, 3.9 avg, 3 TDs
    2002 975 yards, 3.8 avg, 5 TDs

    Anybody else see a trend? Can anybody explain how it would've made sense to bring him back for the amount of money he was looking for? And spare me the "he said he'd take a lot less to play in Dallas". This is what they always say after they get their fat contract with another team. It's called public relations...something Emmitt is very familiar with.

    It was sad to see him go. It always is. But it was his time and everybody but Emmitt knew it. Just as it was Aikman's. He could've/should've retired a Cowboy 2 seasons ago. How this is the Cowboy's organization's fault is laughable.
     
  16. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Or it is laughable that you feel you have to defend every single decision by the Cowboy's organization--obviously they have made a few bad ones over the past few years (and I wish they hadn't as I am one of the few Texans & Cowboys fans). And italics aside, Emmitt said he would take far less before they even made the minimum contract offer. By the way, how do you know how much money he was looking for?

    3.7, 3.0, 3.4 & 3.3 ypc--see a trend? Maybe not, maybe it is a consistancy of performing horribly in comparison to the meager 3.8 ypc Emmitt was putting out. But obviously it justified a $4.5 mil contract.

    4.5, 4.2, 4.0 ypc--see a trend? Oops 4.6 ypc the next year. Maybe there is more than just being old that can account for decreased or increased production.
     
  17. StarStruck

    StarStruck Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    4,856
    Likes Received:
    284
    Location:
    Missouri City, Texas
    Back during the time of Emmitt's impending departure, I read that he had a meeting with Jerry Jones and the Cowboys offered him more than league minimum, but far below what he could have made with another team. IMHO, Emmitt was all about the business of getting the best contract possible under those circumstances, and he went for the best offer on the table. I'm happy that now that he has handled his business, he can now return and retire from the team for which he was so great.
     
  18. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Well I can't find anything about it anymore so I guess this is one where everyone's impressions will be colored by the quality or lack thereof of the reporting they saw. I read a report that the only offer was league minimum and I certainly thought not offering something extra was insulting. Of course if that isn't the way it went down then opinions could be different. It is odd to me they couldn't get a deal done along the lines of the Cardinals contract and then turn around a year later and throw stupid money at Eddie George.
     
  19. Huge

    Huge Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    63
    Location:
    Out yonder way...
    If you're under the impression I feel the need to defend "every single decision", that would be laughbale. Or were you just using an exaggeration in a lame attempt to make another poster look bad? Those that have known me here the longest are fully aware of past contempt I've had over decisions that have been made (Vinny, Eddie George, Bledsoe, etc.).

    Are you referring to George's contract? A few points of interest concerning George's contract:

    1. It wasn't $4.5 million. It was $660,000 (which BTW, was the league minimum for a veteran such as George).

    2. George was signed the season after Emmitt left. It wasn't as if George replaced him. He was brought in after they realized Hambrick wasn't the answer. If you really wanted to make this point, you should've brought up how much Hambrick (the guy that was expected to replace Emmitt after averaging 4.6 ypc in 3 seasons) made.

    3. The $4.5 million was entirely incentive based. Are you aware of what those incentives were (I'm not...just asking out of curiosity)? Do you believe Dallas had any concerns he was going to reach those incentives after drafting Julius Jones in the 2nd round? Even with Jones missing half the season George still didn't reach the incentives.

    Curtis Martin? And I agree about the increase/decrease in production. Like having a solid offensive line or a respectable passing game (like Martin has in New York). Was Emmitt going to find a similar situation in Dallas? If not, why would it make sense to devote a lot of money towards a position that wasn't going to produce much when you could find better value (slightly less than/equal production at lower cost) elsewhere?

    And if "stupid money" was thrown at George (1 year, $1.5 million bonus, $660,000 base with incentive that could reach $4.5 million), do you think it would've been fair to offer Smith such a contract? Do you think Smith would've accepted such a contract?
     
  20. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,020
    Likes Received:
    2,616
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    OK the every single action was probably unfair. Don't recall you criticizing the Cowboys much around here, but hey you are pretty critical (attempted joke alert--well kind of) and probably do it elsewhere.

    The $4.5 was not entirely incentive based. $1.5 was in guaranteed signing bonus. Another 660k was in salary (for which there is a date after which the year's salary becomes guaranteed). So $2.16 mil was in essentially guaranteed money. No I do not know what the incentives were--I can hazard guesses as can you on 1000yds rushing 4.0 ypc or similar deals that George may have felt he had a chance of reaching. If you have a Cowboys capologist up there maybe you have a source to figure out if the bonuses were considered likely or unlikely to be earned.

    Link

    Like I said to LMBH, my thinking on this subject is definitely affected by the offer information I saw. As with anything, if the starting facts are wrong then the conclusion may be wrong. At this point, it is my impression Smith would have resigned with Dallas for even less than he did with Arizona--$3.75 mil per year--to stay a Cowboy and retire there. I think he wanted (a) to keep playing and (b) to get a decent, not elite, salary.
     

Share This Page