Keep Texans Talk Google Ad Free!
Venmo Tip Jar | Paypal Tip Jar
Thanks for your support! 🍺😎👍

Bill Barnwell/Grantland: Don’t Dismiss Texans

Playoffs

Hall of Fame
Don’t Dismiss Texas
BY BILL BARNWELL for GRANTLAND
...This year, the Houston Texans will attempt to be the third consecutive franchise to boomerang back into the playoffs. They have a better shot than you might think. Just as was the case with the Chiefs last August, let’s run through the reasons why the Texans could be the latest franchise to take a large step forward.

The Statistical Case

In December, as Houston was finishing its collapse to 2-14, I wrote about how many of the statistical indicators suggested that Houston wasn’t quite as bad as its record. A pair of subsequent blowout losses to the Colts and Broncos color those numbers some, but even with them included, the Texans simply didn’t play like a 2-14 team last season and won’t look like one again in 2014. Here’s why:

They had the point differential of a 4-12 team....Since 1989, there have been 22 teams that have underperformed their point differential by somewhere between two and 2.5 wins. Those teams improved by an average of 1.6 wins the following season. Not exactly the sort of improvement to plan a nonrefundable parade, but it’s a start.

They lost a disproportionate number of their close games....Houston’s not “due” to win a bunch of close games, just as it wasn’t due to lose a ton of them this past season, but there’s no reason to think it will be that bad in close contests again.

They’re subject to the Plexiglass Principle. Good teams that suddenly turn bad out of nowhere tend to gain back some of their losses very quickly... Forty-eight teams have declined by six wins or more since 1989; the following season, those teams won an average of 3.1 more games than they had the previous campaign.

They blew a lot of games in the second half....Just five other teams have blown at least six halftime leads in a season since 1989, and each of those teams improved dramatically (by 5.2 wins) the following season...

They allowed way too many defensive touchdowns....Since 1999, 56 teams have allowed 30 points (five touchdowns) or more on offensive turnover returns. The following year, those teams allowed an average of 17 points, which is almost exactly at the league average of 16.8 points per season...

They’re going to create more takeaways....There are 53 teams since 1989 with a turnover margin between minus-25 and minus-15, and in the subsequent season, their respective turnover margins were almost exactly zero...

They’ll be better at kicking field goals....The good news is that Bullock hit his final 12 field goal attempts, and that the Texans are unlikely to hit just 74.3 percent of their field goals this season, as kicking accuracy is wildly inconsistent from year to year...

They’ll face an easy schedule. Last year, Houston’s out-of-division schedule included the NFC West, the AFC West, and first-place matchups against the Ravens and Broncos. Their brutal slate rated as the AFC’s toughest schedule and...​

The Human Case

The Texans are unlikely to quit on their coach again. It’s impossible to quantify whether a team has given up...

It’s also impossible to figure out whether an NFL head coach will succeed before he actually steps into the gig, but Bill O’Brien certainly seems to have plenty of potential. After spending five seasons...

They’ll have a possible upgrade at quarterback. It seems strange to say Ryan Fitzpatrick represents an upgrade at quarterback, but Houston’s passers were really bad last season. No, really, compare their 2013 numbers to Fitzpatrick’s since the Harvard star began his first season as a full-time starter in Buffalo in 2010:

Code:
Player	        Cmp	Att	Cmp%	Yds	Y/Att	TD	INT
Houston QBs	371	633	58.6%	4183	6.6	19	22
Fitzpatrick	283	466	60.7%	3172	6.8	21	16
Fitzpatrick also hasn’t had a receiver pair as good as Andre Johnson and DeAndre Hopkins to work with since he spent 2008 with Chad Johnson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh in Cincinnati.

It’s also possible that O’Brien eventually turns the job over to Tom Savage...

The Texans added a once-in-a-generation pass-rusher....

Houston might be healthier....Just eight Texans managed to start all 16 games in 2013, with stars like Arian Foster, Brian Cushing, Duane Brown, and Johnathan Joseph each missing time...

There will be fewer replacement-level snaps....Up and down the roster, players who simply aren’t NFL-caliber regulars were thrust into roles they couldn’t handle. Guys like Ryan Harris, Case Keenum, Wade Smith, Ryan Griffin, and Darryl Sharpton played hundreds of snaps that will go to better players in 2014.​

The Case Against Houston

Ryan Fitzpatrick is no good. Had the Texans made a more significant upgrade at quarterback this offseason, I would be banging this drum much harder. As it is, while improvement is assured, the playoffs might be...

...It’s not that Fitzpatrick is good enough to drag his team into January. It’s that he’s not subpar enough to prevent them from dragging him over the finish line.

Andre Johnson is pissed....

There are still holes on the lines. Despite the presence of superstars like Brown and Watt, departures and failed maneuvers have left Houston thin up front...

It’s a top-heavy team....What’s left is a team with a few stars (Watt, Brown, Johnson, Foster, Clowney, Cushing, and Joseph) and little in reserve. For the Texans to compete, they need as many of those guys as possible to stay healthy for 16 games.

They don’t have Andrew Luck. Luck is really good.

...For the Texans to get to the next level and approach the postseason, though, they’ll need all of their offensive weapons (and coaches) firing on all cylinders. If they can combine a competent offense with the devastating pass-rush combination of Watt and Clowney, Houston might just be the latest surprise entrant into the playoffs.​
snipped, read complete article/statistics here: http://grantland.com/features/houston-texans-preview/
 
I dunno....
On the one hand, the article lists a boatload of rebound stats that all make me feel a heckuva lot better about our prospects going into this season

but then there's THIS...
Ryan Fitzpatrick is no good. Had the Texans made a more significant upgrade at quarterback this offseason, I would be banging this drum much harder. As it is, while improvement is assured, the playoffs might be too tall of a task with the Fitzchise at quarterback. Outside of a useful half-season with the Bills in 2011, Fitzpatrick’s been a below-average quarterback throughout his career, throwing interceptions on a whopping 3.6 percent of his pass attempts. During Fitzpatrick’s career, the only passers (minimum 1,000 attempts) who have thrown interceptions more frequently are - avert your eyes - Rex Grossman, Vince Young, Jon Kitna, Derek Anderson, and Mark Sanchez. Think about the guys I didn’t mention. He’s thrown interceptions more frequently than Jake Delhomme!
and this...
There are still holes on the lines. Despite the presence of superstars like Brown and Watt, departures and failed maneuvers have left Houston thin up front.
I'm still thinking if we win 7 games it'll be a miracle.
:texflag:

edit:
Thanks for posting though; MSR.
 
The Texans added a once-in-a-generation pass-rusher....
************************************
Who's that ? Never mind, I know who it is, I'm still just real pumped about that pick.
 
That's why they play the game..... Could have summed it up like this.. They can't get any worse !!
 
Just a way to get paid for a day's work for that journalist. He had to write about something. Unless he predicted the Texans at 2-14, or even 4-12 last year, just another football masturbation article.

They had the point differential of a 4-12 team

We were as good as a 4-12 team!! :fans:
We were as good as a 4-12 team!! :fans:

come on, everybody,

We were as good as a 4-12 team!! :fans:

They lost a disproportionate number of their close games....Houston’s not “due” to win a bunch of close games, just as it wasn’t due to lose a ton of them this past season, but there’s no reason to think it will be that bad in close contests again.

Could be some truth there, but not due to the odds. On second thought, with Kubiak and Co. gone the odds of an in-game adjustment goes up by default.

They’ll be better at kicking field goals....The good news is that Bullock hit his final 12 field goal attempts, and that the Texans are unlikely to hit just 74.3 percent of their field goals this season, as kicking accuracy is wildly inconsistent from year to year...

Yet more talk from his crystal ball.

They allowed way too many defensive touchdowns

Wow, Mensa talk right there.

*********

Sorry for my reception of this article, but the guy was just wasting time in hopes of real football news tomorrow.
 
They don’t have Andrew Luck. Luck is really good.
Luck is over-rated. When did a 57% completion rating and an 81.5 QB rating translate into being a good QB? Luck has the benefit of playing in the worst division in the NFL.

Andrew Luck is the white man's Vince Young.
 
Luck is over-rated. When did a 57% completion rating and an 81.5 QB rating translate into being a good QB? Luck has the benefit of playing in the worst division in the NFL.

Andrew Luck is the white man's Vince Young.

I wish, but he is the real deal and his career will prove it.
 
Luck is over-rated. When did a 57% completion rating and an 81.5 QB rating translate into being a good QB? Luck has the benefit of playing in the worst division in the NFL.

Andrew Luck is the white man's Vince Young.

Luck took a weak Colts team to the playoffs 2 yrs in a row and plays his best with the game on the line. He may be just a little better than VY.
 
Luck took a weak Colts team to the playoffs 2 yrs in a row and plays his best with the game on the line. He may be just a little better than VY.

Vince Young played his best with the game on the line and took the Titans to the playoffs.

Just sayin.
 
Vince Young played his best with the game on the line and took the Titans to the playoffs.

Just sayin.

How did VY play in the playoffs?

Did his team win?

How many games did VY's team win in his career.

Luck was quite impressive against the Chiefs in the playoffs last yr.
 
Here's what I took from his article:

They had the point differential of a 4-12 team....Since 1989, there have been 22 teams that have underperformed their point differential by somewhere between two and 2.5 wins. Those teams improved by an average of 1.6 wins the following season.

So the Texans should win 3.6 games this season. Yay?

They’re subject to the Plexiglass Principle. Good teams that suddenly turn bad out of nowhere tend to gain back some of their losses very quickly... Forty-eight teams have declined by six wins or more since 1989; the following season, those teams won an average of 3.1 more games than they had the previous campaign.

Oh, wait ... it'll be 5.1 wins this season. Things are looking up!

They blew a lot of games in the second half....Just five other teams have blown at least six halftime leads in a season since 1989, and each of those teams improved dramatically (by 5.2 wins) the following season...

Ha! Now it'll be 7.2 wins this season. Keep writing Bill, and the Texans really will win enough to make the playoffs.

In all seriousness, I can see a respectable team that competes every game, but I don't see playoffs for the 2014 season.
 
How did VY play in the playoffs?

Did his team win?

How many games did VY's team win in his career.

Luck was quite impressive against the Chiefs in the playoffs last yr.

The Colts got crushed by the Ravens, eecked out a 1 win over the Chiefs only to get his ass handed to him by the Patriots.

Luck is over-rated.
 
Here's what I took from his article:



So the Texans should win 3.6 games this season. Yay?



Oh, wait ... it'll be 5.1 wins this season. Things are looking up!



Ha! Now it'll be 7.2 wins this season. Keep writing Bill, and the Texans really will win enough to make the playoffs.

In all seriousness, I can see a respectable team that competes every game, but I don't see playoffs for the 2014 season.

Your math is wrong, they compound on top of each other.

So 1.6+3.1+5.2+2= 11.9 wins

Championship!
 
The Colts got crushed by the Ravens, eecked out a 1 win over the Chiefs only to get his ass handed to him by the Patriots.

Luck is over-rated.

The Colts are overrated, Luck is the only reason that team has gone to the post season the last two years, the guy is legit.
 
I'm glad someone wrote this. Anyone who actually paid attention last year knew that there was a perfect storm of bad that caused our record to be 2-14. From terrible line play, to the QB disasters, to multiple devastating injuries (again), to terrible officiating like SNF against the Colts....it can't be nearly as bad again, can it? At least one would presume. Nevermind. Of course it can.

I'll go on record as saying the Texans go at least 9-7 this season.

This team is way better than what last year suggested and is in a very, very winnable division.
 
Luck took a weak Colts team to the playoffs 2 yrs in a row and plays his best with the game on the line. He may be just a little better than VY.

Well I believe he is better than VY, I can say that even though they beat KC last year, it was more of a KC collapse than AL being a great QB that brought his team back. That game was more reflective of Buffalo beating Houston. Houston Choked that away.

People say Andy Dalton doesn't have what it takes, as has taken the Bengals to the playoffs 3 straight year and was out in the first round. Well look at Luck, except he beat KC, and it was KC who choked that up.. So, the numbers are pretty much even when it comes to that. How can 1 QB that took a Cincy team to the playoffs 3x in a row not be thought of as really good, but Luck does it 2x and they are saying he is.

Not saying AL will not be elite, but now his numbers do not show that he is, just going 2 for 2 in his first 2 years doesn't justify that, when Dalton did the same, and we all know he is not thought of in that regard.
 
Your math is wrong, they compound on top of each other.

So 1.6+3.1+5.2+2= 11.9 wins

Championship!
Nah, you're still short! :kitten:

The Statistical Case

They had the point differential of a 4-12 team....Since 1989, there have been 22 teams that have underperformed their point differential by somewhere between two and 2.5 wins. Those teams improved by an average of 1.6 wins the following season.

See, we should have had 4 wins as a baseline + the 1.6 increase = 5.6

Forty-eight teams have declined by six wins or more since 1989; the following season, those teams won an average of 3.1 more games than they had the previous campaign.

So, since we dropped so far, we'll rebound that 3.1 - We're up to 8.7

They blew a lot of games in the second half....Just five other teams have blown at least six halftime leads in a season since 1989, and each of those teams improved dramatically (by 5.2 wins) the following season...

Well heck, we just can't blow that many leads again - Wow, we're up to 13.9
Lies, damn lies, statistics and the Texans. :cowboy1:
 
Back
Top