With Hambrick gone...

F

Frailty

Practice Squad

• May 17, 2004

• #1

What about crockett.... would he be worth negociating a trade for? What is his contract information, they don't need wheatley, crockett and Hambrick and Fargas. Would/Should we be willing to give up maybe a third round pick next year to get him, next years draft isn't that apealing. only downside is that he is getting older.... but still i think he's good.

 

281

Veteran

• May 17, 2004

• #2

Why would we need to trade for him??? A 3rd round pick? Please...

 

F

Frailty

Practice Squad

• May 18, 2004

• #3

wtf you think they will give him to us? I wouldnt drop any of those guys, i'd trade them....

 

Fiddy

All Pro

• May 18, 2004

• #4

We got a nice stable of backs, I wouldnt want anybody else

 

Blake

MMQB

• May 18, 2004

• #5

The only one with some value would be Fargas. And trust me, they arent going to let him go.

 

Fiddy

All Pro

• May 18, 2004

• #6

DC_ROCK said:

The only one with some value would be Fargas. And trust me, they arent going to let him go.

Click to expand...

That guy is FAST

 

dirty steve

Veteran

• May 19, 2004

• #7

I thought Baxter/Norris (whoever begins '04 at FB) was going to be the short yardage type back?

 

infantrycak

Hall of Fame

• May 19, 2004

• #8

dirty steve said:

I thought Baxter/Norris (whoever begins '04 at FB) was going to be the short yardage type back?

Click to expand...

Personally thought Norris did a better job of blocking last year and should keep the FB starting job. Baxter played HB in college and could be tried as the short yardage back.