Bob McNair: Texans won’t repeat mistakes we made with David Carr

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by CloakNNNdagger, Apr 27, 2014.

  1. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,152
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    I hope this is not just another campaign speech. The past dictates that the Texans have a pattern of REPEATING their mistakes.......far beyond the David Carr situation.


     
  2. IDEXAN

    IDEXAN Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,821
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    Houston
    “We weren’t able to give Carr the kind of protection we thought he should have,” McNair said. “I don’t put a lot of blame on him.”
    *****
    Is that an apology for screwing up David's career I'm hearing from McNair ? Maybe they are gonna take his little brother so they can make everything right with the Carr family ?
     
  3. Playoffs

    Playoffs Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    19,927
    Likes Received:
    1,180
    Because David isn't in this year's draft. :mail: :kitten:
     
  4. texanhead08

    texanhead08 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,440
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    Houston,Tx
    David isn't blameless in his lack of success, but the organization didn't exactly give him a chance to develop either. The lack of talent on the oline, bad offensive philosophy, and piss poor coaching played a role too.

    I remember Steve Mckinney saying that Chris Palmer had our WR's running option routes in 2002 and you already have a rookie QB with a bad expansion team oline and you are running these slow developing plays instead of routes to get the ball out of his hand fast.
     
    kingtexan likes this.
  5. TheRealJoker

    TheRealJoker Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,794
    Likes Received:
    272
    Location:
    Conroe
    Our OL would've looked a lot different had our bookend OTs not had injury issues.
     
  6. beerlover

    beerlover Site Contributor

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    12,983
    Likes Received:
    548
    Mario Williams wasn't exactly a resounding success either. The top DE since Peppers who they passed on the first time. Fast forward to 2014 does anyone doubt McNair & Company can repeat their mistakes again? seriously it could happen. here's a novel idea how about trading down, haven't tried that before so would not be repeating same mistake again :potkettle:
     
  7. TheMatrix31

    TheMatrix31 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2010
    Messages:
    8,203
    Likes Received:
    373
    Location:
    California
    I'd still rather have Mario Williams over the other options in 2006.
     
    thunderkyss likes this.
  8. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    Is there an expectation to win in the locker room?

    That's the question to me. If the Texans locker room does not expect to win in 2014, then nothing's changed & whether we take Mario Williams, or David Carr, it won't make a difference.

    If they're looking for a QB to give them a chance to win, or their #1 pick to be our defense, we're going down the same road. & unless we get a real special player, there's no way he can live up to that kind of 1-1 expectations.
     


  9. Texian

    Texian Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,224
    Likes Received:
    155
    Sounds like old Bob is doing a little retracting from his December comments, "We are NOT rebuilding, we're a playoff team", statement.

    I think there is no coincidence at all that the day after Blake Bortles Pro Day, the Texans signed QB Ryan Fitzpatrick. A veteran with 68 career starts in the NFL. Bob's 4/27 comments and the signing of Fitz go hand in hand. Drafting Bortles is kind of a NO brainer and don't expect to see Blake until the 2nd half of the season at the earliest.
     
  10. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    double post
     
  11. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    Help me connect the dots.

    How is it not rebuilding if we're not going to make the same mistakes we made with Carr?

    How does signing Fitzpatrick a day after Bortles pro day point to drafting Bortles?

    Why won't Bortles (or whoever our newest QB will be) not start until the 2nd half of the season? This one puzzles me the most. If it's a protection issue (like Bob says in the article, but I never believed it was a protection issue) what if we have it fixed before we start the season?

    What if Borltes proves to give us a better chance to beat Washington (who's going through their own struggles), should we start Fitzpatrick because we paid him "so" much?

    What if we're 0-6 thanks to spotty QB play & Bortles is the only healthy QB we have on the roster?
     
  12. Texian

    Texian Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,224
    Likes Received:
    155
    Maybe then....
     
  13. Playoffs

    Playoffs Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Messages:
    19,927
    Likes Received:
    1,180
    Blameful, imo.

    In 2006, the team took 43 sacks total, 41 on Carr (a 5 year starter).

    In 2007, the team took 22 sacks total on 60 more attempts.

    We added Jordan Black and lost Zach Wiegert (OTs), and our first 4 draft picks were Amobi Okoye, Jacoby Jones, Fred Bennett, and Brandon Harrison.

    So was it the offensive line, or was it the QB (Schaub/Rosenfels vs Carr)?

    In 2007, Carr took 13 sacks in just 136 attempts for Carolina, a ~10% sack rate. Transposing to 2007 Texans attempts, that would've been 51 sacks.

    You'd better draft pocket presence, because its darned near impossible to teach at this level.
     
  14. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    I saw your replies... didn't see any answers.

    Just because we don't repeat the mistakes made with Carr does not mean we are rebuilding.

    Signing Fitzpatrick the day after Bortles pro day does not in any way signal we're taking Bortles over any other QB in this draft.

    Our rookie QB will start day 1 if he's ready. Just because Carr wasn't, doesn't mean that Bortles (or whoever we draft) won't be. Three years later, Carr wasn't ready to start, doesn't mean our new QB won't start for three years.
     
  15. IDEXAN

    IDEXAN Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2010
    Messages:
    8,821
    Likes Received:
    225
    Location:
    Houston
    But how can you say that when the free agents market rewarded him with the top dollar contract of any defensive player ever at that point in time ? The NFL ultimately is a business, and the market spoke loud and clear about Mario's value when his services became available.
     
    Nitrofish likes this.
  16. CloakNNNdagger

    CloakNNNdagger Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    17,152
    Likes Received:
    1,413
    A specific market known for its spoiled goods. I find it very difficult to have listened to a rudderless voice coming out of the wilderness...........the wilderness known as Buffalo. I suspect the Jills have most likely been making most of their important decisions over the years............Now that the Jills are no longer in existence, what will they do?........what will they do?:thinking:
     
    disaacks3 likes this.
  17. Texian

    Texian Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,224
    Likes Received:
    155
    I'm just going with what Bob said this week, unlike Carr, a Texans rookie QB today, would sit and learn, behind a vet QB. Pretty easy to understand if you ask me.
     
  18. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    If that's what you said, we would have a different set of questions (as I don't believe that's what McNair said).


    But you said that we're rebuilding because we don't want to make the same mistakes we made with Carr.

    I'm asking how you connect the two totally irrelevant happenstances.

    You said signing Fitzpatrick points to us drafting Bortles...... again two ideas I'd like to understand how you connect.

    You said since we're not going to start our young QB until we're able to protect our young QB means our newest QB won't start until some time after the midway point of the season. I'm asking what if we can protect him as early as week 1, or week 2, or week 5, or any time before week 8?
     
  19. Texian

    Texian Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    4,224
    Likes Received:
    155
    Did you not read post #1 and what Bob said in the interview this week with Michael David Smith? If not, return to go and read post 1.
     
  20. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas

    All this tells me, is that McNair admits that David was not ready. Has absolutely no bearing on whether our next rookie QB is ready or not. However, if he is not ready this statement suggests he will not start.




    This is still talking about David Carr. It only pertains to our next QB if he is not ready. If he is ready & the team is good enough to support him it is possible that he'll start like Russell Wilson did, or Andrew Luck, or Matthew Stafford.




    This is where the reporter strays from reporting the news & adds his own commentary. However, McNair's comments do not suggest what he believes at all. They may be drafting him with the idea that he will compete for the starting job. McNair's comments about David Carr have nothing to do with the Texans "ideas" about a new QB, Fitzpatrick, Keenum, or Tj.

    If McNair's comments suggests wanting a strong offensive line, that could also have draft implications.


    That last statement, the one that starts with "if" also suggests the possibility that the Texans won't draft a QB in the 2014 draft at all. After all, the Texans have not had much success drafting QBs period. But have had success with QBs they've traded for or signing veteran QBs.
     

Share This Page