Chronic: Texans' Mathis eager to get on the field

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Texans34Life, May 28, 2007.

  1. Texans34Life

    Texans34Life I BLEED TEXANS!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Displaced in Cowboys Hell
    http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/4840515.html

     
    Texans Horror likes this.
  2. rmartin65

    rmartin65 I'm Score

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,000
    Likes Received:
    448
    Hopefully this will help people think that Mathis cares. He will play this year, and he will be good.
     
  3. kiwitexansfan

    kiwitexansfan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,544
    Likes Received:
    492
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    It is an interesting insight that he gives about being a track guy. I can totally understand that, and how that effects how he is perceived and carries himself.

    Hopefully that is history and he becomes a real team player.
     
  4. Runner

    Runner Hubcap Diamond Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    8,375
    Likes Received:
    658
    Maybe. The thing that kept him off the field last year was injury, not attitude.
     
  5. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    726
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    There's just way too many "if he can just stay healthy"'s.

    He hasn't recovered form the pulled hamstrings from last season. He has re-aggravated them during the OTAs. Any chance of him being "healthy" come training camp is, well . . .
     
  6. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,537
    Likes Received:
    923
    Location:
    Maryland
    "If healthy" he gives that homerun threat on kickoffs. The man was a monster on ST two years ago. Now all he has to do is catch the dang ball. No one in the league doubts his speed....."if healthy."
     
  7. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    1,070
    Hey I asked a question over at FanHouse and figured this would be worth having a discussion here about. Here's the complete link with the discussion parts of it:

    Texans FanHouse: Is Jerome Mathis Mr. Glass?

    Anyways, here's the question from the entry:

    What I'm interested in talking about is typically what do you think is (to borrow the corporate speak term for it) the "best practice" in the NFL as it relates to the return game? Having a designated person in that position? Or having someone that plays CB/WR/whatever too?
     
  8. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,537
    Likes Received:
    923
    Location:
    Maryland
    IMO - if he excels at one thing and is ok at another; why fix what isn't broken? If the roster spot is between a Probowl KR and an ok WR/KR why would you go with the so so guy?
     


  9. NitroGSXR

    NitroGSXR Super Sic #58

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    10,855
    Likes Received:
    995
    Location:
    Annapolis, MD
    I'll tell you what. I liked having a bright spot on the Texans in 2004 and Mathis was that bright spot and all he did was return kicks. He was so good that he turned heads towards the 'lowly' Texans in the national media and was rewarded with a starting Pro Bowl slot. We were represented in the national spotlight and that translates into a resounding yes to your 'corporate' question from me.

    Does it help the team? Anytime we can get some attention diverted our way at this point especially from prospective NFLers... absolutely.
     
  10. Rex King

    Rex King Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    405
    Likes Received:
    14
    I've changed my view a bit on this. If there were a hypothetical Healthy Mathis, that would be my guy. But because of his health issues, I think the trade-off is Mathis has to contribute more as both a receiver and returner to justify him missing some games during the season. To the other point, I'd be worried about an important position player having to deal with return duties as well. Divided attention, but increased injury risk as well. You gave Hall as an example. The Lions tried the same thing with Eddie Drummond, and it didn't work out well either - they ended up using him exclusively as a returner in the end.

    But how much does a 4th WR see the field anyway, aside from teams that use a lot of 3-wide sets like the Cards and Martz teams?
     
  11. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,428
    Likes Received:
    726
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    This pre-supposes that just because Kubiak is making him take reps at WR, that in itself is what's causing his hamstrings to tighten up. That is very misleading, and I disagree with it. How do you know Mathis didn't report out of shape? Being in top shape and proper stretching reduces hamstring pulls.

    I'm also incensed that some people want to criticize Kubiak for wanting to hold Mathis to the same standard as the rest of the players, and not pamper him, or give him some kind of special treatment, while at the same time, not question Mathis at all, as to why he can't stay healthy enough to stay on the field. A double standard? No???

    How do we know that it's not Mathis' fault in all this? And why can't Mathis play with little pain like Mario Williams did in every game last year?

    Me thinks that Mathis needs to man up and be a football player, and not act a prima donna track star. And that includes training like one, and stretching like one.
     
  12. HuttoKarl

    HuttoKarl Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2007
    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    141
    Of course he cares...he's about to lose a job if he doesn't show something. His gravy-training days are done. Results speak louder than words and Mathis can't afford to rely on his resume of one good season on special teams to keep his job.
     
  13. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,282
    Likes Received:
    1,070

    I am not criticizing Kubiak. I'm asking a question. Some teams have designated returners and some have their returners play other positions on the team. In the early years of the team, the Texans had a designated returner. Last year, Kubiak said he wanted position players to contribute on special teams and ST players contribute at positions. He specifically talked about working on making Mathis a receiver.

    I'm merely asking what the best NFL practice is relating to this. I don't really have an opinion on this other than knowing that last year's putting random position players returning kicks situation was unacceptable. Part of that was because Mathis was out, but also part of that was the desire to have a position player do the role of the returner so that is what they did.

    I don't know what sort of shape Mathis reported in, but what I do know is for a fact that it isn't just a matter of playing through pain. If you have a messed up hamstring, you are a hobbling mess. I never understood the extent of that until I tried to play through just a flag football season with a bad hamstring. Brain said go, and the leg said uh, no, we are not gonna go so good.

    As for stretching, we've had this discussion before on the MB. Nobody knows what prevents further hamstring pulls. There have been studies about stretching and there are no series of stretches that have been proven to prevent pulls. So just as we don't know if Mathis has been staying in shape, we also don't know whether he did everything the Texans asked of him and he is still having these problems. The biggest risk factors for hamstring problems is being fast and having a history of hamstring problems.

    Is this something that is chronic or can Mathis and the Texans find a way to get him through these problems? My question is about whether one way to get him on the field is to focus him in one area instead of trying to make him a really good backup receiver who isn't like going to see the field.

    I put that article out there about the difficulty of playing ST receiver and also a position on the field, and was just wondering out loud what the best way of doing things is.

    Does Devin Hester become a huge threat at WR this year learning a new position in the NFL, or does he get burnt out so that he can't do the return stuff so fast and is more average at everything?
     
  14. PapaL

    PapaL Loose Screw

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,537
    Likes Received:
    923
    Location:
    Maryland

    Umm because "speed" guy can't be a "speed" guy with one hamstring. He would just be a guy.
     
  15. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,482
    Likes Received:
    990
    I think in general you want a dual threat player returning kicks, whether at WR, RB, or CB. But, when you have a special player at that position, I think as a team, you need to be flexible enough to just let the guy return kicks. He can have a Devin Hester like impact if he can stay healthy. To me, Kubiak should basically forget about him as a real threat at WR, and have him return kicks. Every once in a while, stick him in to run a reverse or stretch the field on a post route or something. Having him pull a hammy on a pass route and losing him for 10 games isn't a good tradeoff imo.
     
  16. real

    real Guest

    Exactly...

    I saw it mentioned earlier in this thread, but what sense does it make to have a mediocre WR/KR that can do a little of both when you can have a player that specializes in one or the other...

    I doubt we'll see AJ returning punts anytime soon...It's always good to hae a couple players that can double up, but I think it's rather foolish to say that Mathis has to become a good WR when he has so much to offer on special teams...
     
  17. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Perhaps Kubiak would be content to leave Mathis as a special teams guy if he
    wasn't such a specialists ? After all he only returns kick-offs. If he also returned punts (as Hester does), it would make more sense not to tamper with him and not try to broaden his responsibilities ?
     
  18. ATX

    ATX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    9,563
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    Austin
    Maybe Kubiak needs to have Mathis start fielding punts then. I would think it would be an easier than having him learn the whole WR position.
     
  19. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,482
    Likes Received:
    990
    He tried punts before, and wasn't that good at it. PR guys tend to be quicker, shiftier, and usually have a smaller stature. KR tend to have more height/size and straight line footspeed. Some guys can do both, but many teams have a different PR and KR. In this case, putting Mathis at PR seems to be putting a square peg into a round hole, especially since they tried it, and it failed once.
     
  20. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Porky's right, some guys can do both while others only seem to have success at one or the other. Hester and "Phins top pick Ginn are a couple of examples of a player who is outstanding at both, while others like Reggie Bush
    don't seem to have the same versatility.
     

Share This Page