NitroGSXR
Super Sic #58
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/fb/texansfront/5786940.html
Actually, I'm confused by the article in its entirety. I'm not sure what he's trying to approach with the logic being implemented in there somewhere. Does anyone understand the article? Maybe an explaination? Explain it to me as if I was a six year old? Or is an explaination needed as if I was an adult?
This is just a useless article if you were to ask me? Absolutely utterly useless.
What? I don't really get this. Below average with Andre Johnson? I'm really confused by this assertation. Can anyone relate to what Solomon's trying to say? I could ask him but that probably won't even garner a reply. It's tough getting writers to answer questions at times.Jerome Solomon said:The Texans' receiving corps isn't nearly as good as most think it is. In fact, it is considered below average even if you rank Pro Bowler Andre Johnson among the top five wideouts in the league, which both of our scouts do.
Our guys say the 2004 and '05 starting group of Jabar Gaffney, Andre Johnson, Corey Bradford and tight end Mark Bruener barely edges the current backup crew of André Davis, Jacoby Jones, David Anderson and an older Bruener, thanks to Johnson.
Actually, I'm confused by the article in its entirety. I'm not sure what he's trying to approach with the logic being implemented in there somewhere. Does anyone understand the article? Maybe an explaination? Explain it to me as if I was a six year old? Or is an explaination needed as if I was an adult?
This is just a useless article if you were to ask me? Absolutely utterly useless.