Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!

Top AFC REceving tandems(NFL.com)

Which of these AFC receiver tandems will produce the most yards in 2006?

Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne

Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh

Randy Moss and Jerry Porter

Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds

or if there is other tandems not mention then feel free to add I think it will be the colts tandem because of constitency playing with each other, but I still am keeping my eyes on our own of Johnson and Moulds.
 

BeReal

Noob
It would be a close race between Harrison/Wayne and Johnson/Houshmandzadeh (Depending on if Carson Palmer is at full strength) IMO.
 

TexanFan881

All Pro
MasterC25 said:
Which of these AFC receiver tandems will produce the most yards in 2006?

Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne

Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh

Randy Moss and Jerry Porter

Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds

or if there is other tandems not mention then feel free to add I think it will be the colts tandem because of constitency playing with each other, but I still am keeping my eyes on our own of Johnson and Moulds.

I'd like to think that Andre and Eric will be, but the best and safest bet is on Marvin and Reggie considering they have the one of the most elite QB in the NFL right now.

I think you should add Javon Walker and Donald Driver on there, and maybe Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle El/Brandon Lloyd.
 

BeReal

Noob
TexanFan881 said:
I'd like to think that Andre and Eric will be, but the best and safest bet is on Marvin and Reggie considering they have the one of the most elite QB in the NFL right now.

I think you should add Javon Walker and Donald Driver on there, and maybe Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle El/Brandon Lloyd.
He said Top AFC Tandem :stirpot:
 

TEXANRED

Texan-American
TexanFan881 said:
I think it's more the Carr factor than the talent of Moulds and Johnson that's doubting football fans.
NO........its more of the Manning, Harrison, Wayne factor.

Hater.

:)
 

TexanFan881

All Pro
TEXANRED said:
NO........its more of the Manning, Harrison, Wayne factor.

Hater.

:)
I like David Carr a lot. I already said in my first post in this thread that I think it is Manning, Harrison, and Wayne. What I was saying is a lot of people, football fans in general, might not think that he can get the job done. I don't have anything against David Carr and our offense. I'm not saying even if Carr was Peyton Manning that we'd be first, just that we would get a higher percentage of votes than 8 percent.
 

BeReal

Noob
Yeah, I think it's more of a Manning/Harrison/Wayne thing. Those guys have been playing together for years with a proven game plan.

Carr/Johnson/Moulds all haven't played with each other at the same time. Not to mention a new coaching staff and it will take a few games to get their timing and chemistry right.
 

edo783

Hall of Fame
In the case of the Texans duo, I suspect that it is more to do with the perception of the entire team and our historical inability to keep DC in the upright position so they doubt that the reciever core will be able to produce.
 

TexanSam

Hall of Fame
I would pick Harrison/Wayne and Johnson/Houshmandzadeh over AJ/Moulds. I would put our duo ahead of Moss and Porter though. Moss is past his prime and I don't think Porter is as good as AJ or Moulds. The mere fact that we're mentioned as one of the top 4 recieving tandems in the AFC is pretty awesome though.
 

TexanFan881

All Pro
HJam72 said:
Wrong, wrong, wrong. The answer is Bush and Putzier, lol.
If we take reciever duo + rb (duo optional) + te
we would be right up at the top

Bengals: Chad Johnson, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Rudi Johnson, Reggie Kelly

Colts: Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dominick Rhodes, Dallas Clark

Raiders: Randy Moss, Jerry Porter, Lamont Jordan, Courtney Anderson

Texans: Andre Johnson, Eric Moulds, Reggie Bush, Dominick Davis, Jeb Putzier
 

TEXANRED

Texan-American
TexanFan881 said:
I like David Carr a lot. I already said in my first post in this thread that I think it is Manning, Harrison, and Wayne. What I was saying is a lot of people, football fans in general, might not think that he can get the job done. I don't have anything against David Carr and our offense. I'm not saying even if Carr was Peyton Manning that we'd be first, just that we would get a higher percentage of votes than 8 percent.
Sorry, kidding. I was hoping the smiley conveyed that. Guess it didnt.
 

TexanFan881

All Pro
Texansbacker said:
Another duo worth watching is Steve Smith and Keyshaun Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald and Anquan Boldin.
This topic is AFC, lol, I made the same mistake.

But I can't wait to see what happens with Smith and Johnson because Smith will not be targeted 15 times a game by Delhomme anymore and Delhomme will be able to spread the ball out more.

I think one of the more underrated WR duos in the AFC is Derrick Mason and Mark Clayton. Old, consitant veteran and young up and coming rookie. If Bowler can pick up his game, watch out for Mason and Clayton.
 

stpaul_football

Practice Squad
TexanFan881 said:
If we take reciever duo + rb (duo optional) + te
we would be right up at the top

Bengals: Chad Johnson, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Rudi Johnson, Reggie Kelly

Colts: Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dominick Rhodes, Dallas Clark

Raiders: Randy Moss, Jerry Porter, Lamont Jordan, Courtney Anderson

Texans: Andre Johnson, Eric Moulds, Reggie Bush, Dominick Davis, Jeb Putzier
If you sum all that up, you're pretty much just saying that Carr is gonna be the AFC leader in passing... unless some #3 WR or #2 TE has some kinda breakout season. 5 people? Carr can't throw it to anyone else but himself!
 

Wolf

100% Texan
nothing against payton, but having a dallas clark helps the receiving corp, compared to who we had:stirpot:
 

Texansbacker

Waterboy
TexanFan881 said:
This topic is AFC, lol, I made the same mistake.

But I can't wait to see what happens with Smith and Johnson because Smith will not be targeted 15 times a game by Delhomme anymore and Delhomme will be able to spread the ball out more.

I think one of the more underrated WR duos in the AFC is Derrick Mason and Mark Clayton. Old, consitant veteran and young up and coming rookie. If Bowler can pick up his game, watch out for Mason and Clayton.

Yea, I missed that! What about David Givens and Drew Bennett?

I can't wait for the draft and the start of the season!
 

Trapped

Waterboy
TexanFan881 said:
If we take reciever duo + rb (duo optional) + te
we would be right up at the top

Bengals: Chad Johnson, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Rudi Johnson, Reggie Kelly

Colts: Marvin Harrison, Reggie Wayne, Dominick Rhodes, Dallas Clark

Raiders: Randy Moss, Jerry Porter, Lamont Jordan, Courtney Anderson

Texans: Andre Johnson, Eric Moulds, Reggie Bush, Dominick Davis, Jeb Putzier
If it was about RB + TE combo then the Chargers would be in the Hunt.

Mccardell, Eric Parker, Tomlinson, Gates

Is there anyway we can draft Bush and Vernon Davis to copycat the Holmes/Gonzalez and LT/Gates combo? Trade Putzier and D.Davis? ahaha, Only in Madden
 

mancunian

Old Timer
MasterC25 said:
Which of these AFC receiver tandems will produce the most yards in 2006?

Marvin Harrison and Reggie Wayne

Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh

Randy Moss and Jerry Porter

Andre Johnson and Eric Moulds

or if there is other tandems not mention then feel free to add I think it will be the colts tandem because of constitency playing with each other, but I still am keeping my eyes on our own of Johnson and Moulds.
as much as I would like AJ and Moulds to be the be the leading WR tandem, it ain't gonna happen. I voted for the Bengals guys though it will be close between them the Colts WR's.
 
I don't think Indy will be as productive unless they get an answer to their running game. My guess would be on the Chargers, Broncos, or Bengals. When we get RB, our numbers will go up dramatically. For the first time in the history or our franchise, we will have nasty threats at wide receiver and running back.
 
TexanSam said:
I would pick Harrison/Wayne and Johnson/Houshmandzadeh over AJ/Moulds. I would put our duo ahead of Moss and Porter though. Moss is past his prime and I don't think Porter is as good as AJ or Moulds. The mere fact that we're mentioned as one of the top 4 recieving tandems in the AFC is pretty awesome though.


Moss past his prim yeah right hes better than evry WR on those duo's maybe marvin night have him but moss is better to me i think porter is better than some of those guy we where we should be get an o-line beofre you talk i no our o-line isnt the best but your's is horrible.
 

CoachJim

Waterboy
Tha rizzock said:
Moss past his prim yeah right hes better than evry WR on those duo's maybe marvin night have him but moss is better to me i think porter is better than some of those guy we where we should be get an o-line beofre you talk i no our o-line isnt the best but your's is horrible.
WHAT'd he say? ...
 

edo783

Hall of Fame
Tha rizzock said:
Moss past his prim yeah right hes better than evry WR on those duo's maybe marvin night have him but moss is better to me i think porter is better than some of those guy we where we should be get an o-line beofre you talk i no our o-line isnt the best but your's is horrible.
Holy crap, did you ever even attend school and MAYBE an English class? That group of words (certainly not a sentence anywhere in there) makes ZERO sense.
 

Diehardtexan

Waterboy
edo783 said:
Holy crap, did you ever even attend school and MAYBE an English class? That group of words (certainly not a sentence anywhere in there) makes ZERO sense.
LOL, We use to have a TROLL named Hazakia that posted just like that, his were half caps half small letters. We had a whole thread just for that we called it Hazakia speak:brickwall
 

SAMURAITEXAN

All Pro
Tha rizzock said:
Moss past his prim yeah right hes better than evry WR on those duo's maybe marvin night have him but moss is better to me i think porter is better than some of those guy we where we should be get an o-line beofre you talk i no our o-line isnt the best but your's is horrible.
_| ̄|○ _| ̄|・;∵..-=≡○  
 

dwilt72

Waterboy
I think Harrison and Wayne, simply because of the QB and the numbers they have historically put up. However, I think if David will put in the work (which I wonder if he has done in the past), I think this offense can end up being deadly (assuming we don't have significant injuries). On paper we have a great looking offense, we just don't have a lot of depth right now.
 

Mr Shush

Waterboy
Worth remembering that Palmer is likely to miss some games at the start of the year, which will impact the Bengals receivers' numbers.

I also think it's fair to say that the best receiving tandem in football is quite definitely not in the AFC at all but in, of all places, Arizona.
 
Top