highroller28
Practice Squad
to a 100+ yard game.
The Texans are getting a great return on investment. One tackle so far.
The Texans are getting a great return on investment. One tackle so far.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
gg no re said:Debate is mainly reruns from April.
dtran04 said:Jevon Kearse only got 1 tackle. He must suck. Darren Howard only got 2. He's as good as Mario.
Sportsfan said:Doesn't matter. 1 yr, 5 yrs, 10 yrs from now, it will still be the biggest mistake in NFL history.
highroller28 said:to a 100+ yard game.
The Texans are getting a great return on investment. One tackle so far.
No Texans should have made the correct draft pick...Dime said:Wow.. then you should go and be a Saints fan..
Superstar said:houston sports front offices never listen to the fans.
http://community.foxsports.com/blogs/Nooch/NFL_Draft/31913What in the Wide World of Sports is Going on Here?
by: Nooch
Mario Bowie was a Bad Pick
May 05, 2006 | 9:55AM
Ordinarily, I would say that the Houston Texans’ selection of Mario Bowie as the #1 overall pick in this year’s NFL Draft was a mistake. Except there was no Mario Bowie in this year’s NFL Draft. Or a Reggie Jordan, for that matter.
highroller28 said:this thread may die, but the debate rages on.
Revolution said:blah, blah, blah. There is no debate. The draft is over and we will not know if the Texans made the right decision for at least 5 years.
See me then....
tbell ncsu said:600 yards.
1. he is not an every down back.
2. he is a backup.
3. he is playing with the saints.
tbell ncsu said:600 yards.
1. he is not an every down back.
2. he is a backup.
3. he is playing with the saints.
Shader said:600 yards huh...Well he's got 121 rushing and receiving yards after game one...........
tbell ncsu said:600 yards.
1. he is not an every down back.
2. he is a backup.
3. he is playing with the saints.
thank you, shannon sharpe. in my world of football, running backs are pretty much always a higher impact player than a defensive end. the only exception that i can think of is julius peppers, and that would really depend on which running back you're comparing him to.He's by far & away a higher impact player right now that Mario.
Shader said:I'm just wondering when this board is going to finally admit that Bush is going to be a great player. Closing your eyes to reality makes you guys appear childish.
Texan said:He'll move to the # 1 back in time.
Battle Red Bull said:Something to think about when the lights go out. We didn't need another GQ model.
TheCD said:If I were a Saints fan and Reggie Bush got the nod ahead of Deuce...I would be absolutely pissed.
Bush is a flashy player who's NOT a #1 running back. He's great at using open space to make guys miss as well as sliding out and playing WR. He's NOT good at powering the football between the guards to get that tough 1st down. Look at the championship game against UT...they went to White instead.
That's not to say he's not good or doesn't have talent. But Reggie Bush isn't perfect, he has flaws in his game that just won't allow him to do certain things (i.e. carry the ball 25+ times). Anyone who thinks he can do that is being entirely unrealistic. How successful is Vick when he's stuck inside the pocket for an entire game? His abilities simply do not complement a pure passing game.
Texans fans...we picked Mario Williams. Get over it. I've said this before and I'll say it again...if you think we needed Bush then you didn't want Kubiak. Our running system HATES flashy backs like Bush. And while for a year or two we might be pining for a flashy back, once our offensive line begins to click, we'll see just how much cap room we'll save each year in being able to use a highly effective RBBC system. With the money we could save from not taking Bush, we might just be able to find some killer DB's in the future. Have hope!