The only thing that you provided backed up what I said. That Chad Johnson had issues with their playbook and route adjustments. His issues there had nothing to do with his physical ability. Steve Smith was being shopped around before last year so obviously his own team thought he was slowing down. Hell, I provided facts showing that Chad had better years than him in both 2009 and 2010. You're the only one buying what you're selling honestly.
YOu got the facts wrong again. Steve Smith wanted out, because the franchise was in disarray. He somewhat dogged it the year before which does warrant criticism. He then got to know Cam Newton and they developed a relationship and Smith no longer wanted to be traded and he was immediately taken off the trading block. Carolina never wanted to let him go, but wasn't going to keep him around if he was going to be unhappy on a rebuilding team.
Chad Johnson's physical abilities declined several years ago. Hell even when he had 1,000 yards in 2010 he didn't look the same and looked to be in decline. Hell, I had the guy on my FF team that year and he helped me win a SB and I could tell he wasn't the same guy even in his last good season. In 2011 he was horrible which is exactly why a #2 WR that was older than him got better stats than him. His problems with the Patriots did have to do with not being able to grasp the system. Yes, that is true, but that was only part of it. Your problem is that you keep trying to pin point that as the only reason why he couldn't perform or stay on the field consistently. He had several BIG drops, he wasn't getting open nearly enough getting separation, and he couldn't even run the routes properly.
You can keep dancing around this issue all that you want, but you've got nothing here. A guy that has 3 out of 4 poor seasons at the age of 34 or whatever he is now doesn't equate to being a WR that hasn't been on the decline.
So because you lied and said I said something I didn't it's safe to say you're a liar then right? I'm not attacking you. Just stating facts.
No, it's not safe to say that.