[Chronic] Coming in '09 for Texans: No Sage Rosenfels

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Texans34Life, Jan 1, 2009.

  1. Texans34Life

    Texans34Life I BLEED TEXANS!

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    52
    Location:
    Displaced in Cowboys Hell
    http://blogs.chron.com/jeromesolomon/2008/12/coming_in_09_for_texans_no_sag.html

     
  2. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,582
    Likes Received:
    1,679
    Location:
    Texas
    I'm not seeing the reason that Sage has to go.

    If he is worthless.. I mean if we won't get anything for him, then all the more reason to let him stay. I'm sure Kubiak was thinking we have an opportunity to get to the post season, if we have someone who can come off the bench and get results.. why go to the well for a former QB who will have to learn a system.

    All I want from my back-up, is the desire to be a starter, and the ability to do so. Once he's satisfied with being the back-up, it's time for him to go.

    Now if I were Sage, I'd want to stay, unless someone offered me a bonafied opportunity to compete for a starting job. Where is that going to happen?? Tennessee?? SF?? KC??

    Barring that, I'd stay in Texas, and wait for my opportunity to showcase what I could do in a system that works for me.
     
  3. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,257
    Likes Received:
    1,456
    I'm not, either (I'm agreeing with thunderkyss - a sure sign of the impending apocalypse). Sage doesn't hold the meager value he carried into last offseason. The Texans haven't developed a young QB to replace him. Sage isn't a starter, nor is he horrible. And he's still under contract.

    Sage is a backup NFL QB, and the Texans need a backup NFL QB. Oh, the "wisdom" of Solomon.
     
  4. Brando

    Brando Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    6,573
    Likes Received:
    571

    Agreed. It's also nice to have a back up capable of coming in and having your offense not skip a beat. I'm just afraid that the Rosencopter game might have hurt his confidence because he didn't seem like the same QB after that. It was like he had a concussion after that hit but I never heard if he had one or not. Although in the Baltimore game(his worst game as a Texan) he did go against one of the best defensive schemes in the NFL. To not bring him back would be a little silly to me. He is a quality back up and should be here for one more year.
     
  5. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    He'll be here next season...this is just the first of endless mindnumbing articles speculating on all sorts of weird roster moves this off season.
     
  6. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    Well, he wasn't the same after the Colts game.

    Couple that with how well Schaub played in the last part of the season? I think it's time to move Sage. Before the Colts game, there was a feeling that maybe Matt didn't have what it takes. I think Sage picked up on that. I think Sage was trying too hard to seal the deal (moving in for the goodnight kiss on the first date), and he was trying to capitalize off of Matt's absence.

    To keep Sage, IMO, would be silly. Even if he has to come into the game, whether it's reg season or playoffs, he's not in the same frame of mind anymore. A lot of piss and vinegar got taken out of him after the Colts game.

    It sucks that we refused a 3rd rounder. And, Sage would be starting for the Vikes right now...in a playoff game. I'm sure he's thinking about that. A lot of "what ifs" and "only ifs" and the best thing to do is move the guy.

    Maybe we could ship Sage, Greenwood, Reeves, and Weaver for a third. [/sarcasm]
     
  7. False Start

    False Start On # 69

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Location:
    Waiting For the Turning Point!
    That 3rd round pick would be real nice right about now.
     
    Sal Rosenberg likes this.
  8. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,471
    Likes Received:
    2,292

    I'm not saying that Solomon's mind isn't "numb" (because it is) but keeping Sage isn't a good idea IMO. He's crossed a line or a point if you will that has brought him to the place he is today which is basically "backup QB that you can't trust". When Kubiak decided he couldn't win with David Carr he moved quickly to ditch him and find someone he could win with. That someone wasn't Sage Rosenfels which tells us all something about what Kubiak thought of Sage. Now Rosenfels has proven that he can't be trusted to make good decisions when asked to step up and start. Hold on a second, check that. Sage has "confirmed beyond any doubt" that he can't be trusted to make good decisions.

    I think Kubiak is and has been looking to replace him. Sure he'll keep Sage if there is no reasonable alternative out there but he's looking for one. Jared Zabransky and Alex Brink were both "pet projects" of Kubiaks. I think he's trying to find a guy who he can coach up into that spot. He doesn't want to spend a lot of money on him or waste a first day draft pick on him but he's looking for a new backup QB. I think Sage's play this year probably added some urgency to that.

    Also, as has been pointed out by a couple of people up above this post Sage is now forever "Rosencopter". That isn't going to go away. That's him from now on and I have big doubts as to whether he could ever again crank out a run of games like he did in 2007. He's not the same player following that total humiliation in four minutes. He's changed clearly for the worse.
     
    Porky likes this.
  9. Texans_Chick

    Texans_Chick Utopian Dreamer

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2004
    Messages:
    7,273
    Likes Received:
    1,056
    McClain agrees in his chat, FWIW.

    I disagree with the premise of the article. Even if you got a third round pick for Sage, he did have value last season despite not being able to win like he did the year before.

    Here's the value:

    1. Not having to learn up a backup. There's only so many hours in a day for the coaches, so not having to spend time to learn up Quinn Gray or whomever had a value.

    2. They were able to carry only 2 QBs on the roster for a good portion of the season because they were good with Sage.

    3. Good lockerroom guy. Unlike some backups, like Quinn Gray for example. Yeah he wants to start but he wasn't going to make it hard on anyone.

    We will never know what the alternative history would be with Sage for a third round, but it doesn't seem to merit a told ya so blog post. But yeah, the offseason is long.....
     
  10. DBCooper

    DBCooper Outlaw

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Messages:
    4,208
    Likes Received:
    358
    Location:
    Winter Park, FL
    We need a capable backup QB.

    Schaub still gets hurt too often.
     
  11. dickieb

    dickieb Veteran

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2007
    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Not in Texas anymore :(
    I liked Boyd. I know we didn't see much of him - but what I did see was encouraging. Maybe they could bring him back into camp?
     
  12. LonerATO

    LonerATO Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,919
    Likes Received:
    89
    Location:
    No longer stuck in SA Town
    Good point of trying to find a QB that can be coached up, but by who? I think the person that will choose that QB will be Kyle and not Gary
     
  13. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,102
    Likes Received:
    1,819
    Location:
    Houston
    I liked what little I saw of Boyd also. If they can swing a 4th round pick for Sage, I wouldn't care if he left. The problem as others have mentioned, is having to get a good backup up to speed. If this did happen, and I don't think it will, there will probably be some aging QBs looking for a paycheck that we could pick up.
     
  14. Dread-Head

    Dread-Head Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    14,801
    Likes Received:
    1,177
    Location:
    Houston Texas baby!
    Sageregation now! Sageregation tomorrow! Sageregation FOREVER!
     
  15. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Dallas Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Dallas
    Glad you've come around :)

    Just like the Astros, the Texans are always a year late on getting top value for what assets they might have, Sorry I was one that was on board for getting the 3rd last off season. I know Sage is a professional but we all know he doesn't want to sit as a backup.
     
  16. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,209
    Likes Received:
    352
    Location:
    Austin
    I think there is a real value in having a QB that knows he's going to be a backup and is ok with that role. I think it's a real bonus that the guy might have starter experience or can start spot, but there should be a clear difference if a guy is starter material.

    Sage just hasn't been that guy whether it is bad luck or not learning to play within his abilities. I don't think it is a good idea to keep him around and I said when The Vikings offered the third for him we should've took it and laughed, however barring someone offering something for Sage I don't see us breaking contract unless someone good comes along.
     
  17. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,471
    Likes Received:
    2,292
    The thing that creeps me out about Sage is that "confidence" and "success" are kind of his two worst enemies. He plays safer when he's scared of screwing up. He's a guy who is going to say all the right things and try to be the player you need as a backup but in his heart he's wanting to be a starter and he's going to play like a guy trying to impress and audition for other teams.

    I do not want Sage on this team so technically I'm coming down as a hater. I know everybody says the right things but I can't imagine that there aren't some Texans players who know they'd be 9-7 if Sage hadn't pulled that crap against Indy. I saw how the team played for him later in the season and they didn't respond like last year when they rallied around him. He was different after he blew that game and the team was different towards him. We need to be working on his replacement right now. Backups with Rosenfels skills are a dime a dozen.
     
  18. mussop

    mussop Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2007
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    412
    Don't expect it to happen quickly, but before the Chronicle cranks it up again next season, they will have a new sports columnist.

    The Jarome Soloman Fan Club (both of em) might be upset, but this needs to happen, and the chrons editors should be smart enough to figure that out. (Or at least be smart enough to know the readers are usually right about these things.)

    Really, when are we going to get some real sports writers around here. All of the hacks at the Chron need to go with the exception of LZ. I say hire TC, Keith, Warren and a few others and the coverage will improve 110%.
     
  19. Hooston Texan

    Hooston Texan All Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2007
    Messages:
    654
    Likes Received:
    150
    A couple of thoughts on Sage.

    As a preliminary matter, Solomon's claim that Sage would sulk his way to uselessness if not given an opportunity to compete to start is hogwash. By all accounts I've read (except Solomon's fantasies), Sage's attitude has never been an issue.

    To me, the key game in Rosenfels' ill-fated 2008 campaign was not the Rosencopter but the Cleveland win. After the Indy debacle, he came back to play pretty well in Minnesota (the offense was more consistent in the second half than it was in the first with Schaub) aside from the dumb pick. He did well at Indy until the pick on the final drive, but, as with the Viking pick, we were trying to get back into the game. Baltimore's defense is, of course, top notch, and his flurry of picks (aside from the first one) all came with us significantly behind.

    Sage's undoing was Cleveland. He started out well, and the whole team, for once, looked really good. But then he did the unforgiveable--turned the ball over in the second half with his team leading. Twice. A good QB should almost never throw a pick in the second half when his team is ahead, and Sage did it twice against the Browns. The D completely bailed him out, but he lost the trust of his coaches at that point. The two Indy fumbles could no longer be excused as a freak occurrence (as if they could be before that).

    The next week against Jacksonville, he threw a pick on the second series (again, with a lead), and you could see Kubes throw the chains on him the rest of the way.

    That said, I have no problem with us keeping him if we cannot get good value for him. Unlike many teams (cough, Dallas, cough), our offense did not go inert when the backup QB played. But, I think we've missed the opportunity to maximize his value. Oh, well.
     
  20. Shaft75

    Shaft75 Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,090
    Likes Received:
    272
    Solomon knows that we got the next Tom Brady in the 7th round last year, but is just too hesitant to write it.

    This Solomon guy is a genius. I can only hope the Chron locks him up for 10 more years. It would only validate his drivel as top notch sports journalism.
     

Share This Page