http://www.nflfans.com/x/showthread.php?t=7793
Looks like Sherman is coming here.
Looks like Sherman is coming here.
Death to Google Ads! Texans Talk Tip Jar! 🍺😎👍
Thanks for your support!
nunusguy said:If this story is true, wonder if it means they may drop the zone blocking system ?
Mike Sherman spent 17 years in coaching before throwing his hat into the NFL ring.
This time around, it seems as if four weeks on the outside looking in was more than enough for the Northborough product.
According to a published report on Saturday, the ex-Packers coach was offered a position as assistant head coach/offensive line head coach Gary Kubiaks first staff in Houston. Tuesday night, a source close to Sherman confirmed to the Daily News that he has accepted the Texans post.
run-david-run said:Hopefully he will improve our individual pass protection more then anything. This would make it even more attractive to draft D'Brick...
cadahnic said:The main aspect of bringing in Sherman is to improve the pass blocking. The zone blocking scheme will do its damage run blocking and with improvement of technique, but Denver's pass blocking was not overly dominant and Kubiak is trying to fix that. Sherman has done a good job in the past of teaching pass blocking technique. I dont think him coming here does much for us drafting D'Brick, if anything it further solidifies the fact that we will either take Bush or draft for defense.
cadahnic said:The main aspect of bringing in Sherman is to improve the pass blocking. The zone blocking scheme will do its damage run blocking and with improvement of technique, but Denver's pass blocking was not overly dominant and Kubiak is trying to fix that. Sherman has done a good job in the past of teaching pass blocking technique. I dont think him coming here does much for us drafting D'Brick, if anything it further solidifies the fact that we will either take Bush or draft for defense.
cap1 said:Great pick up. We need to solidify the defensive coaches now.
O.G. said:Exactly. You know it seems we aren't the only one's that aren't interested in Meeting Jim Bates demands. Buffalo just hired there DC yesterday. I wonder what's the deal with Jerry Gray? Why haven't we considered him?
oso said:To be honest, with Kubiak as HC, I wasn't as concerned about the OC. It's the DC that I am more interested in. Is there a list of viable candidates? All I keep hearing is Bates, and it's usually not in a positive connotation.
O.G. said:It's looking extremely thin IMO
Kaiser Toro said:What is interesting is to know how Sherman's and Bates relationship was/is. Will Sherman help capture Bates and soothe over the control mantra?
Kaiser Toro said:What is interesting is to know how Sherman's and Bates relationship was/is. Will Sherman help capture Bates and soothe over the control mantra?
For the sake of stability I think I'd rather have an unknown who's here for abckey said:I was thinking about that last night when I heard the Sherman news. I hope Bates will put his ego aside and come aboard. Even if he is only here a short time he can groom the future or co dc.
TexanBacker93 said:It's looking thin if all we are considering are big names. All successful coaches were nobodys once. I'd rather get the person that's best for the job rather than overpay to get someone just because they have had success. I think McNair is willing to pay if needed, but he's not Dan Snyder who wants nothing buy headlines. If Bates is the best person for the team they will find a way to get him.
O.G. said:Even if they aren't big names, Teams are locking up there assistants. That or they aren't releasing them from there current contracts. What's the lastest on the two defensive assistants......one from Arizona and the other from Miami? Frank Bush and Richard Smith I believe there names were.
66cobra said:Arizona declined to let Bush interview/accept the co-DC job; I have not heard anything new on Smith as of yet.
Kaiser Toro said:Arizona would not release Bush as of a couple of days ago.
corrosion said:Have to disagree with one point here . Denvers pass protection was FAR above average during the regular season . They ranked 3rd in the NFL with only 23 sacks allowed behind only Cincinnati (21) and Indianapolis (20) .
It wasnt until the Steelers Play-off game that their protection broke down ...and the Steelers did the same thing to the two afore mentioned teams in the play-offs . Cincy allowed 4 sacks to the Steelers in their play-off game , The Colts 5 sacks vs the Steelers while Denver gave up 3 . Not only did they sack them but they harrassed those QB's continually thruought the games .
I think this just shows how good Pittsburgh's defense and scheme is to do that to the TOP THREE teams in sacks allowed in the regular season during their play-off run .
On a side note , the two QB's who were sacked least this past season also put up the highest QB rating's .
Peyton Manning 104.1 ... 20 sacks
Carson Palmer 101.1 .... 21 sacks
A comparison to those sacked the most .
David Carr 77.2 ........68 sacks
Daunte Culpepper 72.0 ....31 sacks in his 7 games before finding his way to the bench due to injury . (Minn was second in sacks allowed this season w/ 54 total)
As for Sherman coming to the Texans , I think its a good hire but only a short term fix because he will be a head coach again in the not too distant future . Sherman was a HC casualty because of injuries and the fact that his O-line was torn apart in the last offseason losing two starters via FA ....
Hardcore Texan said:
it's a good day to be a Texan Fan
I haven't given up on the possibility our DC will be employed by another team until after a certain game on Sunday.
Hardcore Texan said:
it's a good day to be a Texan Fan
I haven't given up on the possibility our DC will be employed by another team until after a certain game on Sunday.
McNair makes him a godfather offer ?Porky said:Are y'all thinking of Dick Lebeau? Why on Earth would he come here?
nunusguy said:McNair makes him a godfather offer ?
TEXANRED said:Isnt Dick Labeau a D coordinator? Why would he make a latteral move?