michaelm
vox nihili
Up yours dude, you shut it.
Whatever, the Texans are a one half football team, and you're ghey!
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
Up yours dude, you shut it.
Whatever, the Texans are a one half football team, and you're ghey!
aww, Shut it, DB!!!
Up yours dude, you shut it.
Whatever, the Texans are a one half football team, and you're ghey!
lol! You're crackin' me up, big guy!
And of course I'm laughing because you're big enough to turn my frown upside down!
aww, Shut it, DB!!!
Up yours dude, you shut it.
Whatever, the Texans are a one half football team, and you're ghey!
Bite me... you're not a good texans fan anyway!
That was A Tale of Two Halves of michaelm...
Thank you, I'll be here all week.... but you'll probably want to ignore my posts based on recent samples... lol
hey, is it legal that all his voices can rep each other?I think this an excellent example of the kind of negativity that's taken root around here. I move that michaelm be banned.
All of them
hey, is it legal that all his voices can rep each other?
:vincepalm: Can someone explain this to me, because I really don't understand why so many people are bitching about not scoring points in the 2nd half?
It was obvious the game plan was changed, because the game was getting out of hand...yet people want to complain that the Texans didn't score points. Sorry, don't get the criticism at all.
I can only speak for myself. I'm not concerned about the points as I fully expected Kubiak to give them a steady dose of our RB carosel in the second half. He always dials things back when we get the lead. He's not about rubbing the other team's face in the dirt.
I was concerned about the sloppy 2nd half play.
- No penalties in the first half, four in the second (although one of them was that B/S "defenseless WR call).
- An INT in the redzone, when there was no need to pass. It's the start of the 4th qtr. We're up 34-zip. The objective is to burn up the clock and get out with a win. So I ask you, Why pass AT ALL?? Run it up the gut 3 times and at least get the three pts. Frankly, I'm surprised the Pink Soapers aren't all over this. Cowher would have handed it to the Bus three times and called it a day. ...is there a truce I didn't hear about?
- Then there was Ben Tate's fumble. His whole job with that kind of lead is to chew up clock and protect the ball. He kinda forgot about that second part.
So it's not the points for me, it's the sloppy play and weird play calling in the red zone.
Forget 35-3. How about the leads on the Colts in the past? How about the Rosencopter game? How about the big lead on the Rams in the Fitzpatrick game? There are way more recent and pertinent reasons to have concern about blowing a second half lead than 35-3.
Nonetheless, I'm not concerned about the let-up. The INTs bug me, but letting up is ... well, not OK really, but understandable. This team is good enough to nurse a 34 point lead, whereas past Texan teams may not have been. And like I said in another thread, if this team is going to pick only one half to play, I'd rather it be the first half and play from ahead.
i heard this lame reasoning this morning on 790 from a caller. This isnt college football where u have to earn style points to impress some panel of psuedo-intellectuals that your the best in the nation. this is PRO sports, where a little dignity is afforded your opponent. up 34 entering the 2nd half & dominating the way we had been, i knew we'd call off the dogs b/c every pro team would do so in that situation..& rightfully so. up by that much, u don't pile on just b/c u know u can. u cut the playbook in half & run the ball so as to control the clock & only pass when u need to. if u still wind up scoring that way, it usually takes lots of time off the clock & no real gamesmanship has been forfeited by either team.
the larger goal at that point for 99% of coaches is to get out of the game as fast & as healthy as possible while also providing an opportunity for your opponent to "bow out gracefully" in a back-handed kind of way.
now having said all that, you still want to see the team EXECUTE better in whatever they were running in the 2nd half, but lack of execution still doesnt equivocate to them taking their foot off the gas imo. they did what any team would've done in that situation...yes even belichick. anyone who says otherwise hasn't watched a patriots game very closely.
:vincepalm: Can someone explain this to me, because I really don't understand why so many people are bitching about not scoring points in the 2nd half?
It was obvious the game plan was changed, because the game was getting out of hand...yet people want to complain that the Texans didn't score points. Sorry, don't get the criticism at all.
The Colts did not stop the Texans from scoring, the Texans stopped the Texans from scoring points.
Trust me when peyton was up by 30 points he stilled scored points, he has done it more than once against us. All I'm saying is, last year we played one half either the first or second half, and we did it again yesterday, in my eyes this is a concern.
The defense did play a great game, the whole game.
OK. Last year after walking out of Reliant in week 1 I had this thought in the back of my mind. I was concerned about the yards that PM put up. Today, from the comfort of my couch, I wonder if we have another nemesis.
I'm not concerned that we didn't score in the second half, I'm concerned that we didn't execute well at all. I understand you run the ball but the two turnovers were just plain unacceptable. If it happens against a team not missing its best player that is a serious problem.
Two years ago we started strong and finished slow. Last year we started slow and finished strong and we can't do that again. This team needs to show it can play 4 quarters of football. Execute for a full game or we're in some serious trouble over the course of a season.
Mike