4-3 vs. 3-4

Discussion in 'Texans Talk' started by Texans Horror, Dec 21, 2006.

?

Has the defense improved because of the shift from the 3-4 to the 4-3?

  1. Yes, the 4-3 is better than the 3-4.

    33 vote(s)
    55.9%
  2. The 4-3 is just as good as the 3-4.

    20 vote(s)
    33.9%
  3. No, the 4-3 is worse than the 3-4.

    6 vote(s)
    10.2%
  1. Texans Horror

    Texans Horror Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    2,303
    Likes Received:
    134
    The defensive line was the biggest overhaul this past offseason (except for the coaching staff). With the season almost over, I was wondering what people thought of the defensive unit and whether it has improved by way of the new scheme or if it is as bad or worse than before.

    Personally, I think it is looking better, and I think the Texans got better performances from key people who have played in both systems (TJ, Babin).
     
  2. Bubbajwp

    Bubbajwp All Flopper

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2005
    Messages:
    3,214
    Likes Received:
    101
    Location:
    In the Warehouse
    depends on the players more.
     
    Texans Horror likes this.
  3. Ryan

    Ryan THIS YEAR

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    5,343
    Likes Received:
    285
    Location:
    Beaumont,Tx
    the defense has improved and is getting better..but i dont know if it is thanks to the 4-3.
     
    Texans Horror likes this.
  4. TheOgre

    TheOgre Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    3,739
    Likes Received:
    53
    Location:
    Back in the cellar again
    It isn't a 3-4 vs. a 4-3 thing so much as we never had the talent for the 3-4. The 3-4 defense is more sensitive to talent IMO than the 4-3. In other words, the 3-4 utilizes, yet also exposes, your talent more. You can cover up bad talent easier in the 4-3 than the 3-4.
     
    Texans Horror and Porky like this.
  5. Texan_Bill

    Texan_Bill Subscribed Contributor

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2003
    Messages:
    48,659
    Likes Received:
    2,082
    Location:
    Houston. Mediocrity Lives Here!!
    I agree... Personnel to fit a particular system is the most important thing... We did not ever reach the talent level needed to run a 3-4. It can be a very effective defense (see San Diego, Pittsburgh past, New England, etc.)

    http://daily.nysun.com/Repository/g...Type=text/html&Path=NYS/2003/09/17&ID=Ar01400
     
    Texans Horror likes this.
  6. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    Every other team were able to find right personnel to run 3-4 defense except Capers. One example to look at would be Cowboys, they converted to 3-4 defense two years letter then us but look at their team now.

    Previous management and coaching staff had absolutely no eye for talent. Capers had stated when he drafted Babin that he can play like Gregg LLoyd. I don't see even 1% resemblance to Lloyd game in Babin. Another wasted high pick.

    I don't know exactly what Mr. Bob McNair show in those two guys to bring them aboard. They have sent our team back at least 5 years. capers is good DC and that is all he will ever be, he doesn't have the vision to ever be HC.

    Personally speaking I love 3-4 defense but you need the right coach to lead with aside from personnel. I would have preferred Capers to be our DC rather then HC.
     
  7. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas
    I see it totally opposite... I think talent has to be superior in the 4-3, because that guy in front of you knows you're coming. You've got to be bigger, faster or stronger than he is, or you won't do much of anything.

    In the 3-4.... the trick is to fool them so they don't know who is coming. Dropping a LB into coverage is more effective in a 3-4 than dropping 290lb DEs..

    The 3-4 takes Brains, the 4-3 takes brawn.

    plus you're always running against a 5 man front in a 3-4, as opposed to a 4 man front in a 4-3.

    the problem, going from a 3-4 to a 4-3 is usually finding DEs that will impact the game. Our problem for some reason was/is finding LBs..... I guess with 4 on the field, it's easier to cover the underneath routes than it is with three LBs in a 4-3.
     
  8. thunderkyss

    thunderkyss Salem Poor

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2005
    Messages:
    38,814
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Location:
    Texas


    Yeah, I like Babin, but I don't see any Gregg LLoyd in him.

    But if you look at Dallas' 3-4, and ours.... they were totally different.

    we had a svelt NT, but big bodied DEs...... didn't make sense to me.

    Dallas, and New England, and SanDiego, and Pittsburgh, and SF all have svelt DEs, and big bodied NTs...

    Jason Ferguson for the Cowboys look more like TJ & Robair Smith(that would have been my NT if I were calling the shots.......), and Richard Seymour, Chris Canty, Marcus Spears look like Mario Williams.
     


  9. Hervoyel

    Hervoyel The Right Track

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    15,565
    Likes Received:
    2,348
    Anyones 4-3 is better than Vic Fangios 3-4.

    That being said the defense is better because we've added some talent and are running a system (4-3) that a lot of our existing talent is better suited to playing. We have also put a few guys out of position by making the change but we obviously helped more than we hurt.

    Of course anyones defense is going to be in for a long day if it's playing alongside the 2006 Houston Texans offense.
     
    WiiBrawler and Runner like this.
  10. painekiller

    painekiller Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,067
    Likes Received:
    124
    Location:
    On the West Belt
    Either defense depend on the front 7. And we never had the right guys in the 3-4. But the problem is we currently do not have the right guys for the 4-3. We are still an OLB away at the very least.

    I hope we see alot of Anderson these last 2 games, he seems to be making plays. If he can become an all around SAM LB, that will save this team some time and free up a draft choice for the secondary or DT. Not saying he will be this guy but he has earned some more playing time. Find out now on the field.
     
  11. Grid

    Grid Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    4,299
    Likes Received:
    244
    the 4-3 is as good as the 3-4.. there have been top defenses from both systems.

    I prefer the 4-3 because:

    1. It is a straight forward defense that focuses on the fun stuff.. like sacking the QB

    2. It is better against the run

    3. When those elite LB and DE prospects come out, you can actually draft one instead of going back and forth about whether they can gain/lose 20 pounds to fit into a 3-4 position.



    My favorite kind of defense to watch is a 4-3 that puts emphasis on speed. I love to see a fast, athletic defense that is all over the field. Very entertaining to me.
     
  12. Drager

    Drager Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Any defense(3-4 or 4-3) is better if you've got talented personnel. Look at the Bears from '85 to '86. They go from the attacking "46"-defense to a bend-but-don't-break approach. Both years they dominated defensively because they had some really good players.

    I like our defense. I think it's easier to run a 4-3 without the right personnel than it is to run a 3-4 w/o the right people. They've played so much better since that opening 4-game stretch. They really looked confused back then. They seem to be executing much better & I like our aggressive play. I would like to see Mario getting more QB pressures, but I know he's playing on a bad foot right now. But next year he'd better apply pressure on QB's alot more consistently. But he has shown some flashes. I also hope we can get some serious upgrades at both safety positions for next. Brown & Earl make alot of mistakes. I've seen alot of missed tackles, taking bad angles to the ball carrier, & seeing them bite on the short route as the deep guy goes sprinting by is pretty damn scary.

    I like fast, blitzing 4-3's like Jim Johnson's in Philly. I hate watching crappy-ass prevent defenses. I'd rather take a chance & try to force them into an error rather than sitting back & getting taken apart. I like the Texans aggressive play calling on D. Yeah, it may have cost us the Titans game, but I liked the blitz on that final play. I mean, pretty much the only way we get pressure on any QB is with our blitzes. It will be alot better to watch those blitzes when we have a better secondary. Dunta's needs help in the secondary pretty bad. But that's in addition to all of our other holes.
     
  13. ATX

    ATX Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    9,563
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    Austin
    I believe it comes down mostly to personnel and who can fit in your system.

    The advantage personnel wise in the 3-4 is that you need less linemen, which are harder to come by than LBs. Well that's what Capers said.....remember when he used to have like 20-30 LBs in training camp when Capers was here?
     
  14. BattleRedToro

    BattleRedToro Thread Killer

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    201
    There are many that say that a 3-4 is better against the run than a 4-3. I agree with others that what matters most is if you have the right personnel for the system you are running and second is the playcalling. In general, it is better to be unpredictable, but if you are going to be predictable then your team needs to master the execution of their play.
     
  15. Second Honeymoon

    Second Honeymoon Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,330
    Likes Received:
    437
    Location:
    The Woodlands, Texas
    my thoughts exactly. go with what you know and stop trying to let a system dictate who and what you draft.
     
  16. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    This is what I was trying to point out. Previous management and the coaching staff had absolutely no idea how to build a team and obviously they also had absolutely NO eye for the talent.

    I know this statement is very harsh against Capers since he had a great reputations as a 3-4 GURU but this is also a fact. I don't know who contributed how much into deciding on personnel decision but 95% of the selections were bad. Except for AJ and DRob we wasted our draft picks the first 3 or 4 years.

    I have never been a cowboys fans and that team was just as bad as these Texans 5 years ago but I just love what Parcell has done with their defense. They are not a finished product by any means but they sure look good right now.

    Imagine how we could have been if coaching staff and management had made good decision with the personel move.

    Explanation given to us by Capers after selecting Babin was that he sees allot of GREG LLOYD in Babin play where as I don't see any thing in Babin that will indicate to me that is any resemblence of Lloyd.

    The last two draft picks by Capers Babin and Travis Johnson are both wasted picks. They are both nothing more then high priced back ups. Johnson is not motivated enough to play every down and Babin has become situational player who comes in 3rd down. Look what we had to give up to acquire Babin. Instead of Travis Johnson we could have had Derrick Johnson from UT to play along with Demeco right now.

    Kubiak has done a good job with his draft picks last year. All the picks has been solid GOLD. He needs to do the same for the next 4-5 years for us to have any chance to become respectable in this league. It won't happen with one or two year draft picks. Even with good draft picks next year I don't expect us to be 500 ball club. It will require atleast 2008 draft picks before we reach 500 ball club unless Texans spend enormous amount of money in free agency this off season.

    One has to remember previous management has wasted money in free agency. I expect Kubiak to clean house this off season of all the dead weights and non productive players with high salaries.
     
  17. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    I wish we had some one like Jimmy Johnson as our DC. I simply love his game planning and agressive attitude on the field by his defense.

    He reminds me in allot of ways to Buddy Ryans.
     
  18. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    We won't see real Mario till we build the DL. Opposing teams target Mario from get go and he gets double and tripple team every time. We need better DT's in our line up who can collapse the pocket. Payne is not the answer for us at DT position and Travis Johnson lacks consistency.

    The reason Julius Pepper is do dominant is because he has supporting cast on his defensive line to take double blockers and collapse the pocket. Presently Mario doesn't have that luxury.
     
  19. Drager

    Drager Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Buddy Ryan does have two sons in the NFL. Not a surprise that they're both DC's!!! Son Rob has done good things with little at Oakland. Rex has also done an outstanding job at Baltimore. The Ravens are number #1 in yardage allowed & points. Not too bad to have sons coaching the #1 & #4 defense in the NFL.

    While I'd like to have Rex as our DC, I think Smith has done a good job. Our defense has come a long way. They should be even better next year. At least I hope.
     
  20. dbspi

    dbspi Veteran

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2004
    Messages:
    360
    Likes Received:
    17
    Yes Smith has done a great job no doubt. We still lack so many pieces on defense but year or two it will be really good if the management fill in all the gaps.

    1. We need solid DT play - TJ has been inconsistent for most part but we still need one more DT to play along with him who can collapse the pocket and free Mario of double teams. I think Payne career is pretty much over.
    2. We need OLB who can play along with Demeco.
    3. We need stud CB who can play along with DRob.
    4. We need good FS
    5. Once # 1-4 requirements is met then we will also need a stud DE opposite to Mario who can flat out chase the QB all day.

    I really like to see Texans give blank check to Nate Clements this off season and sign him and pursue Sand (DT from Oakland) this off season. Draft FS and OLB.
    Sands is playing behind two hall of famer but he is stud in every sense and he never takes plays off. He collapses the pocket and is good in both run defense as well as pass defense.

    Sands (DT) - 6'7 335 llb
     

Share This Page