Cochran's offer withdrawn

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by barrett, Mar 11, 2009.

  1. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    According to the fella over at the examiner, the Texans have withdrawn their offer to Cochran thus making him an official free agent.

    http://www.examiner.com/x-778-Houst...0-Texans-withdraw-qualifying-offer-to-Cochran

    I'm somewhat disappointed by this. I feel like he was very productive when healthy. A big time "rotation guy". A positive to this is it says alot for both Bulman and Nading's developement. Also, I recognize that he could still be re-signed if no one picks him up. I would think that any team that saw his film would snatch him up though.
     
  2. dalemurphy

    dalemurphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,108
    Likes Received:
    661
    Location:
    Austin
    I'm not happy about this! maybe it's an injury issue or they think he'll sign for less? He's a pretty good player that would cost us relatively nothing to keep. THis is when I have a hard time with Kubiak. He clearly is upset with how Cochran handled his injury last year and now our roster has gotten worse. Meanwhile, we're still paying Studdard $500,000 to eat all the ice cream and tell cool stories about Vince Young's shower etiquette.
     
    Ole Miss Texan likes this.
  3. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,665
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    CPH
    On the other hand, if the Texans withdrew an offer it means that there was an offer out there, but that Cochran for reasons unknown decided not to take it.

    Too bad... bye bye...
     
  4. dalemurphy

    dalemurphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,108
    Likes Received:
    661
    Location:
    Austin
    It was his RFA tender. Those offers often sit there for weeks or even months while a contract extension is being negotiated. For instance, I doubt OD or R. Butler have signed their tenders yet either. It's not a rejection of the Texans' offer, it's just part of the RFA process.
     
  5. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,665
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    CPH
    Its wierd though, was the offer so bad that he would'nt even think about it?

    Speculation at best, but you have a point, it could have happened differently from what I suggest :)
     
  6. dalemurphy

    dalemurphy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,108
    Likes Received:
    661
    Location:
    Austin
    All low level RFA tenders are exactly the same: 1 yr, $1.01 million. That he didn't sign it is not an indication of Cochran desire/lack of desire to be in Houston. Normally, once tendered, players don't sign the tenders until weeks later or they never do because a contract extension gets worked out.
     
  7. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,665
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    CPH
    Gotya!
     
  8. Kaiser Toro

    Kaiser Toro Native Mod

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    16,179
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    Location:
    Straight Outta Austin
    Antonio Smith better be greater than (Weaver + Cochran) x 2.5, immediately.
     


  9. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,273
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    Kubiak mentioned concerns about Cochran before. He liked Cochran's effort but he kept on getting various injuries that would keep him off the field.

    You want your big fellows to be the guys that you don't have to worry that they will be on the field.
     
  10. cj5776

    cj5776 Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    10
    I wonder if the offer was given to him before Bush became DC and involved in who stays and who goes?
     
  11. keyser

    keyser Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,346
    Likes Received:
    207
    I'm hoping there is some untold story going on behind the scenes. Cochran looked pretty good to me, and would have come cheap. I'm amazed that they wouldn't even bring him to camp. I have to assume the coaches know what they're doing here, but it seems like a strange situation to me.
     
  12. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,710
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    all i can figure is they have enough confidence that he'll return for even less money or they really don't think he's worth their time. if that's the case then so be it. i hope it's the prior. i hope it's money checkers they are playing.
     
  13. dsorc

    dsorc Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    297
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    Houston
    This is really not a big loss. Why pay 1mill to a guy that at best will be your 4th option at DE. Smith is going to get more snaps than Weaver most likely, at least this year based on the monetary investment. Mario shouldn't be coming off the field that much. Bulman is better than Cochran and will be the primary backup for less money. McClover and Nading can be the 4th and 5th DEs for less money combined that Cochran and would probably give about the same production. We may also bring a vet min guy or a 2nd day draft pick to shore up the depth if needed. Also don't forget that Cochran is still rehabbing his foot injury so that also has to be in the FOs mind.
     
  14. Specnatz

    Specnatz Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Messages:
    8,620
    Likes Received:
    458
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    :mcnugget:

    Psst Weaver was released, so the odds are good that this happens.
     
  15. Polo

    Polo Guest

    Cochran was oft injured.

    If he was a guy that could stay on the field he would have value.
     
  16. wags

    wags Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    TX and FL
    Perhaps he means the #of snaps Smith plays this year will be greater than the # Weaver played last year??
     
  17. Polo

    Polo Guest

    I doubt it.
     
  18. Maddict5

    Maddict5 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    315

    i dont
     
  19. dsorc

    dsorc Veteran

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2008
    Messages:
    297
    Likes Received:
    40
    Location:
    Houston
    This is what I meant. Weaver played something like 2/3 of the snaps or less. More probably less. Bulman and Cochran were taking up a lot of snaps because Weaver sucked. I assume they'll let Smith grab more snaps and hope he earns his contract. But if he doesn't live up to expectation I expect Bulman to slowly creep into Smith's playing time.
     
  20. Malloy

    Malloy Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    5,665
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    CPH
    Get a room you two!
     

Share This Page