In case you are including me in that group (although I'm sure you meant Herv)...
I didn't say Kubiak hated Wand or Pitts. I said that Kubiak sent Pitts a message. Nor did I say it was insidious. It was very clear - you aren't special. I added that in my opinion the players on the team took that mesage in a couple of different ways.
I have also stated that Kubiak is not bringing Wand back for some reason other than on field performance. My main evidence is that to many he is better than Bedell at left tackle. I question the validity of the reason "Bedell can play guard too" as a deciding factor. We are very weak at tackle depth now. We don't need a guard. If we need depth at both positions, we should consider carrying 10 lineman. There are other extra players on our roster at positions less critical than LT. I attribute Kubiak's inflexibility to his stubborness (he might actually have some faults). Maybe some day someone will convince me of some other reason, but some version of "Kubiak can't make a mistake or have foibles" isn't it.
In the end, some opinions can be correct and not popular. If I'm right - well I got one right. If I'm wrong - well I got another one wrong. If I'm an "elite poster" maybe it is because sometimes I think things through and come to an unpalatable, but correct, conclusion.
You are awfully combative in your replies for someone who is so sure of himself.
YOU made the accusations that Kubiak sat Pitts out for what you are claiming was a "lie" by Kubiak, so back it up with names, dates, transcripts of your recorded conversations with whomever on the team is clueing you in on Kubiak sitting Pitts out for no other reason than to be a turd to Pitts and send some macho-libre "message" to Pitts and the rest of the team. All you are going on is your
assumption that the "rotation situation" hasn't happened again therfore we can connect all the little dots on the big chalkboard of "A Beautiful Mind" and come up with Kubiak being in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963. If you have proof, share it. Otherwise don't yell "Fire" in a crowded theatre. I think that's not asking too much.
Quit playing word games, bro, and back your speculation up with some real evidence. Otherwise, you're just a Kubiak hater fueled by PERHAPS what you consider to have been a bad decision to cut Wand loose.
Why is Joppru still here? The guy collected a paycheck for how long without actually proving his worth on the field? If Kubiak is this egocentric and maniacal leader who trips out whenever he thinks someone needs to be taught a "lesson," then why didn't he cut Joppru the day he was medically cleared...or even better, the day of the first real game experience he could have had? That would have been great--Kubiak: "Oh, you thought you were playing today? Sorry, Jopps...this team plays guys who don't weenie out with make-believe injuries every year. Pack your stuff in that cardboard box and get out." Or here's a better one that he could have pulled: "Mr. Marciano, thanks for your hard work last season on special teams. Technically, you outperformed other coaches last season despite their best efforts to sink this team...but I'm the new guy and I have to ask you to leave so I can give a job to my buddy I grew up with."
If you have theories, put some collateral (evidence) up so we can talk business. If not, then it's just your opinion about Kubiak. You have yours, and I have mine. And nobody has picked up Seth Wand. But I'm sure he'll be back on the field next training camp with us or someone else
Kubiak was nice and said the politically correct thing: "He's a great guy, and if he doesn't catch on somewhere...we'd be glad to have him back next spring." Rings hollow to me, too, but what was the alternative? "Wand stinks and couldn't block a cat door with an 18-wheeler. Next question?"