Chris Palmer is too predictable.

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by footballguy69, Sep 13, 2004.

  1. footballguy69

    footballguy69 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Houston
    Chris Palmer is too predictable. The play calling is terrible. Only good thing Sunday was we spread the ball around to receivers. Defense should look into the mirror. Terrible pass rush from Deloach, Walker and Smith. More blitzs should be called especially on 3rd down and long. The defenses 3rd down allowance was horrible. We need Gary Kubiak as offensive coordinator and send Palmer somewhere else before he screws up Carr like he did Couch! And....BJ Symons will be the 2nd string QB next year. We need his quick reads and quick release. Ragone will be history!
     
  2. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    The Texans gained 336 yards even though they turned it over 4 times. If they had held on to the ball they would have easily eclipsed 400 yards of offense. What exactly do you want them to do? Playcalling had little to do with the melt down yesterday.
     
  3. footballguy69

    footballguy69 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Houston
    I am not real excited by 336 yards against last years worst defense! I still say our red zone calls are terrible1
     
  4. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    Ok, so let's break it down play by play:

    1st drive, what didn't you like, the Hollings run on 1st down at 12:47 or the two pass incompletions on 2nd and 3rd down that followed?

    Last years worst defense (in terms of yards allowed) was Atlanta - followed closely by a team near and dear.

    Count the times the Texans gained 336 yards last season, period. I'm guessing it happened once or twice.
     
  5. Meisterman

    Meisterman Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    4
    Its the timing of the play calls in the game that really hurt. The series in the 4th where the Texans went ...Baxter dump pass for 3, Baxter up the middle for nothing (and I heard alot of boos on that one), then Carr sack. Three and done. This is the Texans 4th quarter trend continuing from last year. That play calling series makes Mac Brown look like an X's and o's genius. JUST TERRIBLE.

    Bottom line is...Andre Johnson is our best offensive threat. He had one catch the whole second half. Is that good play calling?
     
  6. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    Agree, that was a horrible series. Play calling or execution? The Baxter pass on 1st down wasn't a bad call. The Baxter run on 2nd was. The Carr sack was a downfield attempt but Wade couldn't contain Phillips and Carr was trapped in the pocket.

    We don't know what plays were called (in terms of Carr's progressions and reads) but I think it's safe to say that if AJ was open, Carr would have found a way to get him the ball. They were rotating a safety over on AJ all day long.
     
  7. clandestin

    clandestin Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    6
    Don't know about you guys, but I sure wasn't predicting we'd only punt twice in that game.
     
  8. BuffSoldier

    BuffSoldier Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
    I wouldnt say he is pedictable, but I will say he has been too conservative going into the second half, yes we did have 336 yards in the game, but less than 100 yards came in the second half. If we can call plays in the second half like we do in the first, I think our offense could have at least 300 yards a game on a regular.
     
  9. Mistril48

    Mistril48 All Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Houston
    Capers clarified the 2nd down Baxter call on his radio show. He said that as part of the game plan, they were going to split Davis out. The first two times, the Chargers didn't 'cover' him and the play was successful (although Davis fumbled on one of the two calls). On this 2nd down, they called it for the third time, so Palmer and Capers expected a throw to Davis. When the Chargers rotated the coverage, the Texans had practiced the response of going up the middle with the FB. Of course, it was Baxter instead of Norris.

    I agree that it looked like bad play calling and I was livid. I think in fairness, I now understand that they were trying for a more dynamic play and that Carr correctly checked to a run where they had an advantage. Unfortunately, they didn't execute the run.

    To answer your question ... it was execution.
     
  10. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    Ok then, in the second half yesterday:

    Drive 1:
    Davis run
    Carr pass to Gaffney, 1st down.
    Davis run
    Carr - interception.

    Drive 2: 8 plays 52 yards Touchdown.

    No problem so far.....except for the turnover. Unless you see some bad play calls in there.

    Drive 3:
    Davis run
    Carr sacked (pass attempt)
    Carr flushed out of pocket - tackled short of 1st down.
    Two pass attempts - were they bad calls? Or was the Davis run on 1st down a bad call?

    Drive 4:
    We covered above

    Drive 5:
    Davis run
    Carr pass to Bradfordf for 1st down
    Davis fumble
    Bad calls where?

    Or is it execution? Or if it doesn't work, is it automatically a "bad call." :thumbup
     
  11. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    They went to the well too many times on that play. Once OK, twice maybe - if the first was a setup. But three times? Bad call - in terms of the fallback option if Davis isn't open - which he shouldn't be if they've already ran that play twice. It was one of the few among the 56 plays they ran that I would consider a bad play call because it didn't appear that the first option would have a high probablility of success.
     
  12. BuffSoldier

    BuffSoldier Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
    I never said "bad calls" I said conservative, and I distinctly remember them calling at least one rushing play to our Fb on a second down which you happened to leave out. Oh and less play action in the second half, why did we stop calling screens that worked so well with DD and Hollings, why did we stop throwing the quick outs to AJ and DD when they can do so much with the ball in their hands not to mention it worked well in the first half besides the fumble after a pretty good gain. What happened to the deep balls, I saw two in the first half. I never said bad calls or execution because we executed well in the second half, besides the turnover, because if you recall we only punted twice. Like I said not bad calls but conservativeness :thumbup
     
  13. Mistril48

    Mistril48 All Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Houston
    Yes 4th quarter, Baxter run
     
  14. Mistril48

    Mistril48 All Pro

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    548
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Houston
    I can't agree.

    If you call a play twice and it is successful, I see nothing wrong with calling it a third time, particularly if they the defense haven't adjusted to it yet. It was a situation where they were dictating to the defense. They shifted Davis, forcing the defense to adjust their interior defense. They felt they had an excellent chance to gain yardage against a soft middle, thereby cutting the yardage to a 3rd and short, if not a 1st down, after 3 yards on 1st down.

    I think the logic is fine, just not the execution. The O-line needs to beat on the D-line sometimes ... plus they'd work on it in practice as part of the game plan. If they get some yards on the play and then a 1st down, no one would have noticed the call.
     
  15. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    Didn't leave it out. It is covered above.

    Two of the four failed drives in the second half were cut short because of turnovers. That had as much or more to do with the dearth of yardage in the second half as conservative or bad play calling - or whatever name we want to give it.

    Are you on the FB Marshall varsity? If so, let me know your number since I will be in the stands on Thursday night.

    I have no problem with that but it wasn't successful both times. The first time they ran it (on the 1st and 20 in the 1st quarter) it failed miserably.
     
  16. texasguy346

    texasguy346 Mod Squad

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    7,105
    Likes Received:
    341
    Location:
    Deer Park, TX
    I can't speak for the playaction passing, but as far as the DD screens go the reason they were so successful is because Palmer called it when SD was in a full blitz. If you watch the tape you'll notice that the OLineman on the screen have no one to block. They called the two screens at an opurtune time, and SD adjusted accordingly after getting burned twice. I think AJ was SD's focus on defense much like Tomlinson was our focus. I wouldn't have minded seeing more 3 or 4 wideout sets, but the pressure was getting to Carr too quickly and that might be the reason for not using it as much. I felt Gaffney was doing well against them early on, and I thought it was a matchup we could exploit.
     
  17. BuffSoldier

    BuffSoldier Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
    Yes I am on the Thurgood Marshall varsity team, but I would rather not give you my # since I am a junior and will not be getting much PT(senior will be startin) lol. If I make a big play or two, I will post my # just to show off though. :hehe: Are you a Marshall fan or a Clear Brook fan?
     
  18. aj.

    aj. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,769
    Likes Received:
    347
    I follow Brook and will be making the trip over. Don't worry about the lack of pt, I'm sure your day will come. It looks like you guys have a pretty good passing game. I know you took care of Dulles. Looking forward to watching the game.
     
  19. Meisterman

    Meisterman Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2004
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    4
    In Regard to Baxter..this is the second string FB..coming off a season of rehab....who earlier in the game dropped a touchdown pass. The mere fact that he is doing anything more than blocking during crunch time in the 4th quarter is poor play selection "period".
     
  20. BuffSoldier

    BuffSoldier Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,929
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Tha South Side of Screwston, Texas
    Oh yeah, our passing game is really good, and alot of the players where kind of dissapointed that we didnt blow out Dulles by more, we could have played alot better , our running backs are good too but our zone o-line scheme is a liitle complicated and is confusing our linemen, we changed that to a different type of zone, we should run more effectively now. Our D didnt play up to their capabilities, but that is being fixed, hope you guys are ready because we have one heck of a squad here.
     

Share This Page