Best conference in 2008?

Discussion in 'College Football & the NFL Draft' started by TexanSam, Aug 8, 2008.

  1. TexanSam

    TexanSam Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2005
    Messages:
    17,071
    Likes Received:
    713
    Which do you think is the best conference in 2008? Not over time, but this year. It could be a little early to truly say which one is best, but from a preseason perspective what do you guys think?

    IMO, it's between the SEC and Big 12.

    The SEC has 4 teams in the Top 11, but the Big 12 has 5 teams in the Top 15.
     
  2. YoungTexanFan

    YoungTexanFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    4,802
    Likes Received:
    134
    It depends on if you want offense or defense. The Big 12 will give you firepower, while the SEC will typically give you defense. The Big 12 does have some very good defensive schools like OU and KU, but the SEC also has some good offenses that can keep up with just about anyone.
     
  3. Ole Miss Texan

    Ole Miss Texan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 8, 2006
    Messages:
    8,694
    Likes Received:
    685
    Tough to say. I look at it like this:

    If I was a coach of my own team do I think I would be able to win more games playing in the Big XII or the SEC. Answer: BIG XII

    If I was out of conference and had to get randomly paired with a non-conference game against either the Big XII or SEC, which one would I rather play? Answer: Big XII

    Therefore, I think the SEC is still the better conference. But that's not saying the Big XII is weak by anymeans... I think they are closer now in competition level than in years past.
     
  4. TexansLucky13

    TexansLucky13 53d Signal Batt

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    4,783
    Likes Received:
    295
    Location:
    Maryland
    SEC > Big 12 > Everyone else
     
  5. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    I dunno that much about college football, so here's my question: is it really the consensus now that its SEC & Big 12 one & two, respectively, and everyone else follows them ? I guess I was under the impression that the Big 12 was not thought to be superior to the PAC10 or Big 10 or ACC ?
     
  6. awtysst

    awtysst Draft Guru

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    7,611
    Likes Received:
    497
    I would say the consenus is that The SEC is the best football conference in the nation. Then it gets murky. Some people point to the Pac 10, but aside from USC the Pac 10 has been iffy the last decade. Some say the Big 10, but outside of Ohio State and Michigan, the rest is pretty average. The Big East is a group of relatively average teams. Therefore I say the Big XII. Oklahoma, Texas, Missou, Kansas, Texas Tech, and A&M are all solid teams. Many times there are 2 Big XII teams in the BCS games, so that says a lot in my mind.
     
  7. YoungTexanFan

    YoungTexanFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2004
    Messages:
    4,802
    Likes Received:
    134
    The SEC is the most respected conference and is usually the best. I love SEC atmosphere. Huge stadiums with HUGE following and traditions. What I don't like about SEC teams is that they sell virtually all of their seats to alumni and the students have a hard time getting into games at their school. Prime example: LSU.

    The Big 10 has Ohio St. and Michigan, but recently they haven't both been good at the same time. They have had a year or two like that, but in general, no. Also, there is little parity within the conference. Occasionally a team like Wisconsin can get into the top 25, but the conference as a whole is usually lack-luster and the Big 10 style of football is also very boring to follow for most fans. (They don't have the top defenses of the SEC or the elite offenses like the Big 12/Pac 100

    The Pac 10 essentially starts and ends with USC. They are an elite team, but the conference lacks a second power. Every year a team will establish itself as the #2 team, but there is hardly ever a Pac 10 team in a BCS that isn't USC.

    The Big East...They are in no way a top conference. The weakest out of the "Big 6". Upstart South Florida (who KU has away this year :gun: ) is a good looking team, but how many Connecticut's from last year can there be? West Virginia is the class of the conference.

    The Big 12 has two traditional power schools in Oklahoma and Texas. They are both BCS caliber teams in any given year. Teams like Texas Tech, Missouri, Kansas, and Texas A&M provide teams that can play with almost every team from other conferences. The Big 12 is stacked at the top but also provides very solid middle group. Kansas and Missouri are being considered "middle group" because it is mostly a recent success for both teams, but they both look poised to stay in the top 25.

    I'm actually a very big fan of the ACC. I LOVE Miami and except for when they play KU, I LOVE the VT defense. However, the ACC has some lower tier schools that drag the conference down as a whole, but schools like Virginia help keep a nice balance in the middle and will occasionally challenge top teams in the conference.
     
  8. Dan B.

    Dan B. Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Messages:
    6,785
    Likes Received:
    696
    Location:
    by the construction
    Considering the question is the best in 2008, I would have to say that the Big East is getting kind of shafted here. The conference has been improving by leaps and bounds, with Rutgers, USF, and even UConn basically starting programs from scratch, but investing millions in quality coaches and brand new stadia, helping them to make huge strides. Then there is Cincinnatti which is definitely on the rise as well, and Syracuse which hasn't been as good of late but is still a decent football school. Louisville and the aforementioned WVU are consistently top 25 schools also. They are fortunate in that most of their schools are in major cities or media markets, which helps a lot with recruiting. Especially after VT and Miami left the Big East was supposed to crater, but IMHO it has held up quite well and may even be better than the ACC or PAC 10 now -- but I think the PAC 10 is incredibly overrated. This is not to say that the Big East is anywhere close to the elite conferences, especially the SEC, which is basically a pro league. No conference comes anywhere close to the SEC from top to bottom. There are basically 10 elite programs in the SEC, with only Kentucky and Vandy failing to be a threat for a 10 win BCS season in a given year. The Big 12 is probably second in my view, because the Big 10 seems to fail in bowl games every year. I think this is because Big 10 teams tend to be built for their hometowns, which are cold weather cities where a team has to run, run, and run some more, then have a solid defense to compete. In bowl games played in Florida or sunnier climes, tricky offenses tend to pick them apart.


    Basically I would rank them like this:

    SEC
    --
    --
    Big 12
    Big 10
    --
    --
    Pac 10/ACC/Big East
    --
    --
    --
    WAC/Mountain West/CUSA

    A bit of info on the Big East in recent years:
     


Share This Page