Here is my only point. Okay, for the sake of arguement lets say that bush is a perfect fit for denvers running scheme. he puts up a fantastically dynamite year. Why wouldnt we continue the "denver pattern" and trade him away for somebody else and then get another back. Clinton portis was a stud, they traded him for a CB. Reuben Droughns was a beast, now he is a cleveland brown...i think everybody assumes we would keep Bush for a while...but history has shown that not to be the case. Do you want bush, even if its only for a couple of years?