Alan Faneca signs with.....

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by texanfan2002114, Apr 27, 2010.

  1. texanfan2002114

    texanfan2002114 Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    1,097
    Likes Received:
    71
    Location:
    On the front row in the endzone!!!
    The Arizona Cardinals for a one year deal worth $2.5 million. Per Adam Schefter

    "Adam_Schefter One other note on Pro Bowl guard Alan Faneca's $2.5 million deal with Arizona - it's fully guaranteed. 3 minutes ago via UberTwitter"


    "Adam_Schefter Filed to ESPN: Pro Bowl guard Alan Faneca reached agreement with Arizona on a one-year, $2.5 million deal. Nice pickup for the Cardinals.
    7 minutes ago via UberTwitter"
     
  2. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    353
    Location:
    Austin
    Thought this was an outside possibility being reunited with Russ Grim.

    All things considered that's an easy contract to take. Wonder what or if the FO offered him anything.
     
  3. Ryan

    Ryan THIS YEAR

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    285
    Location:
    Beaumont,Tx
    I want Sharper more. But i have a feeling we won't make a move either. We would've pursued him early if we were really interested.
     
  4. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    813
    Location:
    In Transit
    We may have persued him. He may have not given us a chance. We just don't know.
     
  5. BIG TORO

    BIG TORO TERADACTYL #23

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2009
    Messages:
    3,729
    Likes Received:
    310
    Location:
    Sugar Land, TX
    Can anyone tell me why we cant come to terms and sign anyone? Are we that cheap, I mean we have a good team and a coach that most players like what is the deal?
     
  6. Lucky

    Lucky Moderator

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    14,296
    Likes Received:
    1,481
    Part of me wants to say that Kubiak & Smith don't want veterans who might challenge authority. But, I think the real reason is that the Texans are so locked into their system, they refuse to bring in anyone that's not a perfect fit. Or, they could just think the guys that are available have nothing left. Maybe some combination of these reasons.

    Whatever it is, not bringing in vets and going with young players is not an excuse for mediocrity. If someone suggests that the Texans are the youngest team in the league (which is a crock), just say "So what?". Smithiak made a conscious decision to go young and stay young. They don't deserve a get out of jail free card for building a young team.
     
    eriadoc likes this.
  7. ArlingtonTexan

    ArlingtonTexan Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    465
    Of all the possible issues with the current administration, this is the one that I think bothers me the most. Teams need a system and philosophy, but the Texans seem to have less flexibility in their way of thinking about players and adjustments than most of the league. I mean I don't want them to turn into the Raiders or pre-Shanny Redskins where they just sign names because they are names, but why is it that a name brand player is NEVER a fit what we do?
     
  8. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,264
    Likes Received:
    1,546
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Ahman Green and Eric Moulds were name brand players. Roosevelt Colvin was a name brand player. Who was the Bucc we brought in last year at LB that didn't make the team? He had a name (even though I don't remember it at the moment.)

    We'll never know how many we've gone after and missed (like Bodden.)

    And I don't think we're that different from most teams. There are a few teams that always seem to get the big name guys (like the Jets and the Redskins and the Giants and the Cowboys) but it's because those are name franchises. We're not a name franchise. It will take several years of being a winner before we are.
     


  9. sometexansfan

    sometexansfan Blue Bomber

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    277
    Likes Received:
    17
    Cato June.
     
  10. JB

    JB Old Curmudgeon

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2009
    Messages:
    28,518
    Likes Received:
    813
    Location:
    In Transit
    I believe you are thinking of Cato June

    and exactly dead on
     
  11. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,264
    Likes Received:
    1,546
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Exactly.

    Cato June.

    Thanks, guys.
     
  12. GP

    GP Go Texans!

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2005
    Messages:
    17,747
    Likes Received:
    1,573
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    Sooooo glad he isn't on our team. A one-year deal? OK. That says it all.

    Seriously. He would have been a huge downer for this team.

    He plays the same sob story everywhere he goes. "People don't listen to me. I got ideas, man. You know that infomercial for 10-minute abs? I'm going to do a 9-minute abs infomercial."
     
  13. eriadoc

    eriadoc Texan-American

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2004
    Messages:
    19,222
    Likes Received:
    1,981
    Rep. There are no excuses for mediocrity this year. A quick glance at guys they could have had (trade or FA), if they wanted them bad enough:

    Faneca
    Darren Sharper (going ahead and adding him here, b/c it's a foregone conclusion)
    Anquan Boldin
    Santonio Holmes
    Antonio Cromartie
    Thomas Jones
    John Henderson
    Kirk Morrison (not a direct fit, but he was had for a song)
    Jason Campbell (better than Dan-O?)
    Nathan Vasher
    Lito Sheppard
    Aaron Kampman ...


    ... and about 100 other guys. Then you have the guys that are being talked about as possibly on the block lor being cut, like Atogwe, or Haynesworthless. I'm not saying we should have gone after any particular one of those, but it's obvious there were some deals to be had this off-season and the Texans have turned their nose up at every one of them.

    So they built it, now win with it.
     
  14. bckey

    bckey Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    2,335
    Likes Received:
    151
    We need this guy really bad. Wilson can't be counted on.
     
  15. ArlingtonTexan

    ArlingtonTexan Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    465
    I think my post was reactionary versus logical, but why do we rarely create buzz?

    Let me sleep on this, but Fanaca like June like Moulds, like Green were "NAMES" who were past prime when either signed them or were "looking" at them. At some point, some player who fits what we do should a guy who the non-hardcore fans gets excited about. Me thinks the Texans get to locked into "their" way ( smart, tough, character, etc) versus is the guy a good football player. I don't think these concepts are mutually exclusive.
     
  16. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,264
    Likes Received:
    1,546
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    Take a step back and take off your Texans glasses for a moment. How many teams make splashes by signing big names and making astounding deals every year? I haven't tried to run numbers on this (and there's a huge amount of subjectivity on deciding which moves are splashy and which moves aren't) but I think that most years, most teams don't make splashy moves. So the fact that the Texans as a team haven't made a bunch of huge splashy moves over the first few years of its existence isn't that peculiar.

    And we have gone after some guys who've been the "top" of the FA market (like Weaver and Green) and we have made some splashy moves (like the trade for Schaub). I could be wrong (and I'm sure someone will correct me) but I think we've made at least as many "splashy" moves over the past 4-5 years as the other teams in our division over that same time period.

    Personally, I think we're about average when it comes to all that.

    It might be interesting to sit down with a sampling of teams and see if we can figure out how many "splashy" moves they make on average.
     
    WolverineFan likes this.
  17. Big Poundcake

    Big Poundcake Veteran

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    176
    Likes Received:
    7
    How about a vet CB like Dre Bly?
     
  18. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,575
    Likes Received:
    2,686
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    FWIW - McClain said this morning that Faneca was approached by several teams including the Texans and gave none of them a chance because he wanted to be with the coaches in Arizona. And it isn't just the $2.5 mil because the Jets will be paying him $5.25 mil this year as well.

    As for Sharper - dude is 36 years old and somebody is going to overpay him and then be surprised when he ends up with 1 INT next year.
     
    WolverineFan and BIG TORO like this.
  19. WolverineFan

    WolverineFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4,444
    Likes Received:
    296
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Everytime we go after an older FA it ends up being an absolute fail. And yet, it never fails that if we fail to sign a guy like this a billion fans will throw a shit storm because we aren't doing enough to win. Ridiculous.
     
  20. ArlingtonTexan

    ArlingtonTexan Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2004
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    465
    I think the tough part would defining splashy move in any sort of objective way. There is a lot of "I know it when I see it" to the concept. Obviously, the frustration is tied to not winning. When i think of Indy the team we have chased for the last 8 years, they operate very much like the Texans. They draft according to their system with a bunch of smart, normally high character guys that don't really excite the masses when drafted or acquired.
     

Share This Page