So instead, we cut him and kept a couple of MORE worthess or MORE unproductive players taking up roster space. He wasn't going to ever be a starter on this team (when everybody was healthy), but he was our 2nd best LT last preseason (now that he's not a rookie with crap for coaches and more crap for a center). It doesn't matter how bad he was 2 yrs. ago as a rookie. What matters is how good he is now, and that's 2nd best LT on this team as of the the day he was cut. You can't just go around cutting guys because they never lived up to starter status or expectations and then leave yourself with something even worse coming off the bench. You wanna know why he was cut? He was brought here by the previous regime and, if the present regime stretches the heck out of reality, they can actually say that he is not even the 3rd or 4th best player at LT. In reality he was 2nd best, by a small margin. It's the same reason that Morrency was traded. He wasn't quite the best (in their opinion), so suddenly he's not even good enough to stay around.
Now, I realize we've got the swing tackle argument going on. That's probably got a lot to do with it. I won't argue with that, even though I disagree with it in general.
My point is simply that we'd be better off right now if we still had Wand. I think that should be pretty obvious. We might feel like he grossly underfulfilled (new made up word) his expectations from being drafted, but we still needed him at least for this year.