4 Man fronts

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by dc_txtech, Apr 28, 2012.

  1. dc_txtech

    dc_txtech Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    2,543
    Likes Received:
    315
    Location:
    Round Rock
    Who is going to come in on DL when we go to our Nickel and Dime packages?

    We have a lot of options but right now I'm thinking

    Barwin Watt Smith Mercilus

    Thoughts?
     
  2. The Pencil Neck

    The Pencil Neck Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    21,034
    Likes Received:
    1,494
    Location:
    Moraira, Spain
    That looks about right to me.

    With Reed and Cush playing the LBs.
     
  3. gtexan02

    gtexan02 Working?

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    15,785
    Likes Received:
    1,243
    Location:
    Boston
    Early reports seem to indicate Crick will have a role in the 4 man front as well.

    Maybe Barwin Crick Smith Watt
     
  4. kiwitexansfan

    kiwitexansfan Site Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    472
    Location:
    Auckland, New Zealand
    I think you'll see a whole bunch of looks from them. We have plenty of bodies who can do the job and they will keep it fresh and relentless.

    They will give Crick some looks inside in those situations.
     
  5. WolverineFan

    WolverineFan Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4,444
    Likes Received:
    296
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    DE - Barwin
    DT - Watt
    DT - Smith
    DE - Mercilus

    Crick works in there in rotation at DT.
     
  6. Allstar

    Allstar Bona fide

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,092
    Likes Received:
    175
    Wade explicitly stated he could use a front of Barwin/Reed/Mercilus/Watt/Smith/Cush yesterday. He said they would find the best way to do that, and not try to just stick the players in to fit them into a preset package. That's my favorite thing about Wade, he changes his system to fit the players and not the other way around.
     
  7. BorrowMe

    BorrowMe Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    97
    Likes Received:
    4
    Who said we were gonna go with 4 man fronts in nickle and dime situations? Wade clearly said that he was gonna put the best players possible at the same time in those situations meaning that we might go with more exotic looks having Reed, Barwin, Watt, Cushing, Mercyless, Crick, and Antonio.
     
  8. welsh texan

    welsh texan Lest we forget

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    163
    Location:
    Llandudno, Wales
    The possibilities are almost endless, Wade can get seriously inventive with the looks we throw out, and not only because of new personnel, but a proper off-season too.

    I like that teams may not know what front we're going to give them until moments before the snap too.

    You see a front 7 of Watt Smith Cody Mercilus Barwin Cushing Reed in the huddle, when they come to the line they show 4-3, then suddenly at the snap one stands up and we're effortlessly into 3-4, we play a lot of inexperienced QB's in our division next season, thats got to throw them off somewhat.
     


  9. Thorn

    Thorn Dirty Old Man

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    24,566
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Location:
    Houston
    Wade has saved the Texans. And he's said a few times that's what he does, tweaking his system to fit the players, not the other way around. It makes so much sense, that you wonder why it even has to be mentioned.
     
  10. Allstar

    Allstar Bona fide

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    2,092
    Likes Received:
    175
    Makes you wonder why it's not a more widely used practice in the league.
     
  11. DocBar

    DocBar Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2005
    Messages:
    9,942
    Likes Received:
    473
    Location:
    I'm international
    The really good coordinators do this. Lesser coordinators probably resort to the "Coach Red Beaulieu", from the Waterboy, method of coaching. They only know what's in the book and aren't comfortable or creative enough to tweak the system to fit the players.
     
  12. welsh texan

    welsh texan Lest we forget

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,680
    Likes Received:
    163
    Location:
    Llandudno, Wales
    I'm a department manager in a major supermarket, you see it all the time, the less able the manager, the more they stick to the rules, do things by the book.

    It inevitably fails because you have to be able to think on your feet and change things to suit the situation.

    In coaching the effect is twofold, because its that less capable coach who's written his own rulebook, not somebody more able in a higher position.

    I believe this explains perfectly Frank Bush's initial success followed by later failure, as he tried to mold the players to fit his scheme.

    From what I see, Wade's scheme is a pretty flimsy concept, hybrid 3-4/4-3, changing depending on the personnel available, and allowing the players to perform to their strengths.
     
  13. TimeKiller

    TimeKiller Guest

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    7,648
    Likes Received:
    548
    Location:
    This giant tree, standing 10,000 ft. high but not
    Lots of packages available now with another high effort 5tech and an athletic OLB in the fray.

    With 4 hands in the dirt I think you could have any combo of the following:

    Inside: Antonio, Watt, Crick, Mitchell
    Edge rusher: Barwin, Reed, Mercilus, Watt, Cushing, Braman

    The Combos are endless and all viable. THIS is the pass rush we've been longing for. Mario Williams left and it's going to take another step FORWARD. Fresh legs, lots of will power and plenty of talent, this front 7 is going to be hell on wheels.
     
  14. SteveSlaton20

    SteveSlaton20 All Pro

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    808
    Likes Received:
    27
    Four man fronts
    Barwin/Watt/Smith/Reed
    Mercilus/Crick/Jamison/Braman
    Mitchell and Cody can play the DTs also

    the ILBs/Nickel/Dime
    Cushing and Sharpton
    James and Dobbins

    Cushing would be the LB in the dime, followed by Sharpton whenever he's resting or hurt, then James, or Dobbins.
    Sharpton and James are interchangeable cuz we don't know who'll be starting, I'd prefer Sharpton though.

    the DBs
    Joseph LCB
    Kareem RCB
    Brice Nickel
    Harris Dime
    Quin Safety
    Manning Safety

    Manning and Quin can move down into nickel/dime and we can put in another safety at the top, troy nolan or queintin demps. the other two unnamed dbs are sherrick mcmanis and roc carmichael (if we're carrying 6 CBs)
     
  15. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,363
    Likes Received:
    562
    yup, though smith and watt will be swapped (watt at LDT and smith RDT more often than not), and the DE's will change their alignment often. reed, nading, and braman will sub at DE. crick, mitchell, and jamison will sub at tackle. we have the versatility to go heavier or lighter depending on varying situations, but that will be the standard.

    cushing's going to be out there basically every down, with sharpton probably getting most of the 42 nickel snaps (james getting the first two downs).
     
  16. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    I hope Wade doesn't do away with bumping Quinn down to a joker position and bringing in another safety. That was a very succesful formation for us last year.

    I'd rather not have Reed or Mercilus playing LB in the Nickel. I'd rather they just be in a rotation and keeping the D-line and OLB's fresh.

    In some long passing situations I would like to see Watt, Smith, Crick, Merci, and Reed on the field all rushing the passer though.

    Merci, Watt, Crick, Smith, Reed on the line all going after the QB with Cushing At LB behind them. Mix in some Cush-blitzes and QB's are going to be in trouble..
     
  17. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,363
    Likes Received:
    562
    while nice, and probably somewhere on the menu because of wade's 52 base, i think we'd be better off with a traditional nickel alignment and i'm guessing wade feels the same. the difference being cushing - an elite level blitzer inside or out, he allows a more creative gameplan. in those situations you want to be more flexible and having two cover linebackers gives you that when one can also move along the line to choose his target, as opposed to a slightly more overwhelming but much more obvious front.
     
  18. Rey

    Rey Guest

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Messages:
    14,475
    Likes Received:
    671
    I said in some (keyword being some) situations.

    If I'm going off of what Wade did last year I would guess that he'd continue to use the three safety Nickel package with Quinn basically playing the second LB.

    My point was that we have flexibility now and can be creative. I didn't say that should be our base nickel package.
     
  19. Scooter

    Scooter Funky

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    5,363
    Likes Received:
    562
    appologies, i assumed too much reading your post - i read it as more of requesting it as the standard long distance formation. dont get me wrong, i'd love to see it as well on a few occasions. when playing around with play designs mirroring wade's system, i actually did create 5/1 options pretty often. like i said i'm sure wade's got it on the menu, but i dont see it actually showing up because the preferred flexibility (like the 3S you mentioned for example) belongs in the secondary much more than in the front in passing situations.
     

Share This Page