There has been some debate as to what it takes to finish 8-8. What do you have to do. Specifically what do the Texans have to do?
If you look at Yards allowed only - which is a VERY poor indicator, that will vary from year to year. If however you look a little deeper... say at Completion%, YPC, YPC etc, you can actually get a much clearer picture at what it takes a team to get to .500. I have built a pretty cool little spreadsheet which anyone who wants it is welcome to have. I'll keep improving it and when I get it right I'll see if Hook'em is interested. Basically what it allows you to do is take season stats from www.profootballreference.com and plug them in and see where each team finished in each category. It highlights every catgory in Green if they finished in the top 1/3, Blue in the middle 1/3 and Red in the bottom 1/3.
OK first myth that stuck out,
"The Jets finished at 10/6 w/o finishing in the top 1/3 in any category.
The Jets were in the top 10 in the following:
Completion %
Rushes
Rushing TD FOR
Points Against
Yards Per Pass allowed
They were ranked 21st or lower in:
Passing TD
YPC
Rushing yards against
YPC against
Statistically, they do more things good (top 10) than bad (bottom 12) and they do most things better than average (top 16).
I'm not saying this is absolute by any stretch of the imagination. In fact if you look at the Titans, who also started VERY poorly, almost their entire line is red. If you look at teams like that and our Texans for that matter, They were getting killed when they lost, and barely winning when they won. Statistically however, they are an outlier, or an anomaly. For the most part, the farther down on the chart... the more red you see.
Basically there are several ways the Texans can go 8-8 or better.
The most likely and plausible to me is that things come together quickly, they start the season off with a couple of wins, and are generally better than I, or many of the other "naysayers" think they will early. The problem with counting on this is that there are just too many things you are depending on.I can buy this, hell, I hope it happens. I think however that you are just relying on too many things for this to happen. From Spencer coming back to Stanley figuring out how to angle punts again, you're asking for a lot to make this a reality. The biggest factor in this however, is the OL. The defence will need rest this year, its remarkable how often we lose players on defence on this team. If this is going to happen though we MUST GET TURNOVERS. Looking at this whole spreadsheet there is one number that is very consistent. Turnovers. Every team which won 12 or more games was in the top 8 in turnover difference. Other than the Vikings (10th) no team that won 6 games or fewer finished in the top 1/3 in turnover difference. This stat is the great equalizer. Also there was no team that lost more than 8 games who's Green numbers (top 10) out numbered the blue and red.
We catch a few teams on bad days. Anyone wanna know why we beat Indy last year? They had a bad day. Its always possible we catch a couple of teams on bad days.
So you CAN argue that the you believe the Texans will be next years Titans, statistically bad at everything, but not bad enough to lose more than half of their games. If you want to make that argument... have fun.
This year's Texans are no doubt better than last year's edition. I've said before, I think we will start the season about as well as a 4 win team. I think by the end of the year we will be an 8 win team who only won 6 games, but especially if the Birds don't have Vick, then by my estimation, we are only 1 win away from .500.
I'm gonna come back and read this again and try and post that spreadsheet somewhere if anyone is interested.
Mike
If you look at Yards allowed only - which is a VERY poor indicator, that will vary from year to year. If however you look a little deeper... say at Completion%, YPC, YPC etc, you can actually get a much clearer picture at what it takes a team to get to .500. I have built a pretty cool little spreadsheet which anyone who wants it is welcome to have. I'll keep improving it and when I get it right I'll see if Hook'em is interested. Basically what it allows you to do is take season stats from www.profootballreference.com and plug them in and see where each team finished in each category. It highlights every catgory in Green if they finished in the top 1/3, Blue in the middle 1/3 and Red in the bottom 1/3.
OK first myth that stuck out,
"The Jets finished at 10/6 w/o finishing in the top 1/3 in any category.
The Jets were in the top 10 in the following:
Completion %
Rushes
Rushing TD FOR
Points Against
Yards Per Pass allowed
They were ranked 21st or lower in:
Passing TD
YPC
Rushing yards against
YPC against
Statistically, they do more things good (top 10) than bad (bottom 12) and they do most things better than average (top 16).
I'm not saying this is absolute by any stretch of the imagination. In fact if you look at the Titans, who also started VERY poorly, almost their entire line is red. If you look at teams like that and our Texans for that matter, They were getting killed when they lost, and barely winning when they won. Statistically however, they are an outlier, or an anomaly. For the most part, the farther down on the chart... the more red you see.
Basically there are several ways the Texans can go 8-8 or better.
The most likely and plausible to me is that things come together quickly, they start the season off with a couple of wins, and are generally better than I, or many of the other "naysayers" think they will early. The problem with counting on this is that there are just too many things you are depending on.I can buy this, hell, I hope it happens. I think however that you are just relying on too many things for this to happen. From Spencer coming back to Stanley figuring out how to angle punts again, you're asking for a lot to make this a reality. The biggest factor in this however, is the OL. The defence will need rest this year, its remarkable how often we lose players on defence on this team. If this is going to happen though we MUST GET TURNOVERS. Looking at this whole spreadsheet there is one number that is very consistent. Turnovers. Every team which won 12 or more games was in the top 8 in turnover difference. Other than the Vikings (10th) no team that won 6 games or fewer finished in the top 1/3 in turnover difference. This stat is the great equalizer. Also there was no team that lost more than 8 games who's Green numbers (top 10) out numbered the blue and red.
We catch a few teams on bad days. Anyone wanna know why we beat Indy last year? They had a bad day. Its always possible we catch a couple of teams on bad days.
So you CAN argue that the you believe the Texans will be next years Titans, statistically bad at everything, but not bad enough to lose more than half of their games. If you want to make that argument... have fun.
This year's Texans are no doubt better than last year's edition. I've said before, I think we will start the season about as well as a 4 win team. I think by the end of the year we will be an 8 win team who only won 6 games, but especially if the Birds don't have Vick, then by my estimation, we are only 1 win away from .500.
I'm gonna come back and read this again and try and post that spreadsheet somewhere if anyone is interested.
Mike