Arizona to host 2015 Super Bowl

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by J_R, Oct 11, 2011.

  1. J_R

    J_R Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,645
    Likes Received:
    159
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/10/11/super-bowl-will-be-played-in-arizona-in-2015/
     
  2. imatexan

    imatexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,791
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Why is Houston not in the mix?

    We did great on the national stage last superbowl and still have a new stadium.

    Hmm...
     
  3. hobie

    hobie Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,241
    Likes Received:
    282
    Why you ask.. well first off, Houston was given the Superbowl when the team was awarded here and the stadium was built. Most all new venues now are getting the same deal. The league does that, it is not voted on by the owners. Second is that in my opinion, Houston is a BIG market team, one of a few, and that when it comes to the revenue portion of things, they don't want to share the wealth to the smaller market teams. When it comes time to vote on a location, the smaller market teams have the numbers to vote on what market they want the SB to be in. Not always the best bid that wins it. If that were so, I am sure Houston and Dallas would have had more opportunities to host SB then they have.
     
  4. paycheck71

    paycheck71 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    1,467
    Likes Received:
    131
    Location:
    Salt Lake City
    If the SB comes back to TX, I'm almost sure it'll be in Arlington again. They can sell 30K more seats up there, and if you assume that the average SB ticket is $1500 (correct me if I'm wrong here), that's $45M. I don't see the league leaving that kind of money on the table when sending the SB to TX again.
     
  5. DX-TEX

    DX-TEX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    3,110
    Likes Received:
    378
    2014 in New York is the dumbest idea EVER! Superbowl, in NY in freaking early February, in an OPEN AIR STADIUM?

    HA!
     
  6. GuerillaBlack

    GuerillaBlack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    9,216
    Likes Received:
    622
    Location:
    Montrose
    Not so sure about that. The events in North Texas were way too spread out since every city up here wanted a piece of the pie. Even without the ice, it would have been bad. At least Houston had everything centralized in and around the Loop. DFW's Super Bowl was a disaster.
     
  7. HoustonFrog

    HoustonFrog Chitown Frog

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    12,421
    Likes Received:
    785
    Location:
    Chicago
    I disagree with this assessment just because your take on Houston is dead wrong. The main complaint of EVERY media and outside presence here was the way Houston was set up and spread out. They may have had the main people downtown but most people were put out off of 59 and way out and it took them hours daily to get to where they had to go. Houston will never get another SB because people just don't like going there and it isn't a good set up no matter how well it was pulled off. I thought that week was awesome but I heard nothing but complaints. DFW had alot of issues but people still like JerryWorld and it will get in the mix again. Overall there should only be a rotation of Miami and San Diego. Good weather and outdoors. I know people love NO but I hate seeing SBs on TV played in domes.
     

Share This Page