Bears Game Easy? Nope, More Cover 2

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by TEXANS84, Dec 14, 2004.

  1. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,479
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    From this mornings Chronicle:

    Hopefully the Texans can figure out some way to breakdown the Cover 2, otherwise we may be in for a long day again.

    Side note: Brian Urlacher underwent an MRI today...no word yet.
     
  2. wags

    wags Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    28
    Location:
    TX and FL
    Urlacher probably won't play. :whoohoo: I think Lovie runs the Tampa Cover 2 because he used to be the linebackers coach there.
     
  3. pek281

    pek281 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Houston
    Ugh, I didn't like reading that this morning either.

    Their O-Line is really banged up though. It would be nice to see our front four get a legitimate rush on the QB.
     
  4. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,469
    Likes Received:
    2,290
    Good. More Cover 2 is a good thing. I hope every team we play for the next three years runs it and runs it well.

    There you go David, figure it out OR BE DESTROYED!

    Seriously though he's got to learn how to beat it sooner or later.
     
  5. WWJD

    WWJD Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,260
    Likes Received:
    139
    Look at it this way. If the Cowboys can beat the Bears the Texans certainly can. So they should. One more week to prepare for this cover 2 mess and Chad Hutchison at QB?? We should win by at least a TD.
     
  6. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Passing Defense - Passing Yards/Game
    Team G Att Att/G Cmp Pct Yds Yds/G TDs Int Sck SckYds
    Tampa Bay 13 355 27.3 198 55.8 2125 163.5 15 15 37 220
    Miami 13 362 27.8 203 56.1 2151 165.5 15 9 32 190
    Buffalo 13 409 31.5 224 54.8 2293 176.4 18 17 38 270
    Washington 13 394 30.3 224 56.9 2293 176.4 12 13 30 190
    Pittsburgh 13 399 30.7 219 54.9 2305 177.3 12 16 38 207
    New York (N) 13 375 28.8 230 61.3 2331 179.3 23 10 31 206
    Baltimore 13 410 31.5 225 54.9 2404 184.9 10 17 36 248
    New York (A) 13 393 30.2 217 55.2 2435 187.3 14 16 29 182
    Denver 13 407 31.3 226 55.5 2439 187.6 12 10 28 197
    Cleveland 13 383 29.5 232 60.6 2552 196.3 14 15 23 148
    Arizona 13 411 31.6 228 55.5 2560 196.9 17 11 29 164
    Chicago 13 430 33.1 243 56.5 2649 203.8 19 16 31 151
    Philadelphia 13 467 35.9 282 60.4 2685 206.5 13 15 42 229
    St. Louis 13 399 30.7 241 60.4 2685 206.5 20 6 25 180
    Cincinnati 13 399 30.7 248 62.2 2688 206.8 21 16 30 201
    Jacksonville 13 395 30.4 248 62.8 2759 212.2 15 8 29 175
    New England 13 438 33.7 253 57.8 2805 215.8 15 18 37 267
    Tennessee 13 412 31.7 258 62.6 2815 216.5 20 15 28 192
    Detroit 13 432 33.2 265 61.3 2822 217.1 24 13 31 179
    San Francisco 13 393 30.2 244 62.1 2831 217.8 22 8 26 183
    Atlanta 13 431 33.2 271 62.9 2833 217.9 14 15 36 247
    Carolina 13 420 32.3 248 59.0 2855 219.6 12 22 25 154
    Seattle 13 473 36.4 281 59.4 2967 228.2 16 20 29 172
    Oakland 13 376 28.9 228 60.6 2975 228.8 24 6 17 132
    Minnesota 13 431 33.2 266 61.7 2987 229.8 23 7 33 201
    Dallas 13 411 31.6 253 61.6 3027 232.8 26 8 28 166
    Green Bay 13 446 34.3 269 60.3 3127 240.5 28 7 30 214
    Indianapolis 13 456 35.1 307 67.3 3178
    Houston 13 445 34.2 297 66.7 3208 246.8 31 17 18 118
    San Diego 13 482 37.1 301 62.4 3215 247.3 16 17 24 116
    New Orleans 13 432 33.2 270 62.5 3326 255.8 21 10 27 156
    Kansas City 13 413 31.8 253 61.3 3515 270.4 27 9 32 197

    http://www.nfl.com/stats/teamsort/NFL/DEF-PASSING/2004/regular?sort_col_1=8&_1:col_1=7
     
  7. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,479
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    Well, the Cowboys and Jags can beat the Bears.....but the Bears also beat the Vikings and the Packers.
    Also factor this in from the NOAA weather center:
    So, this will be interesting.
     
  8. infantrycak

    infantrycak Lead Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    53,960
    Likes Received:
    2,450
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    True Vinny, as far as those stats go, but a lot of the yards on Indy are desparation yards because they have taken teams out of the game plan. Chicago on the other hand is only averaging 15.3 pts per game. This team is the opposite of the Colts (cover 2 aside) reasonably strong D (weakened by the loss of Urlacher)--17th on yards (336.5ypg), 12th on scoring (19.8ppg) and passing (203.8) and 24th on rushing (132.8)--with a horrible O--31st in the league for yards (241.4 ypg), scoring (15.3 ppg), passing (138.6) and 23rd on rushing (102.8).

    As an aside, the Bears have given up 5 sacks each of the last 2 weeks. Time for the OLB's to step up.
     
  9. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,479
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    Thanks for finding that Vinny....I was looking for that.

    Its pretty sad that we have allowed 600 more passing yards than the Bears, and over a 1000 more than the leauge leading Bucs.
     
  10. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    I see Davis having a big day while the Bears keep a safety over Johnson and we throw our obligatory ONE TD pass 2 INT's and get possibly one rushing TD. We are one of the worst road teams in the NFL. The most we scored on the road this year is 24 points but we had a defensive score in that game.
     
  11. Marcus

    Marcus Ruthless pragmatist

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    8,212
    Likes Received:
    632
    Location:
    Stafford, Texas
    Here's my take on why the Cover 2 is such a pain in the *****.

    Basically, (as if I knew what I'm talking about) the Cover 2 puts the 2 safeties in deep zones on both sides of the field, essentially double covering both outside receivers, while dropping back a linebacker or another DB to cover the middle. So you'd think that by sending a TE or another WR over the middle, you'd get isolation one on one.

    But the problem, and the reason that the Cover 2 so very effective against the Texans offense, is that the opposing teams are successful in getting pressure on Carr using only a 4-man rush. They don't ever need to blitz. They don't ever need to rush 5. The 4 down linemen get the job done. Not ONLY that, but past games have shown that it takes Davis and an extra TE to help the OL give Carr enough Carr time to throw.

    So that leaves what? 3 people running out for a pass against 7 people in coverage. Yeah, that'll work. All freakin day long. :loser

    So, when you talk about Carr "not figuring out" the Cover 2, I think it would help if some people gave him a little time to "figure it out".

    Capers said on his radio show on Monday night that the downfield passing game was "not our strength right now", and commented more than once about containing the 4 man rush.

    So when you watch the Bears game on Sunday, if the Bears 4-man front harrasses Carr without any help, it will be another long day.
     
  12. Chance_C

    Chance_C Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Livingston Texas
    If our line can give Carr time to unload the ball, AJ can beat the double coverage. How about (and I know this has been hashed and rehashed) bringing Miller in with Bruener in a two tight end set. Miller can get open against most LB's. I just hope Carr is given enough time this Sunday to bust the cover 2.
     
  13. the wonger need food

    the wonger need food Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2004
    Messages:
    2,562
    Likes Received:
    122
    Location:
    Houston
    Completing passes against a Cover 2 defense might as well be trying to figure out the space-time continuum for this coaching staff.
     
  14. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,469
    Likes Received:
    2,290
    You misspelled "quarterback".
     
  15. AndreJ

    AndreJ All Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2004
    Messages:
    934
    Likes Received:
    1
    You all may think this is really stupid, but something just dawned on me. When teams play cover 2 Davis has better games and when they dont they commit to the run and Carr/AJ have big games. If we could figure out how to do both no matter what defense the teams are running i think our offense will be set.

    Excuse me stupidity but i just realized that. :hmmm:
     
  16. Vinny

    Vinny shiny happy fan Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    21,847
    Likes Received:
    1,513
    Fiddy only has 2000 posts on this. ;)
     
  17. Texas_Heat

    Texas_Heat Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    IN TEXAN HELL
    Chicago has won six straight December home games at Soldier Field dating back to 2000.
     
  18. I can't understand for the life of me why we don't run motions to overload one side, this helps in creating confusion in the cover 2 and if they remain in a zone one side is of the field has more recievers open. Can anyone explain to me why we are not motioning? Why we are not using the TE's? Why we never run the fullback?
     
  19. Porky

    Porky Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    Messages:
    12,439
    Likes Received:
    984
    All good questions with no answers. Although I think it might have something to do with the space-time continuum. :hmmm:
     
  20. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,255
    Likes Received:
    1,455
    I'll take a stab at the Supergenius' questions:

    1) I don't know why the Texans don't include more motion from the wideouts. The only reason I can think of is that you want to keep a CB on the edge if it's a run play so he can't help out. Really, I got nothing.

    2) Bruener can't catch & Miller can't uncover anymore. The bulking up of Miller has been a mistake.

    3) Moran Norris & Jarrod Baxter are terrible runners. Now if the Texans picked up a more versatile FB (and I think they should), this would be a more appropriate question
     

Share This Page