HJam72 said:
I think Palmer's alright and agree that he was a scapegoat. I have no doubt that he was the best out of Capers (as HC), Fangio, Pendry, and himself (geez, what a list of losers) and I think he'll do alright in Dallas.
I am confused at all this Palmer support. Do you guys remember what he was calling prior to his cancellation? It was Joe Pendry with less deep routes, which is a sarcastic way of saying maybe one per quarter, let alone DC actually staying upright to make the throw.
In 2004, he did okay, but our defense was a hell of a lot better (Glenn, Sharper, or hustle, whichever) then so offensive inefficiency wasn't as noticed. Palmer and Pendry both did the run-run-RBpass, six end-arounds per game business. You might say, our O-line was bad, of course he couldn't set up any deep routes ... well, that is crap. Carr threw well on bootlegs/rollouts all freakin year long and we ran maybe one of those per game, and if it happened to be a play Carr did get hit on, well forget that, we went another six quarters w/o going back to it. Meanwhile, run-run-pass sure was getting the job done.
I don't have a statistical breakdown as to our playcalling, and I wish I did. I am just going on what I noticed and I can't tell you how many times I sat there and just shook my head/cringed/threw something because unthinkably, it was as if the guy was caught in repeat and oblivious to the fact that defenses had keyed into what he was doing two weeks ago in film session.
Better yet, the Chron reports that we let DC call his own plays and we put up 24 in a half (against a crappy D, yes, but how many other crappy Ds did we make look like Pro Bowl units this year?). Do the math. Palmer was no scapegoat, the thing is Pendry just wasn't any better. And I am so glad that we are going to have Kubiak doing things around here now.