SESupergenius said:
If anything, Foster slid to the 20th, he was not a reach as you say. Let's just stick to facts and you might have an argument and try not to give your take such a stretch. Great Tackles are not usually found in round 4. Is that you Casserly?
Pro Football Weekly called the pick "funny" and said they were not wild about it
http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFLDraft/Draft+Day/2003/edholm3.htm
CNNSI mock had him going @ #39
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2003/draft/news/2003/04/24/mock_draft/
CNNSI also projected early second round in his bio
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/2003/draft/players/755.html
Scout.com questioned if teams should "take a chance on him early in next Aprils draft?"
http://scout.scout.com/a.z?s=135&p=8&c=1&nid=1932467
and NFL Draft Blitz had this to say about LTs in general siting Foster as an exaple specifically
For about 10 years now, scouts and Gm's have desperately been looking for long term answers at the offensive tackle position. Certainly, with the development of more sophisticated blocking schemes and an emphasis on cohesion, the struggle has been covered up nicely. Hence, one may ask, "Why even sought out Franchise tackles anyway, if you can be efficient with cheaper personnel?" The fact is, if you can find a true blue chip tackle, you give yourself not only a guy to build an entire offense around, but also you neutralize virtually any pass rushing menace and grant your line even more creative flexibility in terms of blocking schemes. Unfortunately, It's been accepted from most parties, that unless you have a top 10 pick in the first round, or a ton of cap space, your team isn't gonna have much luck in finding their blindside blue chipper. This leads teams to settle on late round gems, patch work veterans, and/or reaching for mid level prospects not worth of their draft position. Yes, there are exceptions, but few and far between.
There is no pinpointed reason for the shortage. Perhaps it can be attributed to the pressure on young lineman to add so much weight. A lot of players lose their mobility, and open themselves up to injury in exchange for hitting that 315 Lb. plateau. Maybe it's the more team oriented blocking schemes on the college level that eliminate athletic showcasing and can stun development. Whatever the case,
all the proof you need about how limited a Gm's choices have become, is right in the pudding; Players like Marc Colombo, Kwame Harris,
George Foster, and Luke Petigout were all first round picks. That isn't to say that any of them were lacking in talent or ability. Some have become solid consistent starters. But no way did some of these players match the traditional profile of an OT worthy of a 1st round selection. Gm's are forced to pull the trigger on these mid level talents because someone has to protect the blindside of their 80 million dollar investments. So even if it means settling for less, or wasting draft day value, decision makers hold their breath and make the questionable selection.
http://www.nfldraftblitz.com/Inthetrenches.htm
Them there are facts...
and oh,
I never said that great tackles are usually taken in the fourth round...
My name is Mike Massey.
That should cover it, I think