an interesting stat

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by F-minus67, Feb 1, 2005.

  1. F-minus67

    F-minus67 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Middletown,CT
    I was just watching ESPN news and in showed a screen about how the Pats LBs have the most sacks by any core in the league. And to my suprise the texans were fifth in the league with something like 14.4 sacks. Which makes me wonder, along with the 20 something picks by the secondary and LBs, what does this defense need the most?
     
  2. TexansTrueFan

    TexansTrueFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Huntsville Tx
    problably some defensive line men who can actually get a lil push up the middle and pressure the QB !
     
  3. Sarg01

    Sarg01 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    1,152
    Likes Received:
    37
    If this is saying the Texans LBs have the 5th most sacks among NFL LBs, that's not that surprising. How many teams run the 3-4, in which sacks are as much on the LBs as on the line?
     
  4. nunusguy

    nunusguy Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,991
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Houston
    Right. For relavance, stick with apples to apples; how do we compare with
    the other 3-4 Ds ? Not very impressive on that basis, 'cause from that view we're near the bottom.
     
  5. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    The LBs really arent the problem... our LB core is solid. We need a more dominant Dline.
     
  6. D-ReK

    D-ReK RAWWWRR!

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    3,406
    Likes Received:
    99
    Location:
    Avalon
    We already have a decent LB corp, the only person I'd replace is Foreman...

    To me, it would be more important to get some younger D-Lineman that could handle the O-Line and allow our LBs to get clean shots on the QB...
     
  7. brickmantexanfan

    brickmantexanfan Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    169
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kansas
    A stronger more effective Line
     
  8. F-minus67

    F-minus67 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Middletown,CT
    the chart I saw showed the Pats(1), Steelers(2) and Chargers(4) in that order in front of the Texans.
     


  9. keyfro

    keyfro Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,859
    Likes Received:
    37
    totally agree we need more dominant d-lineman...i think smith could fill the need at NT for us...we need to draft a strong, QUICK, d-lineman for the end spot...spears or shaun cody fits that bill the best
     
  10. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    I dunno about quick.. big and strong are my main wants.. someone who can put pressure on the QB.. but he doesnt have to be a sack machine. All he has to do is be big enough to plug holes, strong enough to push back the Oline.. and as far as speed goes.. if he is quick enough and skilled enough that he requires a double team.. he would be perfect.

    His job is to free up the OLBs and stop the run.. if he gets a little pressure on the QB.. that is just extra.
     
  11. rittenhouserobz

    rittenhouserobz Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    1,100
    Likes Received:
    5
    Another interesting stat to check. Rushin TD's allowed by the defense. We had very few rushing TD's while allowing a high number of passing TD's. I think this reflects a DL that is reading the plays more and reacting less. I would like to see our 3 DL starters disrupt the QB's path more often. They don't need sacks, but they should be altering the QB's plan and pushing the QB toward a blitzing LB.

    The sacks by the LB's is only valuable when comparing 3-4 defenses as it was already noted.
     
  12. Honoring Earl 34

    Honoring Earl 34 Hey Koolaid

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    19,770
    Likes Received:
    1,334
    Location:
    Houston
    :howdy: If you have DL who are strong enough at the point of attack and quick enough to disrupt you have to double team him. The more play makers the more offense starts thinking and having to adjust . They are then playing on their heels. A 300 lb DE is a big DE . Spears and Cody are Both around 300 lbs . They both seem athletic . My thought would be a tall DE ( 6 ft 6 in - 6 ft 7 in )about 320 lbs would be perfect .
     
  13. TexansTrueFan

    TexansTrueFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2004
    Messages:
    2,600
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    Huntsville Tx
    some good strong DL and we have a pretty good defense, until then our pass coverage will suffer as well.
     

Share This Page