A little update on the LA stadium...

Discussion in 'The National Football League' started by Kulluminatii, Dec 24, 2009.

  1. Kulluminatii

    Kulluminatii Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    232
    Location:
    California
    As of right now, there are 7 teams being targeted.

    They are (in no particular order):

    • Oakland Raiders
    • St. Louis Rams
    • Jacksonville Jaguars
    • San Diego Chargers
    • Minnesota Vikings
    • Buffalo Bills
    • San Francisco 49ers

    Some things to note:


    • Ed Roski (main financial backer of LA Stadium) wants to own the team. This probably means the Raiders won't be moving to LA Stadium (doesn't necessarily mean they won't move to LA). As you all know, Davis isn't ever going to let go of "his" team :brickwall:. I believe Roski has the best chance to buy the Rams, followed by the Jags.


    • From the video on this page (link: http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/sports/nfl-football-future-in-los-angeles-20091201 ) the man in the video says there is a 50/50 chance a team will be playing in LA next season (probably in the Coliseum until LA Stadium is finished), and a "100%" chance of one playing there by 2011. He seems pretty confident, I would imagine they are pretty close to striking a deal with a team then.


    • Ideally, they want 2 teams in LA. This was a rumor floating around for a while, but I guess it is true. Judging from the video, it seems as if they would like to get both teams in LA at the same time. Not really sure what to make of it.



    I personally think depending on how the Jags fare in the postseason that they are the most likely to move. If they do well (or by some miracle make it to the SuperBowl) then they will probably stay a bit longer. If not the Jags, I can see the Rams coming back to LA.

    The teams I don't see moving to LA are the 49ers, Vikings, and Bills. 49ers are Northern California's team, and I doubt they will be successful in SoCal. I feel that the Vikings and Bills have a strong fanbase already in place, and I doubt the owner of either team would want to sell their team.



    What do you guys think? Which team(s) out of those 7 will most likely be moving to LA? The least likely?
     
  2. MannyFresh

    MannyFresh El Capitan

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,105
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Rosenberg, TX
    I still can't get over Cali possibly having 4 teams again and they want LA team "2"?
     
  3. Kulluminatii

    Kulluminatii Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    232
    Location:
    California
    Well, California is pretty big. If all of the Cali teams stay and two new ones are brought in...that will be 5 teams. I don't see how 5 teams in Cali would work. Guess it will be an interesting offseason :kitten:.
     
  4. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. 2 more teams? In LA? Where team after team has failed to stick?

    I'd totally rather create more teams. One in LA, one in San Antonio, one in Canada somewheres, and one in North Dakota.

    What? WHy the hell not in North Dakota?
     
  5. 4Texans

    4Texans Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    1,074
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Texas
    I'm a little old school, so I would like to see the Rams back in LA.
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2009
  6. TEXANS84

    TEXANS84 Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    7,480
    Likes Received:
    365
    Location:
    The Woodlands, TX
    They need no more than one team back in LA.

    They have trouble selling out some Chargers games in San Diego and they are one of the best teams in the AFC right now.
     
  7. infantrycak

    infantrycak Mod. Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    55,589
    Likes Received:
    2,688
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    No matter how big LA is they have a history of failing to support teams. I don't see in chance of them getting two teams. The Jags are the team best poised to go. Even when they make play-off runs they aren't supported.
     
  8. Stemp

    Stemp Brew Master

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    7,150
    Likes Received:
    495
    Location:
    Temple, TX
    They only want a team in LA for the TV market, where all the money is made.
     


  9. GuerillaBlack

    GuerillaBlack Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2006
    Messages:
    9,217
    Likes Received:
    622
    Location:
    Montrose
    Why wouldn't it? Florida has just 18 million people and has three teams. The LA region alone has 18 million people.... It could work, but best not to overload now. LA has already lost two teams before. I think the Jags will make a new home in LA. MJD will become the new Kobe/Manny (just the football version).
     
  10. WWJD

    WWJD Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 6, 2004
    Messages:
    5,260
    Likes Received:
    139
    I don't see how it can be any team BUT the Jags moving. Their attendance is embarrassing to the NFL.
     
  11. Kulluminatii

    Kulluminatii Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    232
    Location:
    California
    The NFL has stated multiple times they don't want to have any more expansion teams. They would like to stick with the 32 teams they have now.

    Also, Rams and Raiders didn't move only because of low attendance. Davis moved because he failed to get a new stadium....and because he's Al Davis :fingergun:. Rams I believe also moved for a similar reason, plus then-owner Frontiere was from St. Louis; so I guess the decision to move and alienate a ton of fans in LA was simple.

    I have a strong feeling in 2010 we will see the Los Angeles Jaguars (or whatever they decide to call the team). IF the Jags do move, I wonder if they will stay in the AFC South.
     
  12. Goldensilence

    Goldensilence hipster elite

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,211
    Likes Received:
    353
    Location:
    Austin
    Most sense would be to move St. Louis back to LA and soon after Jags to St. Louis. If there wasn't such history with the AFC west, the most sense would be move the LA team to the NFC west to replace the Rams and then have either KC or Denver move to the AFC South.

    Possibly new LA ownership is highballing for two but, really looking for only one team. I don't see how the ycould convince the NFL with their history they could keep support for two teams. Personally I'm still leery they can even support one for a prolonged period.
     
  13. Ryan

    Ryan THIS YEAR

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    285
    Location:
    Beaumont,Tx
    If The Jags move to LA, i think it'd call for a realignment, which could do nothing but benefit the Texans. I don't think it'd happen due to classic rivalries but here's how the AFC should look.

    AFC South:
    Texans
    Titans
    Chiefs
    Dolphins?

    AFC North:
    Bengals
    Browns
    Colts
    Steelers

    AFC East:
    Ravens
    Pats
    Jets
    Bills

    AFC West:
    Broncos
    Raiders
    Chargers
    Jags


    This is me just brainstorming here, and i really doubt a realignment would happen, but man that'd be awesome for us.
     
  14. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    2,382
    I think the only team that should be moving to LA is the Rams. They belong in LA and they're in an ideal situation to actually find themselves moving to LA. The Jaguars would then move (at a slightly later time) to St. Louis to fill the void left by the Rams. Jacksonville will (unfortunately for the fans there) fade back into the obscurity that is its destiny.

    This works out perfectly because St. Louis was a favorite to get the expansion team that became the Jaguars. They could even change their name to the "St Louis Stallions" like they intended when they tried to get the expansion team that became the Jags if they want to avoid stepping on (dubious) Jacksonville's style.

    [​IMG]

    And two teams? No chance in hell.
     
  15. SheTexan

    SheTexan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Messages:
    7,142
    Likes Received:
    778
    Location:
    Pasadena, Texas
    I don't care as long as they leave the Niners alone! IMHO, LA doesn't deserve a team at all. They have had numerous chances and blown them all. Screw the TV market, it won't be any different.

    And just because this is an opinion board, and I'm in a foul mood, I hope San Antonio NEVER gets an NFL team. It would be a bigger failure than Jacksonville.
     
  16. imatexan

    imatexan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2006
    Messages:
    2,792
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    *History of failing to support NFL teams not other sports.
     
  17. Fred

    Fred All Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    954
    Likes Received:
    188
    The Jags can barely fill half the stadium when they are fighting for a playoff spot. Time for them to move somewhere. It would add a lot more interest to the AFC South if we had the LA Jags (or Tiger Woods could buy them and change the name to the "Cheatahs"). Or a realignment (why is Indianapolis in the "South"? They are about the same distance to Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Chicago as Katy is to Baytown.)

    I think 32 teams is perfect. Expansion will screw up the beauty of each conference having 4 divisions with 4 teams. Unless you add 8 teams, you will have uneven division sizes. And then people will start agigating for turning the playoffs into basketball or hockey (you have a team? not the Clippers? welcome to the playoffs!) However, there are already teams in Green Bay, Irving - oops - Arlington, Nashville, Jacksonville, Foxboro and 2 in East Rutherford so maybe North Dakota makes sense...
     
  18. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,764
    Likes Received:
    1,948
    Location:
    Houston
    North Dakota? Damn, they better have an indoor stadium. :eek:
     
  19. barrett

    barrett Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 31, 2007
    Messages:
    2,711
    Likes Received:
    282
    Location:
    Austin
    Realignment is very unlikely.

    Totally unrelated, I'd like to see us doing a home and home with the Saints. I think that could become a good rivalry. Cowboys too. I'd like the NFL to create more rivalries. And eliminate the record based games. Instead of playing the damn Dolphins every year we would play another rivalry game with one of those teams.
     
  20. Speedy

    Speedy Yeller Dweller

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,477
    Likes Received:
    441
    Location:
    The Livable Forest
    Why would the Jags have to move out of the AFC South if they went to LA? Last time I checked, LA was in the southern half of the U.S.
     

Share This Page